Suppr超能文献

美国各地区胞浆内单精子注射利用率的时间差异。

Temporal Differences in Utilization of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Among U.S. Regions.

机构信息

Dartmouth-Hitchcock and the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; the University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri; and Clinical Outcomes Research Group, CORG LLC, Grantham, New Hampshire.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;132(2):310-320. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002730.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze changes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) utilization, indications, and outcomes across U.S. regions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Data sets for 2000-2014 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinics with 100 or greater fresh, nondonor cycles were grouped by 10 nationally recognized Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regions and were compared for use of ICSI, frequency of male factor infertility, preimplantation genetic therapies, pregnancy, and live birth rates per cycle among fresh in vitro fertilization cycles in women younger than 35 years of age.

RESULTS

Nationwide ICSI utilization increased 52% (46.3±6.1% to 70.0±7.1%) from 2000 to 2014, whereas pregnancy and live birth rates per cycle modestly increased by 8.5% (39.2±3.8% to 42.5±2.5%) and 7.6% (34.4±3.6% to 37±2.6%), respectively, showing a positive correlation (r=0.78, P<.001; r=0.76, P=.001) with ICSI rates per clinic. All DHHS Services regions demonstrated increases in ICSI utilization over time, although the magnitude of increase varied in different regions. Regions also had similarities in trends for pregnancy and live birth rates per cycle in women younger than 35 years. There was no correlation between male factor and ICSI rates per clinic from 2000 to 2010 (r=0.32, P=.33) or 2011 to 2014 (r=0.85, P=.068). From 2007 to 2014, ICSI and preimplantation genetic testing did not demonstrate a strong correlation (r=0.68, P=.062).

CONCLUSION

From 2000 to 2014, ICSI rates per clinic significantly varied among geographic regions. Increased use of ICSI did not correlate with an increase in male factor diagnoses. These findings suggest that ICSI may be overused, because its use is not accompanied by proportionate increases in medical indications or effectiveness.

摘要

目的

分析美国各地区胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)应用、适应证和结局的变化。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究。数据来自疾病控制与预防中心 2000-2014 年的数据集。将 100 个或更多新鲜非供体周期的诊所按 10 个美国卫生与公众服务部(DHHS)公认区域分组,并对其进行比较,比较内容包括:35 岁以下女性新鲜体外受精周期中 ICSI 的应用、男性因素不孕的频率、植入前遗传治疗、妊娠和活产率。

结果

2000 年至 2014 年,全国范围内 ICSI 的使用率增加了 52%(46.3±6.1%至 70.0±7.1%),而每个周期的妊娠率和活产率分别适度增加了 8.5%(39.2±3.8%至 42.5±2.5%)和 7.6%(34.4±3.6%至 37.0±2.6%),呈正相关(r=0.78,P<.001;r=0.76,P=.001),与每个诊所的 ICSI 使用率相关。所有 DHHS 服务地区的 ICSI 使用率均随时间推移而增加,尽管不同地区的增幅有所不同。在 35 岁以下女性中,各地区的妊娠率和活产率的趋势也具有相似性。2000 年至 2010 年(r=0.32,P=.33)或 2011 年至 2014 年(r=0.85,P=.068),男性因素与每个诊所的 ICSI 使用率之间没有相关性。2007 年至 2014 年,ICSI 和植入前遗传检测之间没有很强的相关性(r=0.68,P=.062)。

结论

2000 年至 2014 年,各地区诊所的 ICSI 使用率差异显著。ICSI 的应用增加与男性因素诊断的增加无关。这些发现表明,ICSI 可能被过度使用,因为其使用并未伴随着医学适应证或效果的相应增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验