IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018 Dec;65(12):2222-2232. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2786340. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
Echocardiographic determination of multicomponent blood flow dynamics in the left ventricle remains a challenge. In this paper, we compare contrast enhanced, high frame rate (HFR) (1000 frames/s) echo-particle image velocimetry (ePIV) against optical particle image velocimetry (oPIV, gold standard), in a realistic left ventricular (LV) phantom. We find that ePIV compares well to oPIV, even for the high velocity inflow jet (normalized RMSE = 9% ± 1%). In addition, we perform the method of proper orthogonal decomposition, to better qualify and quantify the differences between the two modalities. We show that ePIV and oPIV resolve very similar flow structures, especially for the lowest order mode with a cosine similarity index of 86%. The coarser resolution of ePIV does result in increased variance and blurring of smaller flow structures when compared to oPIV. However, both modalities are in good agreement with each other for the modes that constitute the bulk of the kinetic energy. We conclude that HFR ePIV can accurately estimate the high velocity diastolic inflow jet and the high energy flow structures in an LV setting.
左心室多分量血流动力学的超声心动图测定仍然是一个挑战。在本文中,我们将对比增强、高帧率(HFR)(1000 帧/秒)的回声粒子图像测速(ePIV)与光学粒子图像测速(oPIV,金标准),在一个真实的左心室(LV)模型中。我们发现 ePIV 与 oPIV 相比表现良好,即使是对于高速射流(归一化均方根误差=9%±1%)。此外,我们还进行了本征正交分解(POD)的方法,以更好地定性和定量两种模态之间的差异。我们表明,ePIV 和 oPIV 解析出非常相似的流动结构,尤其是最低阶模式,余弦相似度指数为 86%。与 oPIV 相比,ePIV 的分辨率较低会导致较小的流动结构的方差和模糊度增加。然而,对于构成大部分动能的模式,两种模态都彼此非常一致。我们的结论是,HFR ePIV 可以准确地估计左心室中的高速舒张射流和高能流动结构。