• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价利福昔明-α在英国管理肝性脑病患者的成本效益。

Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of rifaximin-α for the management of patients with hepatic encephalopathy in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

a Pharmatelligence , Cardiff , UK.

b Norgine Pharmaceuticals Limited , Harefield, Uxbridge , UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Nov;34(11):2001-2008. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1499506. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2018.1499506
PMID:29995455
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Rifaximin-α 550 mg twice daily plus lactulose has demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence of episodes of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) and the risk of hepatic encephalopathy (HE)-related hospitalizations compared with lactulose alone. This analysis estimated the cost effectiveness of rifaximin-α 550 mg twice daily plus lactulose versus lactulose alone in United Kingdom (UK) cirrhotic patients with OHE.

METHOD

A Markov model was built to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The perspective was that of the UK National Health Service (NHS). Clinical data was sourced from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and an open-label maintenance study in cirrhotic patients in remission from recurrent episodes of OHE. Health-related utility was estimated indirectly from disease-specific quality of life RCT data. Resource use data describing the impact of rifaximin-α on hospital admissions and length of stay for cirrhotic patients with OHE was from four single-center UK audits. Costs (2012) were derived from published sources; costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5%. The base-case time horizon was 5 years.

RESULTS

The average cost per patient was £22,971 in the rifaximin-α plus lactulose arm and £23,545 in the lactulose arm, a saving of £573. The corresponding values for benefit were 2.35 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and 1.83 QALYs per person, a difference of 0.52 QALYs. This translated into a dominant base-case ICER. Key parameters that impacted the ICER included number of hospital admissions and length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Rifaximin-α 550 mg twice daily in patients with recurrent episodes of OHE was estimated to generate cost savings and improved clinical outcomes compared to standard care over 5 years.

摘要

目的

与单独使用乳果糖相比,利福昔明-α 550mg,每日两次联合乳果糖可降低显性肝性脑病(OHE)发作的复发率和肝性脑病(HE)相关住院风险。本分析评估了利福昔明-α 550mg,每日两次联合乳果糖与单独使用乳果糖治疗英国(UK)肝硬化伴 OHE 患者的成本效果。

方法

建立 Markov 模型以估计增量成本效果比(ICER)。该分析的观点是英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的观点。临床数据来源于一项随机对照试验(RCT)和一项开放标签维持研究,纳入的是缓解复发性 OHE 发作的肝硬化患者。健康相关效用通过来自特定疾病生活质量 RCT 数据的间接方法来估计。描述利福昔明-α对肝硬化伴 OHE 患者住院和住院时间影响的资源使用数据来自四项英国单中心审计。成本(2012 年)来自已发表的资料;成本和效益以 3.5%贴现。基本情况的时间范围为 5 年。

结果

利福昔明-α联合乳果糖组患者的平均每人费用为 22971 英镑,乳果糖组为 23545 英镑,节省了 573 英镑。相应的效益值为 2.35 个质量调整生命年(QALY)和每人 1.83 个 QALY,差值为 0.52 QALY。这转化为基本情况的主导 ICER。影响 ICER 的关键参数包括住院次数和住院时间。

结论

与标准治疗相比,利福昔明-α 550mg,每日两次治疗复发性 OHE 患者在 5 年内估计可节省成本并改善临床结局。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of rifaximin-α for the management of patients with hepatic encephalopathy in the United Kingdom.评价利福昔明-α在英国管理肝性脑病患者的成本效益。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Nov;34(11):2001-2008. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1499506. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Rifaximin Treatment in Patients with Hepatic Encephalopathy.利福昔明治疗肝性脑病患者的成本效益分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jun;26(6):750-757. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.6.750.
3
The cost-effectiveness and budget impact of competing therapies in hepatic encephalopathy - a decision analysis.肝性脑病中竞争性疗法的成本效益和预算影响——一项决策分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Oct 15;26(8):1147-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03464.x.
4
Diagnosis and treatment of minimal hepatic encephalopathy to prevent motor vehicle accidents: a cost-effectiveness analysis.诊断和治疗轻微肝性脑病以预防机动车事故:成本效益分析。
Hepatology. 2012 Apr;55(4):1164-71. doi: 10.1002/hep.25507.
5
Hospitalizations and healthcare costs associated with rifaximin versus lactulose treatment among commercially insured patients with hepatic encephalopathy in the United States.美国商业保险患者肝性脑病中利福昔明与乳果糖治疗相关的住院治疗和医疗费用。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):202-211. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1877148.
6
Systematic Review of the Economic Burden of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy and Pharmacoeconomic Impact of Rifaximin.系统评价肝性脑病显性经济负担及利福昔明的药物经济学影响
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jul;36(7):809-822. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0641-6.
7
Budget impact of optimizing rifaximin-α use for the prevention of recurrent hepatic encephalopathy in The Netherlands.优化利福昔明-α在荷兰预防复发性肝性脑病的预算影响。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):1149-1163. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1983291.
8
Long-term management of hepatic encephalopathy with lactulose and/or rifaximin: a review of the evidence.乳果糖和/或利福昔明对肝性脑病的长期管理:证据综述
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;31(4):434-450. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001311.
9
Management of hepatic encephalopathy in the hospital.医院中肝性脑病的管理。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Feb;89(2):241-53. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
10
Efficacy of rifaximin versus lactulose for reducing the recurrence of overt hepatic encephalopathy and hopitalizations in cirrhosis.利福昔明与乳果糖在降低肝硬化患者显性肝性脑病复发率及住院率方面的疗效比较
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2012 Oct-Dec;116(4):1021-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to Lactulose Adherence in Patients with Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy.肝硬化和肝性脑病患者服用乳果糖的障碍。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jun;68(6):2389-2397. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07935-z. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
2
Is rifaximin better than nonabsorbable disaccharides in hepatic encephalopathy?: A meta-analysis.利福昔明优于非吸收性二糖治疗肝性脑病吗?一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28232. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028232.