Health & Life Sciences Faculty Research Centre, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Department of Nephrology, University Hospital, Coventry, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0200354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200354. eCollection 2018.
Exercise capacity is reduced in chronic kidney failure (CKF). Intra-dialytic cycling is beneficial, but comorbidity and fatigue can prevent this type of training. Low-frequency electrical muscle stimulation (LF-EMS) of the quadriceps and hamstrings elicits a cardiovascular training stimulus and may be a suitable alternative. The main objectives of this trial were to assess the feasibility and efficacy of intra-dialytic LF-EMS vs. cycling.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: Assessor blind, parallel group, randomized controlled pilot study with sixty-four stable patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Participants were randomized to 10 weeks of 1) intra-dialytic cycling, 2) intra-dialytic LF-EMS, or 3) non-exercise control. Exercise was performed for up to one hour three times per week. Cycling workload was set at 40-60% oxygen uptake (VO2) reserve, and LF-EMS at maximum tolerable intensity. The control group did not complete any intra-dialytic exercise. Feasibility of intra-dialytic LF-EMS and cycling was the primary outcome, assessed by monitoring recruitment, retention and tolerability. At baseline and 10 weeks, secondary outcomes including cardio-respiratory reserve, muscle strength, and cardio-arterial structure and function were assessed.
Fifty-one (of 64 randomized) participants completed the study (LF-EMS = 17 [77%], cycling = 16 [80%], control = 18 [82%]). Intra-dialytic LF-EMS and cycling were feasible and well tolerated (9% and 5% intolerance respectively, P = 0.9). At 10-weeks, cardio-respiratory reserve (VO2 peak) (Difference vs. control: LF-EMS +2.0 [95% CI, 0.3 to 3.7] ml.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.02, and cycling +3.0 [95% CI, 1.2 to 4.7] ml.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.001) and leg strength (Difference vs. control: LF-EMS, +94 [95% CI, 35.6 to 152.3] N, P = 0.002 and cycling, +65.1 [95% CI, 6.4 to 123.8] N, P = 0.002) were improved. Arterial structure and function were unaffected.
Ten weeks of intra-dialytic LF-EMS or cycling improved cardio-respiratory reserve and muscular strength. For patients who are unable or unwilling to cycle during dialysis, LF-EMS is a feasible alternative.
慢性肾功能衰竭(CKF)患者的运动能力降低。血液透析过程中的室内骑行是有益的,但合并症和疲劳会阻止这种类型的训练。股四头肌和腘绳肌的低频电肌肉刺激(LF-EMS)会引发心血管训练刺激,可能是一种合适的替代方法。本试验的主要目的是评估血液透析过程中的 LF-EMS 与骑行的可行性和疗效。
设计、设置、参与者和测量:评估者盲法、平行组、随机对照试验,纳入 64 名稳定接受维持性血液透析的患者。参与者被随机分为三组,每组 10 周:1)血液透析过程中的室内骑行,2)血液透析过程中的 LF-EMS,或 3)非运动对照组。运动时间为每周三次,每次最多一小时。骑行的工作量设定为 40-60%的耗氧量(VO2)储备,LF-EMS 则设定为最大耐受强度。对照组在血液透析过程中不进行任何运动。血液透析过程中的 LF-EMS 和骑行的可行性是主要的结局指标,通过监测招募、保留和耐受性来评估。在基线和 10 周时,评估了包括心肺储备、肌肉力量以及心血管结构和功能在内的次要结局。
51 名(64 名随机患者中的)参与者完成了研究(LF-EMS = 17 [77%],骑行 = 16 [80%],对照组 = 18 [82%])。血液透析过程中的 LF-EMS 和骑行都是可行的,且耐受性良好(分别有 9%和 5%的患者不耐受,P = 0.9)。在 10 周时,心肺储备(VO2 峰值)(与对照组相比,LF-EMS 组增加了+2.0[95%CI,0.3 至 3.7]ml.kg-1.min-1,P = 0.02,骑行组增加了+3.0[95%CI,1.2 至 4.7]ml.kg-1.min-1,P = 0.001)和腿部力量(与对照组相比,LF-EMS 组增加了+94[95%CI,35.6 至 152.3]N,P = 0.002,骑行组增加了+65.1[95%CI,6.4 至 123.8]N,P = 0.002)均有改善。动脉结构和功能没有受到影响。
血液透析过程中的 10 周 LF-EMS 或骑行都能提高心肺储备和肌肉力量。对于不能或不愿在透析期间骑行的患者,LF-EMS 是一种可行的替代方法。