Walker Lucy Camilla, Clement Nick D, Deehan David J
Department of Orthopaedics, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
J Knee Surg. 2019 Aug;32(8):736-741. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666866. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
It is estimated that up to a third of recipients of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) experience chronic pain postoperatively. However, there are no clear indications within the literature that predict which patients are at higher risk of being dissatisfied with their TKA. The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is one of the most commonly used, patient-reported outcome measures in patients with lower limb osteoarthritis. This review discusses the available evidence surrounding the predictability of the outcome of TKA using the WOMAC score as well as considering further patient factors that have been implicated in the level of improvement post TKA. It may be concluded from the available literature that a combination of knee scores and patient factors would be the most accurate way of predicting those patients most likely to have a good outcome from their TKA. There is some disparity within the literature about which patient factors and reported outcome measure scores lead to a positive postoperative outcome. Patient expectations following the procedure also need to be evaluated, as objective measures on a scoring system do not necessarily equate with the subjective patient experience.
据估计,全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中高达三分之一会在术后经历慢性疼痛。然而,文献中没有明确迹象能预测哪些患者对TKA不满意的风险更高。西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)是下肢骨关节炎患者中最常用的患者报告结局指标之一。本综述讨论了围绕使用WOMAC评分预测TKA结局的现有证据,并考虑了与TKA术后改善水平相关的其他患者因素。从现有文献中可以得出结论,膝关节评分和患者因素相结合将是预测哪些患者最有可能从TKA中获得良好结局的最准确方法。关于哪些患者因素和报告的结局指标得分会导致术后积极结局,文献中存在一些差异。术后患者的期望也需要评估,因为评分系统上的客观测量不一定等同于患者的主观体验。