Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Nov;8(11):1308-1314. doi: 10.1002/alr.22177. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
Although nasal congestion is among the most common symptoms in subjects suffering from nasal diseases, relatively few data on normal airflow resistance are available for reference, especially in healthy Chinese subjects. The aim of present study was therefore to objectively measure the normal airflow resistance by rhinomanometry, and calculate mean and standard reference intervals in a cohort of healthy Chinese subjects.
A total of 1084 participants were recruited in Huairou region in Beijing, China from November to December 2011. All participants were required to complete 2 questionnaires and undergo nasal examination and objective assessment of nasal resistance by rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry.
A total of 704 adults completed both questionnaires and nasal examinations; with 505 (71.73%) subjects considered "healthy" based on negative medical history, absence of nasal symptoms, and normal findings by nasal examination. The mean total nasal resistance in the congested nose was 0.168 Pa/cm /sec (95% CI, 0.068 to 0.268 Pa/cm /sec) at 75 Pa pressure and 0.243 Pa/cm /sec (95% CI, 0.112 to 0.374 Pa/cm /sec) at 150 Pa pressure. The mean total nasal resistance in males was significantly lower compared to females at 75 Pa and 150 Pa (p < 0.001). The mean unilateral nasal resistance was 0.357 Pa/cm /sec (95% CI, 0.034 to 0.680 Pa/cm /sec) at 75 Pa and 0.511 Pa/cm /sec (95% CI, 0.086 to 0.936 Pa/cm /sec) at 150 Pa, with no significant difference between males and females. Application of a vasoconstrictor decreased both total and unilateral nasal resistance, which was significant at 75 Pa.
These reference values maybe useful for the Chinese clinicians in evaluating the nasal function and in choosing and assessing efficacy of therapy for nasal congestion in Chinese patients.
尽管鼻塞是患有鼻部疾病的患者最常见的症状之一,但可供参考的正常气流阻力数据相对较少,尤其是在健康的中国受试者中。因此,本研究旨在通过鼻阻力测量法客观测量正常气流阻力,并计算健康中国受试者的平均和标准参考区间。
2011 年 11 月至 12 月,我们在北京怀柔区招募了 1084 名受试者。所有受试者均需完成 2 份问卷,并接受鼻检查和鼻阻力测量法及声反射鼻测量法的客观评估。
共有 704 名成年人完成了这两份问卷和鼻部检查;根据阴性病史、无鼻部症状以及鼻部检查正常的结果,有 505 名(71.73%)受试者被认为“健康”。在 75 Pa 压力下,充血侧鼻腔总鼻阻力的平均值为 0.168 Pa/cm/s(95%CI:0.068 至 0.268 Pa/cm/s),在 150 Pa 压力下为 0.243 Pa/cm/s(95%CI:0.112 至 0.374 Pa/cm/s)。在 75 Pa 和 150 Pa 时,男性的总鼻阻力平均值明显低于女性(p < 0.001)。单侧鼻腔阻力的平均值为 0.357 Pa/cm/s(95%CI:0.034 至 0.680 Pa/cm/s),在 75 Pa 时为 0.511 Pa/cm/s(95%CI:0.086 至 0.936 Pa/cm/s),男女之间无显著差异。血管收缩剂的应用降低了总鼻阻力和单侧鼻阻力,在 75 Pa 时差异有统计学意义。
这些参考值可能有助于中国临床医生评估鼻腔功能,并选择和评估中国患者鼻塞的治疗效果。