• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分布式机会感知问题中的帕累托最优决策

Pareto Optimal Decision Making in a Distributed Opportunistic Sensing Problem.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Cybern. 2019 Feb;49(2):719-725. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2766451. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1109/TCYB.2017.2766451
PMID:29990182
Abstract

We extend prior results on a single decision maker opportunistic sensing problem to a distributed, multidecision maker setting. The original formulation of the problem considers how to opportunistically use "in-flight" sensors to maximize target coverage. In that paper, the authors show that this problem is NP-hard with a strong polynomial heuristic for a single decision maker. This paper extends this by considering a distributed decision making scenario in which multiple independent parties attempt to simultaneously engage in opportunistic sensor assignment while managing interassignment conflict. Specifically, we develop an algorithm that: 1) produces a Pareto optimal opportunistic sensor allocation; 2) requires fewer bits of communicated information than a completely centralized deconfliction approach; and 3) runs in distributed polynomial time once the individual decision makers identify their preferred (optimal) sensor allocations. We validate these claims using appropriate simulations.

摘要

我们将单一决策者机会感知问题的先前结果扩展到分布式多决策者设置。该问题的原始表述考虑了如何利用“飞行中”的传感器来最大限度地提高目标覆盖率。在那篇论文中,作者表明对于单个决策者,这个问题具有很强的 NP 难特性,并提出了一种强多项式启发式算法。本文通过考虑分布式决策制定场景来扩展这个问题,其中多个独立的方试图同时进行机会主义传感器分配,同时管理分配之间的冲突。具体来说,我们开发了一种算法:1)产生帕累托最优的机会主义传感器分配;2)与完全集中的去冲突方法相比,需要更少的通信信息位;3)一旦各个决策者确定了他们的首选(最优)传感器分配,就可以在分布式多项式时间内运行。我们使用适当的模拟来验证这些主张。

相似文献

1
Pareto Optimal Decision Making in a Distributed Opportunistic Sensing Problem.分布式机会感知问题中的帕累托最优决策
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2019 Feb;49(2):719-725. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2766451. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
2
Optimal Decision-Making in an Opportunistic Sensing Problem.机会感知问题中的最优决策。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2016 Dec;46(12):3285-3293. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2502421. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
3
A Soft⁻Hard Combination Decision Fusion Scheme for a Clustered Distributed Detection System with Multiple Sensors.一种具有多个传感器的聚类分布式检测系统的软硬组合决策融合方案。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Dec 10;18(12):4370. doi: 10.3390/s18124370.
4
Optimizing Movement for Maximizing Lifetime of Mobile Sensors for Covering Targets on a Line.优化移动以最大化移动传感器覆盖线上目标的寿命。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 11;19(2):273. doi: 10.3390/s19020273.
5
Multiobjective Optimization of Linear Cooperative Spectrum Sensing: Pareto Solutions and Refinement.线性协作频谱感知的多目标优化:Pareto 解与细化。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2016 Jan;46(1):96-108. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2395412. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
6
A multiobjective optimization approach to obtain decision thresholds for distributed detection in wireless sensor networks.一种用于获取无线传感器网络中分布式检测决策阈值的多目标优化方法。
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2010 Apr;40(2):444-57. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2026633. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
7
Problem Specific MOEA/D for Barrier Coverage with Wireless Sensors.基于无线传感器的障碍覆盖问题专用 MOEA/D。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2017 Nov;47(11):3854-3865. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2585745. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Target Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks with Probabilistic Sensors.具有概率传感器的无线传感器网络中的目标覆盖
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Aug 27;16(9):1372. doi: 10.3390/s16091372.
9
Pareto front estimation for decision making.用于决策的帕累托前沿估计
Evol Comput. 2014 Winter;22(4):651-78. doi: 10.1162/EVCO_a_00128.
10
Optimality versus stability in water resource allocation.水资源分配中的最优性与稳定性
J Environ Manage. 2014 Jan 15;133:343-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.045. Epub 2014 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
QoS-Driven Adaptive Trust Service Coordination in the Industrial Internet of Things.面向工业物联网的服务质量驱动的自适应信任协调
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jul 27;18(8):2449. doi: 10.3390/s18082449.