• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在肯尼亚扩大的免费产妇政策(Linda Mama 政策)下,检查整个孕产妇护理连续体(产前、围产期和产后护理)的护理质量:一项混合方法研究。

Examining the quality of care across the continuum of maternal care (antenatal, perinatal and postnatal care) under the expanded free maternity policy (Linda Mama Policy) in Kenya: a mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Western Heights, The Mint Nairobi, M and E Advisory Group, Nairobi, Kenya.

Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 2;14(5):e082011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082011.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082011
PMID:38697765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11086406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kenya still faces the challenge of mothers and neonates dying from preventable pregnancy-related complications. The free maternity policy (FMP), implemented in 2013 and expanded in 2017 (Linda Mama Policy (LMP)), sought to address this challenge. This study examines the quality of care (QoC) across the continuum of maternal care under the LMP in Kenya.

METHODS

We conducted a convergent parallel mixed-methods study across multiple levels of the Kenyan health system, involving key informant interviews with national stakeholders (n=15), in-depth interviews with county officials and healthcare workers (HCWs) (n=21), exit interview survey with mothers (n=553) who utilised the LMP delivery services, and focus group discussions (n=9) with mothers who returned for postnatal visits (at 6, 10 and 14 weeks). Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. All the data were triangulated at the analysis and discussion stage using a framework approach guided by the QoC for maternal and newborns.

RESULTS

The results showed that the expanded FMP enhanced maternal care access: geographical, financial and service utilisation. However, the facilities and HCWs bore the brunt of the increased workload and burnout. There was a longer waiting time for the initial visit by the pregnant women because of the enhanced antenatal care package of the LMP. The availability and standards of equipment, supplies and infrastructure still posed challenges. Nurses were multitasking and motivated despite the human resources challenge. Mothers were happy to have received care information; however, there were challenges regarding respect and dignity they received (inadequate food, over-crowding, bed-sharing and lack of privacy), and they experienced physical, verbal and emotional abuse and a lack of attention/care.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing the negative aspects of QoC while strengthening the positives is necessary to achieve the Universal Health Coverage goals through better quality service for every woman.

摘要

背景

肯尼亚仍面临产妇和新生儿因可预防的与妊娠相关的并发症而死亡的挑战。2013 年实施的免费产妇政策(FMP),并于 2017 年扩大(琳达妈妈政策(LMP)),旨在解决这一挑战。本研究检查了肯尼亚 LMP 下孕产妇保健连续体的护理质量(QoC)。

方法

我们在肯尼亚卫生系统的多个层面上进行了一项收敛平行混合方法研究,涉及与国家利益相关者(n=15)的关键人物访谈、与县官员和医疗保健工作者(HCWs)(n=21)的深入访谈、利用 LMP 分娩服务的产妇(n=553)的退出访谈调查,以及与返回接受产后访视(第 6、10 和 14 周)的母亲进行的焦点小组讨论(n=9)。定量数据进行描述性分析,定性数据进行主题分析。在分析和讨论阶段,使用以孕产妇和新生儿护理质量为指导的框架方法对所有数据进行三角剖分。

结果

结果表明,扩大的 FMP 增加了获得产妇保健的机会:地理、财务和服务的利用。然而,设施和 HCWs 承担了增加工作量和倦怠的重担。由于 LMP 增强的产前保健套餐,孕妇的初次就诊等待时间更长。设备、用品和基础设施的可用性和标准仍然存在挑战。尽管面临人力资源挑战,护士还是承担了多项任务并保持积极性。母亲很高兴接受了护理信息;然而,她们在获得的尊重和尊严方面面临挑战(食物不足、过度拥挤、同床共枕和缺乏隐私),并遭受身体、言语和情感虐待以及缺乏关注/护理。

结论

在加强积极方面的同时解决 QoC 的负面方面,对于通过为每一位女性提供更好的服务质量实现全民健康覆盖目标是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6519/11086406/cc3a86468adf/bmjopen-2023-082011f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6519/11086406/ee1316f4745a/bmjopen-2023-082011f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6519/11086406/cc3a86468adf/bmjopen-2023-082011f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6519/11086406/ee1316f4745a/bmjopen-2023-082011f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6519/11086406/cc3a86468adf/bmjopen-2023-082011f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining the quality of care across the continuum of maternal care (antenatal, perinatal and postnatal care) under the expanded free maternity policy (Linda Mama Policy) in Kenya: a mixed-methods study.在肯尼亚扩大的免费产妇政策(Linda Mama 政策)下,检查整个孕产妇护理连续体(产前、围产期和产后护理)的护理质量:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 2;14(5):e082011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082011.
2
Perspectives of stakeholders of the free maternity services for mothers in western Kenya: lessons for universal health coverage.肯尼亚西部免费母婴服务利益相关者的观点:全民健康覆盖的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07632-z.
3
Can "the expanded free maternity services" enable Kenya to achieve universal health coverage by 2030: qualitative study on experiences of mothers and healthcare providers.“扩大的免费孕产妇服务”能否使肯尼亚在2030年前实现全民健康覆盖:关于母亲和医疗服务提供者经历的定性研究
Front Health Serv. 2024 Sep 10;4:1325247. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1325247. eCollection 2024.
4
Exploring the Adaptations of the Free Maternity Policy Implementation by Health Workers and County Officials in Kenya.探讨肯尼亚卫生工作者和县级官员在实施免费生育政策方面的适应情况。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Oct 30;11(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00083.
5
Barriers to formal health care seeking during pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal period: a qualitative study in Siaya County in rural Kenya.孕期、分娩期和产后期间寻求正规医疗保健的障碍:肯尼亚农村锡亚县的一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2485-2.
6
Persistent barriers to the use of maternal, newborn and child health services in Garissa sub-county, Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚加里萨县产妇、新生儿和儿童健康服务利用的持续障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 7;20(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02955-3.
7
"Attitude is the fifth delay": perspectives of obstetric near-miss survivors and health care professionals on continuity and coordination of maternal care.“态度是第五种延误”:产科近距 misses 幸存者和医疗保健专业人员对孕产妇保健连续性和协调性的看法。 (注:“near-miss”直译为“近距 misses”,可能是特定医学术语,这里保留原文形式,你可根据实际医学含义进行调整)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12341-4.
8
Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation.考察肯尼亚免费产院服务政策的实施情况:混合方法的过程评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):603-613. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135.
9
Is quality of care during childbirth consistent from admission to discharge? A qualitative study of delivery care in Uttar Pradesh, India.分娩期间的护理质量从入院到出院是否一致?印度北方邦分娩护理的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0204607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204607. eCollection 2018.
10
"A safe space"; A statewide evaluation of Midwifery Antenatal and Postnatal Service (MAPS) using the quality maternal newborn care, evidence informed framework."安全空间";利用质量产妇新生儿护理、循证框架对全州产前期和产后助产服务 (MAPS) 的评估。
Women Birth. 2024 Sep;37(5):101642. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101642. Epub 2024 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Health system responsiveness for maternal healthcare services in East Africa: a mixed-methods systematic review.东非孕产妇医疗服务的卫生系统响应性:一项混合方法的系统评价
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07995-1.
2
Determinants of health facility choice for delivery among women participating in group antenatal care in Machakos county, kenya: A cross-sectional survey.肯尼亚马查科斯县参加集体产前护理的妇女分娩时选择医疗机构的决定因素:一项横断面调查。
Reprod Health. 2025 Aug 22;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02107-w.
3
Major Factors Contributing to Positive and Negative Childbirth Experiences in Pregnant Women Living with HIV.

本文引用的文献

1
Policy formulation and actor roles in the expanded Kenyan free maternity policy (Linda Mama): A policy analysis.肯尼亚扩大后的免费孕产妇政策(琳达妈妈)中的政策制定与行为主体角色:一项政策分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;4(11):e0002796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002796. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring the Adaptations of the Free Maternity Policy Implementation by Health Workers and County Officials in Kenya.探讨肯尼亚卫生工作者和县级官员在实施免费生育政策方面的适应情况。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Oct 30;11(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00083.
3
Local perspectives on policy implementation of free maternity health services in Kenya: Implications for universal health coverage.
影响感染艾滋病毒孕妇分娩经历好坏的主要因素。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;15(4):442. doi: 10.3390/bs15040442.
4
Exploring the barriers to accessing antenatal care at the primary health care center level of a tertiary hospital in Lebanon: a qualitative study.探索黎巴嫩一家三级医院基层医疗中心产前护理的获取障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12444-y.
5
Policy formulation and actor roles in the expanded Kenyan free maternity policy (Linda Mama): A policy analysis.肯尼亚扩大后的免费孕产妇政策(琳达妈妈)中的政策制定与行为主体角色:一项政策分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;4(11):e0002796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002796. eCollection 2024.
肯尼亚免费产妇保健服务政策实施的地方视角:对全民健康覆盖的影响。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2023 May;27(5s):71-81. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2023/v27i5s.9.
4
Does a free maternity policy in Kenya work? Impact and cost-benefit consideration based on demographic health survey data.肯尼亚的免费产妇政策是否有效?基于人口健康调查数据的影响和成本效益考虑。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Feb;25(1):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01575-w. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
5
Investing in the health workforce in Kenya: trends in size, composition and distribution from a descriptive health labour market analysis.投资肯尼亚卫生人力:从描述性卫生劳动力市场分析看规模、构成和分布趋势。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009748.
6
Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review.免费产妇政策对护理质量、成本和结果的影响:综合评价。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Sep 15;22:e43. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000529.
7
Examining the implementation of the Linda Mama free maternity program in Kenya.考察肯尼亚琳达妈妈免费孕产妇方案的实施情况。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Nov;36(6):2277-2296. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3298. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
8
Impact of free maternity policies in Kenya: an interrupted time-series analysis.肯尼亚免费生育政策的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003649.
9
'We just look at the well-being of the baby and not the money required': a qualitative study exploring experiences of quality of maternity care among women in Nairobi's informal settlements in Kenya.“我们只关注婴儿的健康,而不考虑所需费用”:一项定性研究,探索肯尼亚内罗毕非正式定居点女性的孕产妇护理质量体验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 6;10(9):e036966. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036966.
10
Patient satisfaction with peri-partum care at Bertha Gxowa district hospital, South Africa.南非 Bertha Gxowa 地区医院围产期护理的患者满意度。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020 Aug 13;12(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2409.