Swygard H, Seña Arlene C, Mobley V, Clymore J, Sampson L, Glenn K, Keller J E, Donovan J, Berger M B, Durr A, Klein E, Sullivan K A, Quinlivan E B
associate professor of medicine, Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases and Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
associate professor of medicine, Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases and Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
N C Med J. 2018 Jul-Aug;79(4):210-217. doi: 10.18043/ncm.79.4.210.
Statewide interventions are critical to meeting the goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy in this country. In 2012, the North Carolina Division of Public Health developed the North Carolina State Bridge Counselor program to improve linkage to and reengagement in care for newly diagnosed persons and persons living with HIV who were out-of-care. We reviewed the planning process for the North Carolina State Bridge Counselor program, which involved a review of existing strengths-based counseling models for persons living with HIV, implementation of these models, and communication strategies with other providers. State bridge counselor responsibilities were delineated from the role of disease intervention specialists while retaining the fieldwork capability of disease intervention specialists to conduct outreach and provide services for persons living with HIV throughout the state. Program implementation required extensive planning with stakeholders, incorporation of strengths-based counseling models, development of performance standards, and utilization of CAREWare, an HIV care software program to document referrals and data-sharing between state bridge counselors and clinics. By the end of 2014, state bridge counselor services were provided to approximately 60 of the 400 persons living with HIV (15%) who are diagnosed each quarter in North Carolina, with increasing utilization of the program. We assessed the development of this intervention specific to the North Carolina Division of Public Health, which may limit its generalizability. However, the State Bridge Counselor program was implemented in both urban and rural areas throughout the state, which increases its applicability to different public health programs throughout the country. We demonstrated that a statewide State Bridge Counselor program for linkage and reengagement activities can be implemented by leveraging existing infrastructures, electronic medical records, HIV care networks, and fieldwork activities.
全州范围的干预措施对于实现该国《国家艾滋病毒/艾滋病战略》的目标至关重要。2012年,北卡罗来纳州公共卫生部设立了北卡罗来纳州桥梁咨询项目,以改善新诊断出的艾滋病毒感染者以及失访的艾滋病毒感染者与医疗服务的联系并促使他们重新接受治疗。我们回顾了北卡罗来纳州桥梁咨询项目的规划过程,该过程包括对现有的针对艾滋病毒感染者的基于优势的咨询模式进行审查、实施这些模式以及与其他服务提供者的沟通策略。桥梁咨询员的职责与疾病干预专家的职责有所区分,同时保留疾病干预专家的实地工作能力,以便在全州范围内为艾滋病毒感染者开展外展服务并提供服务。项目实施需要与利益相关者进行广泛规划,纳入基于优势的咨询模式,制定绩效标准,并利用CAREWare(一款艾滋病毒护理软件程序)来记录转诊情况以及州桥梁咨询员与诊所之间的数据共享。到2014年底,北卡罗来纳州每季度新诊断出的约400名艾滋病毒感染者中有60人(15%)接受了州桥梁咨询员的服务,并且该项目的利用率不断提高。我们评估了这项针对北卡罗来纳州公共卫生部的干预措施的发展情况,这可能会限制其普遍性。然而,州桥梁咨询项目在全州的城市和农村地区都得到了实施,这增加了其在全国不同公共卫生项目中的适用性。我们证明,通过利用现有基础设施、电子病历、艾滋病毒护理网络和实地工作活动,可以实施一项全州范围的用于联系和重新参与活动的州桥梁咨询项目。