• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

天普汀 25-50 毫克治疗老年复发性重度抑郁症患者的疗效:8 周安慰剂和依地普仑对照研究。

Efficacy of Tianeptine 25-50 mg in Elderly Patients With Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder: An 8-Week Placebo- and Escitalopram-Controlled Study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Clinical Bldg Fransie van Zyl Ave, Parow, Cape Town 8000 South Africa.

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Parow, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 3;79(4):17m11741. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11741.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.17m11741
PMID:29995359
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of treatment with tianeptine 25-50 mg/d in elderly patients suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) according to DSM-IV-TR. Escitalopram 5-10 mg/d was used as an active comparator.

METHODS

Elderly outpatients aged at least 65 years with a primary diagnosis of moderate to severe episode of recurrent MDD were recruited by psychiatrists in 44 clinical centers in 10 countries from October 2013 to January 2016. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tianeptine (n = 105), placebo (n = 107), or escitalopram (n = 99) for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS₁₇) total score.

RESULTS

Tianeptine improved depressive symptoms, as evaluated by the HDRS₁₇ total score in terms of absolute change from baseline (week 0) to week 8 (placebo-tianeptine difference [SE] of 3.84 [0.85] points, P < .001, using a last-observation-carried-forward approach) and response to treatment (tianeptine: 46.7%; placebo: 34.0%, estimate [SE] = 12.70% [6.70], P = .06). A sensitivity analysis using a mixed model for repeated measures confirmed the main results on HDRS total s​core. The placebo-tianeptine difference (SE) was 0.66 (0.15) for Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.96; P < .001) and 0.57 (0.14) for Clinical Global Impressions- Improvement (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.83; P < .001). Positive results were also obtained with the active control escitalopram (HDRS₁₇ total score placebo-escitalopram difference of 4.09 ± 0.86 points, P < .001), therefore validating the sensitivity of the studied population. Tianeptine was well tolerated, with only minimal differences in tolerability from placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides robust evidence that an 8-week treatment period with tianeptine 25-50 mg is efficacious and well tolerated in depressed patients aged 65 years or older.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT identifier: 2012-005612-26​.

摘要

目的

本安慰剂对照研究根据 DSM-IV-TR 评估了 8 周替奈普汀 25-50mg/d 治疗老年重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的疗效和安全性。艾司西酞普兰 5-10mg/d 用作活性对照。

方法

2013 年 10 月至 2016 年 1 月,来自 10 个国家的 44 个临床中心的精神科医生招募了年龄至少 65 岁且原发性诊断为中重度复发性 MDD 的老年门诊患者。患者被随机分配接受替奈普汀(n=105)、安慰剂(n=107)或艾司西酞普兰(n=99)治疗 8 周。主要结局测量是 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS₁₇)总分。

结果

替奈普汀改善了抑郁症状,根据从基线(第 0 周)到第 8 周的 HDRS₁₇ 总分的绝对变化(替奈普汀-安慰剂差值为 3.84 [0.85],P<0.001,采用最后观察值结转方法)和治疗反应(替奈普汀:46.7%;安慰剂:34.0%,估计值[SE]=12.70%[6.70],P=0.06)。使用重复测量混合模型进行的敏感性分析证实了 HDRS 总分的主要结果。替奈普汀-安慰剂差值(SE)为 0.66(0.15),用于临床总体印象-疾病严重程度(95%CI,0.37 至 0.96;P<0.001)和 0.57(0.14),用于临床总体印象-改善(95%CI,0.30 至 0.83;P<0.001)。阳性结果也在活性对照艾司西酞普兰中得到(HDRS₁₇ 总分替奈普汀-艾司西酞普兰差值为 4.09±0.86,P<0.001),因此验证了研究人群的敏感性。替奈普汀耐受性良好,与安慰剂相比仅有微小的耐受性差异。

结论

本研究提供了有力证据,表明替奈普汀 25-50mg 治疗 8 周可有效治疗 65 岁及以上的抑郁患者,且耐受性良好。

试验注册

EudraCT 标识符:2012-005612-26。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Tianeptine 25-50 mg in Elderly Patients With Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder: An 8-Week Placebo- and Escitalopram-Controlled Study.天普汀 25-50 毫克治疗老年复发性重度抑郁症患者的疗效:8 周安慰剂和依地普仑对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 3;79(4):17m11741. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11741.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study in adult outpatients.艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效及耐受性:一项针对成年门诊患者的为期6周的多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、活性药物对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2319-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.014.
3
Bupropion extended release compared with escitalopram: effects on sexual functioning and antidepressant efficacy in 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.安非他酮缓释剂与艾司西酞普兰对比:两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中对性功能及抗抑郁疗效的影响
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 May;67(5):736-46. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0507.
4
[Value of tianeptine in treating major recurrent unipolar depression. Study versus placebo for 16 1/2 months of treatment].[噻奈普汀治疗复发性重度单相抑郁症的价值。与安慰剂对照进行16个半月的治疗研究]
Encephale. 1997 Jan-Feb;23(1):56-64.
5
Double-blind comparison of escitalopram and duloxetine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.艾司西酞普兰与度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症急性期的双盲对照研究
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(7):481-92. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727070-00005.
6
Escitalopram in the treatment of adolescent depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension trial.艾司西酞普兰治疗青少年抑郁症:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的延长期试验。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2013 Sep;23(7):468-80. doi: 10.1089/cap.2012.0023.
7
Do equivalent doses of escitalopram and citalopram have similar efficacy? A pooled analysis of two positive placebo-controlled studies in major depressive disorder.等量的艾司西酞普兰和西酞普兰疗效相似吗?对两项关于重度抑郁症的阳性安慰剂对照研究的汇总分析。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 May;19(3):149-55. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200405000-00005.
8
Improvement in subjective and objective neurocognitive functions in patients with major depressive disorder: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized trial of tianeptine versus escitalopram, the CAMPION study.重度抑郁症患者主观和客观神经认知功能的改善:一项为期12周的多中心随机试验,比较噻奈普汀与艾司西酞普兰,即CAMPION研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;34(2):218-25. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000072.
9
Efficacy and safety of tianeptine in major depression: evidence from a 3-month controlled clinical trial versus paroxetine.噻奈普汀治疗重度抑郁症的疗效与安全性:一项为期3个月的与帕罗西汀对照的临床试验证据
CNS Drugs. 2002;16(1):65-75. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200216010-00005.
10
Escitalopram in the treatment of adolescent depression: a randomized placebo-controlled multisite trial.艾司西酞普兰治疗青少年抑郁症:一项随机安慰剂对照多中心试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;48(7):721-729. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181a2b304.

引用本文的文献

1
Beneficial and harmful effects of tricyclic antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.三环类抗抑郁药治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的有益和有害作用:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jan 22;27(1):e300730. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300730.
2
Current evidence and future perspectives in the exploration of sleep-related eating disorder-a systematic literature review.睡眠相关进食障碍探索的当前证据与未来展望——一项系统文献综述
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 30;15:1393337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1393337. eCollection 2024.
3
Antidepressants available in Japan for older people with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
日本用于治疗老年重性抑郁障碍的抗抑郁药:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2024 Mar;44(1):267-271. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12422. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
4
At the Crossroads between Eating Disorders and Body Dysmorphic Disorders-The Case of Bigorexia Nervosa.饮食失调与身体变形障碍的交叉路口——肌肉畸形症的案例
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 24;13(9):1234. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091234.