Suppr超能文献

腔内金属支架治疗良性胃肠道狭窄的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and safety of lumen-apposing metal stent for benign gastrointestinal stricture.

作者信息

Jain Deepanshu, Patel Upen, Ali Sara, Sharma Abhinav, Shah Manan, Singhal Shashideep

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Digestive Diseases and Transplantation, Internal Medicine, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (Deepanshu Jain).

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas (Upen Patel, Sara Ali, Abhinav Sharma, Manan Shah, Shashideep Singhal), USA.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):425-438. doi: 10.20524/aog.2018.0272. Epub 2018 May 7.

Abstract

Management of benign gastrointestinal (GI) strictures refractory to primary (balloon and savary dilation) and secondary (steroid injection, fully covered self-expanding metal stent, incision therapy) treatment modalities remains a challenge. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), originally designed for the management of pancreatic fluid collections, are an attractive option for GI stricture because of their anti-migratory property, attributable to their saddle-shaped design. In this article, we reviewed 70 patients from 12 original studies who received LAMS for refractory (68/70) or treatment-naïve (2/70) benign GI stricture. The technical and clinical success rates were 98.6% (69/70) and 79.7% (55/69), respectively. Endoscopic placement, with or without fluoroscopic guidance, was generally successful, with only a minority requiring endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance where the lumen was completely obscured. The majority of the strictures were short (≤1 cm), but comparable technical and clinical success was noted in isolated cases with long strictures, where 2 overlapping LAMSs were placed. For the overall population, a failure rate of 21.5% (14/69) was noted and was attributed to either lack of follow up, or to persistent or symptoms requiring stent removal/exchange or surgical referral. One perforation (1.4%), five stent migration events (7.1%), two bleeding events (2.9%) and two strictures proximal to the LAMS (2.9%) were reported for the entire study cohort. No mortality was attributable to LAMS placement. Although experience is still evolving, LAMS placement guided by esophagogastroduodenoscopy or EUS is a technically feasible and safe procedure with good clinical outcomes for benign refractory GI strictures.

摘要

对于原发性(球囊扩张和沙氏扩张)及继发性(类固醇注射、全覆膜自膨式金属支架、切开治疗)治疗方式均无效的良性胃肠道(GI)狭窄,其管理仍然是一项挑战。管腔贴附金属支架(LAMS)最初设计用于处理胰液积聚,因其鞍形设计具有抗迁移特性,故而对于GI狭窄是一个有吸引力的选择。在本文中,我们回顾了来自12项原始研究的70例患者,这些患者因难治性(68/70)或初治(2/70)良性GI狭窄接受了LAMS治疗。技术成功率和临床成功率分别为98.6%(69/70)和79.7%(55/69)。在内镜引导下放置,无论有无荧光透视引导,通常都能成功,只有少数情况在管腔完全不清时需要内镜超声(EUS)引导。大多数狭窄较短(≤1 cm),但在放置2个重叠LAMS的长狭窄孤立病例中也观察到了类似的技术和临床成功率。对于总体人群,观察到失败率为21.5%(14/69),原因是缺乏随访,或持续存在症状需要取出/更换支架或转诊手术。整个研究队列报告了1例穿孔(1.4%)、5例支架迁移事件(7.1%)、2例出血事件(2.9%)和2例LAMS近端再狭窄(2.9%)。没有死亡病例归因于LAMS放置。尽管经验仍在不断积累,但由食管胃十二指肠镜或EUS引导放置LAMS对于良性难治性GI狭窄来说是一种技术上可行且安全的手术,临床效果良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2f6/6033762/a11420291fd7/AnnGastroenterol-31-425-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验