Gu G Z, Yu S F, Wu H, Zhou W H, Kang L, Chen R
Henan Provincial Institute for Occupational Health, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2018 May 20;36(5):347-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2018.05.006.
To explore relationship between depressive symptoms and occupational stress in locomotive drivers. By using cluster sampling method, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 1413 train drivers (including passenger train drivers301, freight train drivers 683, passenger shunting train drivers350, and high speed train drivers79) from a railway bureau. The individual factors, depression, occupational stress, strains, personalities, coping strategy and social support were measured using occupational stress instruments, job content questionnaire and effort-reward imbalance questionnaire. CThe differences of depression scores between take exercise and don't exercise groups were statistical significance (<0.01) . The differences of depression scores among different age, length of service, job category, educational status,marital status, smoking and drinking groups were`t statistical significance (>0.05) .Correlation analysis revealed that depression score was related negatively to reward, job satisfaction, self-esteem, promotion opportunities, working stability and positively emotions score (<0.01) , related positively to sleep disorders, effort, physiological needs, psychological need, daily stress, negative emotions, social support, esponsibility for person, responsibility for thing, conflict in the group, role conflict, role ambiguity score (<0.01) . Nonparametric test analysis found that train drivers with high depression score reported higher psychological need, effort, promotion opportunities, role ambiguity, role conflict, conflict between groups, responsibility for person, responsibility for thing, physiological needs, daily stress, negative emotions, social support and copping strategies than those with moderate and lower depression score (<0.01) , but the scores of job satisfaction, reword, self-esteem, working stability, positive emotions were lower than other groups those with moderate and lower depression score (<0.01) . Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the risk of depression for drivers with more sleep disorder, low social support more than three times as high as that for drivers with few sleep disorder, hing social support (=3.615,3.266) .High negative emotions, more psychological need, high daily stress were more than twice times as high as that for drivers with low negative emotions, few psychological need, low daily stress (:2.444、2.489、2.065) . sleep disorder, low social support and job stress had larger effect on depression. To improve sleep, social support, self-esteem and decrease job stress and negative emotions are main measures of decrease depression for train drivers.
探讨机车司机抑郁症状与职业压力之间的关系。采用整群抽样方法,对某铁路局的1413名火车司机(包括301名客运列车司机、683名货运列车司机、350名调车客运列车司机和79名高速列车司机)进行横断面研究。使用职业压力量表、工作内容问卷和付出-回报失衡问卷对个体因素、抑郁、职业压力、紧张、个性、应对策略和社会支持进行测量。锻炼组与不锻炼组的抑郁得分差异具有统计学意义(<0.01)。不同年龄、工作年限、工作类别、教育程度、婚姻状况、吸烟和饮酒组的抑郁得分差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。相关分析显示,抑郁得分与回报、工作满意度、自尊、晋升机会、工作稳定性和积极情绪得分呈负相关(<0.01),与睡眠障碍、努力程度、生理需求、心理需求、日常压力、消极情绪、社会支持、对人的责任、对事的责任、群体冲突、角色冲突、角色模糊得分呈正相关(<0.01)。非参数检验分析发现,抑郁得分高的火车司机在心理需求、努力程度、晋升机会、角色模糊、角色冲突、群体间冲突、对人的责任、对事的责任、生理需求、日常压力、消极情绪、社会支持和应对策略方面的得分高于中度和低度抑郁得分的火车司机(<0.01),但工作满意度、回报、自尊、工作稳定性、积极情绪得分低于中度和低度抑郁得分的其他组(<0.01)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,睡眠障碍较多、社会支持较低的司机患抑郁症的风险是睡眠障碍较少、社会支持较高的司机的3倍多(=3.615,3.266)。消极情绪较高、心理需求较多、日常压力较大的司机患抑郁症的风险是消极情绪较低、心理需求较少、日常压力较小的司机的2倍多(:2.444、2.489、2.065)。睡眠障碍、社会支持较低和工作压力对抑郁症的影响较大。改善睡眠、社会支持、自尊,降低工作压力和消极情绪是降低火车司机抑郁的主要措施。