• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A Clarification on Causal Questions: We Ask Them More Often Than We Realize.

作者信息

Kezios Katrina L, Hayes-Larson Eleanor

机构信息

Katrina L. Kezios and Eleanor Hayes-Larson are PhD students in the Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2018 Aug;108(8):e4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304547.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304547
PMID:29995464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6050847/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
A Clarification on Causal Questions: We Ask Them More Often Than We Realize.关于因果问题的澄清：我们提出这些问题的频率比我们意识到的要高。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Aug;108(8):e4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304547.
2
[Temporal sequence in observational studies to establish causality].[观察性研究中确定因果关系的时间顺序]
Medwave. 2014 May 2;14(4):e5944. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2014.04.5944.
3
Concordance with known causal effects is a potential validity measure for observational studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
4
Causal Inference From Observational Data: New Guidance From Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Journals.基于观察性数据的因果推断：来自肺科、重症医学和睡眠领域期刊的新指南。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):1-2. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003531.
5
[What are the propensity scores?].[倾向评分是什么？]
Rev Med Chil. 2016 Mar;144(3):364-70. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872016000300012.
6
Can Sophisticated Study Designs With Regression Analyses of Observational Data Provide Causal Inferences?采用观察性数据回归分析的复杂研究设计能否提供因果推断？
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 1;78(3):244-246. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2588.
7
Causality and causal inference in epidemiology: the need for a pluralistic approach.流行病学中的因果关系与因果推断：多元方法的必要性。
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 1;45(6):1776-1786. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv341.
8
Causal inference from observational data and target trial emulation.基于观察性数据的因果推断与目标试验模拟
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Nov;30(11):1415-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
9
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.观察性研究中因果推断的靶向最大似然估计
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 1;185(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww165. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
10
Causal interpretation of correlational studies - Analysis of medical news on the website of the official journal for German physicians.相关性研究的因果推断 - 对德国医生官方期刊网站上医学新闻的分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196833. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Comorbidities and apolipoprotein E genotypes of patients with mild cognitive impairment in transition to Alzheimer's disease.向阿尔茨海默病转变的轻度认知障碍患者的共病情况及载脂蛋白E基因型
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2025 Sep 12;9:25424823251353209. doi: 10.1177/25424823251353209. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Is the Way Forward to Step Back? Documenting the Frequency With Which Study Goals Are Misaligned With Study Methods and Interpretations in the Epidemiologic Literature.是否应该退一步，寻求前进之路？记录流行病学文献中研究目标与研究方法和解释之间不一致的频率。
Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Jan 14;43(1):4-18. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxab008.

本文引用的文献

1
Start With the "C-Word," Follow the Roadmap for Causal Inference.从“因果关系”这个词入手，遵循因果推断的路线图。
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):621. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304358.
2
Moving Beyond the Cause Constraint: A Public Health of Consequence, May 2018.超越病因限制：后果的公共卫生，2018年5月
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):602-603. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304390.
3
The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data.C 字当头：科学委婉语无助于从观察性数据中进行因果推断。
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):616-619. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304337. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
4
For and Against Methodologies: Some Perspectives on Recent Causal and Statistical Inference Debates.赞成与反对方法论：对近期因果推断和统计推断争议的一些观点。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):3-20. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0230-6. Epub 2017 Feb 20.