• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保持低调的价值:积极情绪和离散积极情绪对器官捐献登记结果的差异和因果影响。

The Value of Being Discrete: The Differential and Causal Effects of Positive Affect and Discrete Positive Emotions on Organ Donor Registration Outcomes.

机构信息

Claremont Graduate University, USA.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2018 Nov;10(3):481-503. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12134. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1111/aphw.12134
PMID:29989385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current studies examined how positive affect (i.e. the blend of several positive feelings over time) and discrete positive emotions (i.e. a specific set of momentary thoughts and feelings) influence organ donor registration outcomes.

METHODS

In Study 1, participants were randomly assigned to a writing task intended to elicit positive or negative affect. In Study 2, participants received a discrete positively valenced emotion induction (i.e. elevation, humor, hubristic pride), or were in a control condition.

RESULTS

Study 1 (N = 503) indicated a causal relationship between general positive affect and registration attitudes. An indirect effect beginning with general positive affect, going through attitudes, and then intentions, to influence behavior was also indicated. Study 2a (N = 394) demonstrated that elevation, humor, and hubristic pride can be influenced using an online platform. Study 2b (N = 1,046) indicated a causal relationship between elevation and increased registration intentions and behavior. The humor recall task caused marginally significant greater registration intentions, but no significant behavioral differences. The hubristic pride task did not influence registration outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Organ donor practitioners and scholars could benefit from increased focus on the emotional states likely to be experienced at different venues when considering intervention contexts.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨积极情绪(即随着时间推移多种积极情绪的融合)和离散积极情绪(即特定的瞬间想法和感受)如何影响器官捐赠登记结果。

方法

在研究 1 中,参与者被随机分配到一个旨在引发积极或消极情绪的写作任务中。在研究 2 中,参与者接受了离散的积极情绪诱导(即提升、幽默、傲慢的骄傲),或处于控制条件下。

结果

研究 1(N=503)表明,一般积极情绪与登记态度之间存在因果关系。还表明,一般积极情绪通过态度,然后通过意图影响行为,从而产生间接影响。研究 2a(N=394)表明,使用在线平台可以影响提升、幽默和傲慢的骄傲。研究 2b(N=1046)表明,提升与增加登记意图和行为之间存在因果关系。幽默回忆任务导致登记意向略有显著增加,但行为上没有显著差异。傲慢的骄傲任务没有影响登记结果。

结论

器官捐赠从业者和学者可以从增加对不同环境下可能经历的情绪状态的关注中受益,这在考虑干预环境时很重要。

相似文献

1
The Value of Being Discrete: The Differential and Causal Effects of Positive Affect and Discrete Positive Emotions on Organ Donor Registration Outcomes.保持低调的价值:积极情绪和离散积极情绪对器官捐献登记结果的差异和因果影响。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2018 Nov;10(3):481-503. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12134. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
2
Anger, frustration, boredom and the Department of Motor Vehicles: Can negative emotions impede organ donor registration?愤怒、沮丧、无聊与机动车管理部门:负面情绪会阻碍器官捐赠登记吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Mar;153:174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
3
The impact of overtly listing eligibility requirements on MTurk: An investigation involving organ donation, recruitment scripts, and feelings of elevation.过于明确列出资格要求对 MTurk 的影响:一项涉及器官捐赠、招募脚本和提升感的调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;142:256-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.020. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
4
If you needed an organ transplant would you have one? The effect of reciprocity priming and mode of delivery on organ donor registration intentions and behaviour.如果你需要进行器官移植,你会接受吗?互惠启动和传递方式对器官捐赠登记意愿及行为的影响。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(3):577-588. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12248. Epub 2017 May 26.
5
How Perceived Similarity Moderates Sympathy and Pride Appeal in Organ Donation Messages.感知相似性如何调节器官捐赠信息中的同情和自豪诉求。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Sep;53(7):2105-2111. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
6
Anticipated regret and organ donor registration--a pilot study.预期后悔与器官捐献登记——一项试点研究。
Health Psychol. 2011 Sep;30(5):661-4. doi: 10.1037/a0024182.
7
Attitude-behavior consistency, the principle of compatibility, and organ donation: A classic innovation.态度-行为一致性、兼容性原则与器官捐赠:经典创新。
Health Psychol. 2014 Sep;33(9):1084-91. doi: 10.1037/hea0000062. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
8
Is pride a prosocial emotion? Interpersonal effects of authentic and hubristic pride.骄傲是一种亲社会情感吗?真实的骄傲和自负的人际影响。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(6):1084-97. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.646956. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
9
Organ donation video messaging: differential appeal, emotional valence, and behavioral intention.器官捐赠视频信息:差异吸引力、情感效价和行为意图。
Clin Transplant. 2014 Oct;28(10):1184-92. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12449. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
10
Predictors of engaging in family discussion about organ donation and getting organ donor cards witnessed.参与关于器官捐赠的家庭讨论并获取有见证的器官捐赠卡的预测因素。
Health Commun. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):142-52. doi: 10.1080/10410230801968104.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.增加实体器官捐献者登记的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 4;4(4):CD10829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010829.pub2.
2
Respect, interaction, immediacy and the role community plays in registering an organ donation decision.尊重、互动、即时性以及社区在器官捐赠决策登记中的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 26;17(1):e0263096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263096. eCollection 2022.