Fontela Paula Caitano, Forgiarini Luiz Alberto, Friedman Gilberto
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Pneumológicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biociências e Reabilitação e Reabilitação e Inclusão, Centro Universitário Metodista IPA - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):187-194. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180037.
To investigate the knowledge of multi-professional staff members about the early mobilization of critically ill adult patients and identify attitudes and perceived barriers to its application.
A cross-sectional study was conducted during the second semester of 2016 with physicians, nursing professionals and physical therapists from six intensive care units at two teaching hospitals. Questions were answered on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed as proportions of professionals who agreed or disagreed with statements. The chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to investigate differences in the responses according to educational/training level, previous experience with early mobilization and years of experience in intensive care units.
The questionnaire was answered by 98 out of 514 professionals (response rate: 19%). The acknowledged benefits of early mobilization were maintenance of muscle strength (53%) and shortened length of mechanical ventilation (83%). Favorable attitudes toward early mobilization included recognition that its benefits for patients under mechanical ventilation exceed the risks for both patients and staff, that early mobilization should be routinely performed via nursing and physical therapy protocols, and readiness to change the parameters of mechanical ventilation and reduce sedation to facilitate the early mobilization of patients. The main barriers mentioned were the unavailability of professionals and time to mobilize patients, excessive sedation, delirium, risk of musculoskeletal self-injury and excessive stress at work.
The participants were aware of the benefits of early mobilization and manifested attitudes favorable to its application. However, the actual performance of early mobilization was perceived as a challenge, mainly due to the lack of professionals and time, excessive sedation, delirium, risk of musculoskeletal self-injury and excessive stress at work.
调查多专业工作人员对成年危重症患者早期活动的认知,并确定其应用的态度和感知障碍。
2016年第二学期,对两家教学医院六个重症监护病房的医生、护理专业人员和物理治疗师进行了一项横断面研究。问题采用5分李克特量表回答,并分析同意或不同意陈述的专业人员比例。采用卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验,根据教育/培训水平、早期活动的既往经验和重症监护病房的工作年限,调查回答的差异。
514名专业人员中有98人回答了问卷(回复率:19%)。早期活动公认的益处包括维持肌肉力量(53%)和缩短机械通气时间(83%)。对早期活动的积极态度包括认识到其对机械通气患者的益处超过对患者和工作人员的风险,早期活动应通过护理和物理治疗方案常规进行,以及愿意改变机械通气参数并减少镇静以促进患者早期活动。提到的主要障碍是缺乏专业人员和时间来活动患者、镇静过度、谵妄、肌肉骨骼自我损伤风险和工作压力过大。
参与者意识到早期活动的益处,并表现出对其应用的积极态度。然而,早期活动的实际实施被视为一项挑战,主要原因是缺乏专业人员和时间、镇静过度、谵妄、肌肉骨骼自我损伤风险和工作压力过大。