Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Eur J Orthod. 2019 Aug 8;41(4):346-359. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy048.
Theoretically, root resorption could be modulated by any medication taken that exhibits possible effects on the implicated molecular pathways.
To systematically investigate and appraise the quality of the available evidence from animal studies, regarding the effect of commonly prescribed systemic medication on root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement.
Search without restrictions in eight databases (PubMed, Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Arab World Research Source, ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global) and hand searching until April 2018 took place. One author developed detailed search strategies for each database that were based on the PubMed strategy and adapted accordingly.
Controlled studies investigating the effect of systemic medications on root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement.
Following study retrieval and selection, relevant data were extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE's Risk of Bias Tool.
Twenty-one studies were finally identified, most of which at unclear risk of bias. Root resorption was shown to increase in Vitamin C treated animals in comparison with the control group, whereas a comparative decrease was noted after the administration of the alendronate, ibuprofen, growth hormone, low doses of meloxicam, simvastatin, lithium chloride and strontium ranelate. No difference was noted for acetaminophen, aspirin, fluoxetine, atorvastatin, misoprostol, zoledronic acid and zinc. Finally, inconsistent effects were observed after the administration of celecoxib, prednisolone and L-thyroxine. The quality of the available evidence was considered at best as low.
The pharmaceutical substances investigated were shown to exhibit variable effects on root resorption. Although the overall quality of evidence provides the clinician with a cautious perspective on the strength of the relevant recommendations, good practice would suggest that it is important to identify patients consuming medications and consider the possible implications.
PROSPERO (CRD42017078208).
理论上,任何可能影响涉及分子途径的药物都可以调节根吸收。
系统地调查和评估动物研究中现有证据的质量,了解常用全身药物对正畸牙齿移动相关根吸收的影响。
在 2018 年 4 月之前,在八个数据库(PubMed、Central、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、SCOPUS、Web of Science、Arab World Research Source、ClinicalTrials.gov、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global)中进行无限制搜索,并进行手工搜索。一位作者为每个数据库开发了详细的搜索策略,该策略基于 PubMed 策略并进行了相应的调整。
调查全身性药物对正畸牙齿移动相关根吸收影响的对照研究。
在检索和选择研究后,提取相关数据,并使用 SYRCLE 的偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。
最终确定了 21 项研究,其中大多数研究的偏倚风险不明确。与对照组相比,维生素 C 处理的动物的根吸收增加,而给予阿伦膦酸盐、布洛芬、生长激素、低剂量美洛昔康、辛伐他汀、氯化锂和雷奈酸锶后,根吸收减少。对乙酰氨基酚、阿司匹林、氟西汀、阿托伐他汀、米索前列醇、唑来膦酸和锌则没有差异。最后,在给予塞来昔布、泼尼松龙和左甲状腺素后,观察到不一致的效果。现有证据的质量被认为是最低的。
所研究的药物对根吸收有不同的影响。尽管整体证据质量为临床医生提供了一个谨慎的角度来看待相关建议的强度,但良好的实践建议是,识别服用药物的患者并考虑可能的影响很重要。
PROSPERO(CRD42017078208)。