• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从持续输注芬太尼转为危重症患者的氢吗啡酮。

Transition From Continuous Infusion Fentanyl to Hydromorphone in Critically Ill Patients.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2020 Apr;33(2):129-135. doi: 10.1177/0897190018786832. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1177/0897190018786832
PMID:29996718
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2013 Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients recommend intravenous opioids as first-line therapy to treat nonneuropathic pain. There is a paucity of literature describing possible benefits of utilizing specific opioids over others in ICU patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to identify rationales for the transition from continuous infusion fentanyl to continuous infusion hydromorphone in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, observational analysis of adult ICU patients who were transitioned from fentanyl to hydromorphone. The major end point was to characterize the primary reason for transition. Minor end points included secondary reason(s) for transition, transition dosing, changes in continuous sedative requirements, and level of sedation.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included in the analysis. The primary rationale for transition was ventilator compliance (28.3%), followed by tachyphylaxis or better pain control (19.6%), and reduction in sedatives (13.0%). The most common secondary reason(s) for transition included reduction in sedatives (47.8%), opioid rotation (32.6%), and obesity (30.4). Median fentanyl rate of 100 µg/h was transitioned to 1 mg/h of hydromorphone. The percentage of patients requiring the use of continuous sedatives was decreased in the 24 hours following transition ( .005); however, patients were more deeply sedated ( = .02).

CONCLUSION

Rationales for transition were to improve ventilator compliance, optimize patient-specific pharmacokinetics, and limit overall sedative exposure.

摘要

背景

2013 年危重病医学会成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理指南建议静脉内使用阿片类药物作为治疗非神经性疼痛的一线治疗药物。目前文献中很少有描述 ICU 患者使用特定阿片类药物优于其他药物的可能益处。

目的

本研究旨在确定从持续输注芬太尼转换为持续输注氢吗啡酮在危重症患者中的合理理由。

方法

这是一项对从芬太尼转换为氢吗啡酮的成年 ICU 患者进行的单中心、前瞻性、观察性分析。主要终点是确定转换的主要原因。次要终点包括转换的次要原因、转换剂量、连续镇静剂需求的变化以及镇静水平。

结果

共纳入 46 例患者进行分析。转换的主要理由是呼吸机顺应性(28.3%),其次是耐药或更好的疼痛控制(19.6%)和镇静剂减少(13.0%)。最常见的次要转换原因包括减少镇静剂(47.8%)、阿片类药物转换(32.6%)和肥胖(30.4%)。中位数为 100µg/h 的芬太尼剂量转换为 1mg/h 的氢吗啡酮。转换后 24 小时内需要使用连续镇静剂的患者比例降低(.005);然而,患者的镇静程度更深( =.02)。

结论

转换的理由是改善呼吸机顺应性、优化患者特定药代动力学和限制总体镇静剂暴露。

相似文献

1
Transition From Continuous Infusion Fentanyl to Hydromorphone in Critically Ill Patients.从持续输注芬太尼转为危重症患者的氢吗啡酮。
J Pharm Pract. 2020 Apr;33(2):129-135. doi: 10.1177/0897190018786832. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
2
Comparison of Hydromorphone versus Fentanyl-based Sedation in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.羟吗啡酮与芬太尼类药物在体外膜肺氧合中的镇静作用比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2020 May;40(5):389-397. doi: 10.1002/phar.2385. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Clinical sedation scores as indicators of sedative and analgesic drug exposure in intensive care unit patients.临床镇静评分作为重症监护病房患者镇静和镇痛药物暴露的指标。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):218-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.005.
4
Hydromorphone Compared to Fentanyl in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.氢吗啡酮与体外膜肺氧合患者接受芬太尼的比较。
ASAIO J. 2021 Apr 1;67(4):443-448. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001253.
5
Clinical experience with transdermal and orally administered opioids in palliative care patients--a retrospective study.姑息治疗患者经皮和口服阿片类药物的临床经验——一项回顾性研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr;37(4):302-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hym017. Epub 2007 May 22.
6
Conversion From Continuous Infusion Fentanyl to Continuous Infusion Hydromorphone in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.儿科重症监护病房中从持续输注芬太尼到持续输注氢吗啡酮的转换。
Ann Pharmacother. 2021 Dec;55(12):1439-1446. doi: 10.1177/10600280211003170. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
7
Adjunct low-dose ketamine infusion vs standard of care in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients at a Tertiary Saudi Hospital (ATTAINMENT Trial): study protocol for a randomized, prospective, pilot, feasibility trial.在沙特一家三级医院中,对机械通气的危重症患者进行辅助性低剂量氯胺酮输注与标准治疗的比较(ATTAINMENT 试验):一项随机、前瞻性、初步、可行性试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Mar 20;21(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4216-4.
8
Opioid rotation from transdermal fentanyl to continuous subcutaneous hydromorphone in a cachectic patient: A case report and review of the literature.从透皮芬太尼到消瘦患者持续皮下氢吗啡酮的阿片类药物转换:病例报告和文献复习。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021 Jan;27(1):238-243. doi: 10.1177/1078155220929415. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
9
Opioid and sedative requirements in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients on hydromorphone versus fentanyl.体外膜肺氧合患者使用氢吗啡酮与芬太尼的阿片类药物和镇静剂需求。
Artif Organs. 2022 May;46(5):878-886. doi: 10.1111/aor.14125. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
10
Pain, fentanyl consumption, and delirium in adolescents after scoliosis surgery: dexmedetomidine vs midazolam.青少年脊柱侧弯手术后的疼痛、芬太尼用量及谵妄:右美托咪定与咪达唑仑的比较
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 May;23(5):446-52. doi: 10.1111/pan.12128. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Inadequate Cancer Pain Control after Switching High-Dose Fentanyl to Hydromorphone Injection: A Case Series Highlighting Issues with Conventional Conversion Ratios.从大剂量芬太尼转换为氢吗啡酮注射后癌症疼痛控制不足:一个突出传统转换比例问题的病例系列
Palliat Med Rep. 2025 Sep 1;6(1):408-414. doi: 10.1177/10966218251366061. eCollection 2025.
2
Pharmacokinetic Alterations Associated with Critical Illness.与危重病相关的药代动力学改变。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Feb;62(2):209-220. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01213-x. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3
Evaluation of Hypertriglyceridemia in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Receiving Propofol.
对接受丙泊酚治疗的2019冠状病毒病危重症患者高甘油三酯血症的评估
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jan 11;3(1):e0330. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000330. eCollection 2021 Jan.