• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证一种用于测量临床麻醉教育环境的工具。

Developing and validating a tool for measuring the educational environment in clinical anesthesia.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, North Shore Hospital, 124 Shakespeare Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0620, New Zealand.

Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;65(11):1228-1239. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1185-0. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1007/s12630-018-1185-0
PMID:29992467
Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to develop a contemporary measure for anesthesia teaching and learning in the operating theatre that was applicable to a variety of training jurisdictions, the Measure for the Anaesthesia Theatre Educational Environment (MATE).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature and modified Delphi approach was used to identify items for content validity. Reliability and exploratory factor analyses were conducted after a pilot survey of trainees to show construct validity, with removal of redundant items. Item domains were identified through a global assessment of factor structure accuracy and relation to real-world constructs.

RESULTS

Literature review generated an initial 73-item list. A modified Delphi approach with 24 experts identified 44 relevant items. The pilot survey generated 390 responses. Reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and global assessment refined the measure to 33 items. Four domains were identified according to factor structure: teaching preparation and practice, assessment and feedback, procedures and responsibility, and overall atmosphere. The educational environment was rated by trainees at 74.6 ± 15.6% with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.975).

CONCLUSION

The MATE survey tool generated valid and reliable scores when measuring the educational environment in the operating theatre. Further research is required to investigate possible differences between the training countries and age of junior doctors and the associated underlying factors. Other researchers are invited to administer the survey and share results within a central database.

摘要

目的

我们旨在开发一种适用于各种培训司法管辖区的手术室麻醉教学当代衡量标准,即麻醉手术室教育环境衡量标准(MATE)。

方法

采用系统文献回顾和改良 Delphi 方法确定内容效度的项目。在对学员进行试点调查后,进行可靠性和探索性因素分析,以显示构建效度,并删除冗余项目。通过对因子结构准确性和与现实结构的关系进行全面评估,确定项目领域。

结果

文献综述产生了最初的 73 个项目列表。24 名专家的改良 Delphi 方法确定了 44 个相关项目。试点调查产生了 390 个回复。可靠性分析、探索性因素分析和全面评估将该衡量标准精炼至 33 个项目。根据因子结构确定了四个领域:教学准备和实践、评估和反馈、程序和责任以及整体氛围。学员对教育环境的评价为 74.6±15.6%,具有极好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α=0.975)。

结论

当在手术室测量教育环境时,MATE 调查工具可产生有效且可靠的分数。需要进一步研究以调查培训国家和初级医生年龄之间可能存在的差异以及相关的潜在因素。邀请其他研究人员进行调查,并在中央数据库中共享结果。

相似文献

1
Developing and validating a tool for measuring the educational environment in clinical anesthesia.开发和验证一种用于测量临床麻醉教育环境的工具。
Can J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;65(11):1228-1239. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1185-0. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
2
Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation.一种用于测量医学生对评估环境认知的工具的开发:初步验证
Med Educ Online. 2015 Oct 27;20:28612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28612. eCollection 2015.
3
Measuring the anaesthesia clinical learning environment at the department level is feasible and reliable.在系一级衡量麻醉临床学习环境是可行和可靠的。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):733-739. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex037.
4
Analysis of psychometric properties of the modified SETQ tool in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中改良版SETQ工具的心理测量特性分析
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0893-4.
5
Development of the Awareness of Cultural Safety Scale: A pilot study with midwifery and nursing academics.文化安全意识量表的开发:一项针对助产和护理专业学者的试点研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Sep;44:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 21.
6
Validation of the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) in a sample of 731 Greek residents.在731名希腊住院医师样本中对研究生医院教育环境量表(PHEEM)进行验证。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 30;8:734. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1720-9.
7
Development and validation of the Readiness to Train Assessment Tool (RTAT).培训准备评估工具(RTAT)的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 28;21(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06406-3.
8
Development and Validation of an Assessment of Regional Anesthesia Ultrasound Interpretation Skills.区域麻醉超声解读技能评估的开发与验证
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):306-14. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000236.
9
Development of valid and reliable tools for student evaluation of teaching.开发用于学生教学评价的有效且可靠的工具。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 May;10(5):549-557. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
Anatomy education environment measurement inventory: A valid tool to measure the anatomy learning environment.解剖学教育环境测评量表:一种有效测评解剖学学习环境的工具。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Sep;10(5):423-432. doi: 10.1002/ase.1683. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The clinical learning environment in anaesthesiology in Kerala---Is it good enough?---A web-based survey.喀拉拉邦麻醉学的临床学习环境——是否足够良好?——一项基于网络的调查。
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;65(3):234-240. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1422_20. Epub 2021 Mar 13.