• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察肯尼亚免费产院服务政策的实施情况:混合方法的过程评价。

Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation.

机构信息

Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

Institute of Healthcare Management, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):603-613. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135
PMID:29996580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6037504/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kenya introduced a free maternity policy in 2013 to address the cost barrier associated with accessing maternal health services. We carried out a mixed methods process evaluation of the policy to examine the extent to which the policy had been implemented according to design, and positive experiences and challenges encountered during implementation.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods study in 3 purposely selected counties in Kenya. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) with policy-makers at the national level, health managers at the county level, and frontline staff at the health facility level (n=60), focus group discussions (FGDs) with community representatives (n=10), facility records, and document reviews. We analysed the data using a framework approach.

RESULTS

Rapid implementation led to inadequate stakeholder engagement and confusion about the policy. While the policy was meant to cover antenatal visits, deliveries, and post-natal visits, in practice the policy only covered deliveries. While the policy led to a rapid increase in facility deliveries, this was not matched by an increase in health facility capacity and hence compromised quality of care. The policy led to an improvement in the level of revenues for facilities. However, in all three counties, reimbursements were not made on time. The policy did not have a system of verifying health facility reports on utilization of services.

CONCLUSION

The Kenyan Ministry of Health (MoH) should develop a formal policy on the free maternity services, and provide clear guidelines on its content and implementation arrangements, engage with and effectively communicate the policy to stakeholders, ensure timeliness of payment disbursement to healthcare facilities, and introduce a mechanism for verifying utilization reports prepared by healthcare providers. User fee removal policies such as free maternity programmes should be accompanied by supply side capacity strengthening.

摘要

背景

肯尼亚于 2013 年推出了免费产妇政策,以解决获得产妇保健服务的费用障碍。我们对该政策进行了混合方法的过程评估,以检查该政策在多大程度上按照设计实施,以及在实施过程中遇到的积极经验和挑战。

方法

我们在肯尼亚的 3 个选定县进行了一项混合方法研究。通过对国家一级的决策者、县一级的卫生管理人员以及卫生机构一级的一线工作人员(n=60)进行深入访谈(IDIs)、对社区代表进行焦点小组讨论(FGDs)(n=10)、对机构记录和文件进行审查,收集了数据。我们使用框架方法对数据进行了分析。

结果

快速实施导致利益攸关方参与不足和对政策的混淆。虽然该政策旨在涵盖产前检查、分娩和产后检查,但实际上仅涵盖分娩。虽然该政策导致医疗机构分娩量迅速增加,但医疗机构的能力并没有相应增加,因此影响了护理质量。该政策导致了医疗机构收入水平的提高。然而,在这三个县,报销都没有及时发放。该政策没有建立一个核实医疗机构服务利用情况的报告系统。

结论

肯尼亚卫生部(MoH)应制定一项关于免费产妇服务的正式政策,并就其内容和实施安排提供明确的指导方针,与利益攸关方进行接触并有效地沟通政策,确保及时向医疗机构支付款项,并引入一个核实医疗机构提供的利用报告的机制。取消用户付费政策,如免费产妇计划,应同时加强供应方的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e2/6037504/e1a105a860c1/ijhpm-7-603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e2/6037504/e959e0fe38ef/ijhpm-7-603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e2/6037504/0f493939929b/ijhpm-7-603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e2/6037504/e1a105a860c1/ijhpm-7-603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e2/6037504/e959e0fe38ef/ijhpm-7-603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e2/6037504/0f493939929b/ijhpm-7-603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e2/6037504/e1a105a860c1/ijhpm-7-603-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation.考察肯尼亚免费产院服务政策的实施情况:混合方法的过程评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):603-613. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135.
2
Assessing the community-level impact of a decade of user fee policy shifts on health facility deliveries in Kenya, 2003-2014.评估肯尼亚十年来用户收费政策转变对卫生机构分娩的社区层面影响,2003-2014 年。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 25;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0774-4.
3
Effects of implementing free maternity service policy in Kenya: an interrupted time series analysis.肯尼亚实施免费产务政策的效果:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4462-x.
4
Healthcare service providers' and facility administrators' perspectives of the free maternal healthcare services policy in Malindi District, Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚马林迪区医疗服务提供者和医疗机构管理人员对免费孕产妇医疗服务政策的看法:一项定性研究
Reprod Health. 2015 Jun 27;12:59. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0048-1.
5
Understanding Women's Choices: How Women's Perceptions of Quality of Care Influences Place of Delivery in a Rural Sub-County in Kenya. A Qualitative Study.理解女性的选择:肯尼亚农村县下女性对护理质量的认知如何影响分娩地点。一项定性研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Nov;25(11):1787-1797. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03214-3. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
Examining the quality of care across the continuum of maternal care (antenatal, perinatal and postnatal care) under the expanded free maternity policy (Linda Mama Policy) in Kenya: a mixed-methods study.在肯尼亚扩大的免费产妇政策(Linda Mama 政策)下,检查整个孕产妇护理连续体(产前、围产期和产后护理)的护理质量:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 2;14(5):e082011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082011.
7
Impact of free maternity policies in Kenya: an interrupted time-series analysis.肯尼亚免费生育政策的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003649.
8
Implementation challenges of free maternity services policy in Kenya: the health workers' perspective.肯尼亚免费孕产妇服务政策的实施挑战:卫生工作者的视角
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Dec 16;22:375. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.22.375.6708. eCollection 2015.
9
Perspectives of stakeholders of the free maternity services for mothers in western Kenya: lessons for universal health coverage.肯尼亚西部免费母婴服务利益相关者的观点:全民健康覆盖的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07632-z.
10
"If there are no female nurses to attend to me, I will just go and deliver at home": a qualitative study in Garissa, Kenya.如果没有女护士照顾我,我就干脆在家里分娩": 肯尼亚加里萨的一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Sep 10;19(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2477-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers of healthcare financing modalities for universal maternal healthcare services in East Africa: a qualitative systematic review.东非普及孕产妇保健服务的医疗融资模式的促进因素和障碍:一项定性系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13010-2.
2
"Trying not to be seen": a qualitative study exploring adolescent girls' experiences seeking antenatal care in a Nairobi informal settlement.“试图不被人看见”:一项质性研究,探索内罗毕一个非正式定居点中少女寻求产前护理的经历
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 5;15(6):e093696. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093696.
3
Enhancing Intersectoral Collaboration in Maternal Healthcare for the Realization of Universal Health Coverage in Kenya: The Perspectives of Health Facility Administrators in Kilifi County, Kenya.

本文引用的文献

1
Recentralization within decentralization: County hospital autonomy under devolution in Kenya.分权中的重新集权:肯尼亚权力下放背景下的县医院自主权
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182440. eCollection 2017.
2
Assessing the impoverishing effects, and factors associated with the incidence of catastrophic health care payments in Kenya.评估肯尼亚灾难性医疗支出的致贫影响及相关因素。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Feb 6;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0526-x.
3
Determining the effective coverage of maternal and child health services in Kenya, using demographic and health survey data sets: tracking progress towards universal health coverage.
加强肯尼亚孕产妇保健领域的部门间合作以实现全民健康覆盖:肯尼亚基利菲县医疗机构管理人员的观点
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 14;22(4):610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040610.
4
Digital Health Convergence Workshop: The Kenyan experience.数字健康融合研讨会:肯尼亚的经验
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2024 Apr 9;2:oqae014. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqae014. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploring parental knowledge, care-seeking, and support strategies for neonatal illness: an integrative review of the African Great Lakes region.探索新生儿疾病的家长知识、寻求护理及支持策略:对非洲大湖地区的综合综述
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2450137. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2450137. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
6
Using knowledge translation to support the use of evaluation findings: A case study of the linda mama free maternity program in Kenya.运用知识转化来支持评估结果的应用:肯尼亚琳达妈妈免费孕产妇项目的案例研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 12;4(12):e0003961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003961. eCollection 2024.
7
Policy formulation and actor roles in the expanded Kenyan free maternity policy (Linda Mama): A policy analysis.肯尼亚扩大后的免费孕产妇政策(琳达妈妈)中的政策制定与行为主体角色:一项政策分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;4(11):e0002796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002796. eCollection 2024.
8
Can "the expanded free maternity services" enable Kenya to achieve universal health coverage by 2030: qualitative study on experiences of mothers and healthcare providers.“扩大的免费孕产妇服务”能否使肯尼亚在2030年前实现全民健康覆盖:关于母亲和医疗服务提供者经历的定性研究
Front Health Serv. 2024 Sep 10;4:1325247. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1325247. eCollection 2024.
9
Examining the quality of care across the continuum of maternal care (antenatal, perinatal and postnatal care) under the expanded free maternity policy (Linda Mama Policy) in Kenya: a mixed-methods study.在肯尼亚扩大的免费产妇政策(Linda Mama 政策)下,检查整个孕产妇护理连续体(产前、围产期和产后护理)的护理质量:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 2;14(5):e082011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082011.
10
Maternal anaemia care in Kano state, Nigeria: an exploratory qualitative study of experiences of uptake and provision.尼日利亚卡诺州产妇贫血护理:一项关于接受和提供情况的探索性定性研究。
F1000Res. 2023 Dec 6;12:288. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.130980.1. eCollection 2023.
利用人口与健康调查数据集确定肯尼亚妇幼保健服务的有效覆盖范围:追踪全民健康覆盖的进展情况。
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Apr;22(4):442-453. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12841. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
4
Hospitals as complex adaptive systems: A case study of factors influencing priority setting practices at the hospital level in Kenya.医院作为复杂适应系统:肯尼亚医院层面影响优先事项设定实践的因素案例研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;174:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.026. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
5
Setting healthcare priorities: a description and evaluation of the budgeting and planning process in county hospitals in Kenya.确定医疗保健优先事项:肯尼亚县级医院预算编制和规划过程的描述与评估
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Apr 1;32(3):329-337. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw132.
6
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
7
Protocol for the process evaluation of interventions combining performance-based financing with health equity in Burkina Faso.布基纳法索将基于绩效的融资与健康公平相结合的干预措施的过程评估方案。
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 12;9:149. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0149-1.
8
Effects of user fee exemptions on the provision and use of maternal health services: a review of literature.免除用户费用对孕产妇保健服务提供和使用的影响:文献综述
J Health Popul Nutr. 2013 Dec;31(4 Suppl 2):67-80.
9
Removing user fees for facility-based delivery services: a difference-in-differences evaluation from ten sub-Saharan African countries.取消基于设施的分娩服务的用户费用:来自撒哈拉以南非洲十个国家的双重差分评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2015 May;30(4):432-41. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu027. Epub 2014 May 10.
10
Assessing the elimination of user fees for delivery services in Laos.评估老挝分娩服务取消用户费用的情况。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 14;9(3):e89784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089784. eCollection 2014.