Andriolo Luca, Crawford Dennis C, Reale Davide, Zaffagnini Stefano, Candrian Christian, Cavicchioli Alessia, Filardo Giuseppe
II Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Cartilage. 2020 Jul;11(3):273-290. doi: 10.1177/1947603518786557. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
The purpose of this manuscript is to analyze the evidence regarding etiopathogenesis of knee osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions through a systematic review, so to summate the current understanding of the origin and progression of this pathologic articular processes.
A systematic review of the literature was performed on the PubMed and Cochrane databases on October 2017 by 2 independent authors and included all levels of evidence. This included all English language literature, pertaining specifically to etiopathology of knee OCD with exclusions for review articles and expert opinion. Of 965 identified records, 154 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 86 studies met the inclusion criteria.
According to these studies, the etiology of OCD can be of a biological or mechanical origin: 40 articles proposed a biological hypothesis, including genetic causes (27), ossification center deficit (12), and endocrine disorders (9); conversely, 52 articles supported a mechanical hypothesis, including injury/overuse (18), tibial spine impingement (5), discoid meniscus (16), and biomechanical alterations (20) as the cause of the onset of OCD. The pathogenic processes were investigated by 36 of these articles, with a focus on subchondral bone fracture and ischemia as the ultimate events leading to OCD.
Biological and mechanical factors are found to result in subchondral bone remodeling alterations, acting independently or more likely synergically in the progression of knee OCD. The former includes genetic causes, deficit of ossification centers and endocrine disorders; the latter, tibial spine impingement, discoid meniscus, and biomechanical alterations, together with injuries and overuse. The resultant subchondral bone ischemia and/or fracturing appears to determine the onset and progression of OCD.
Systematic review of level II-IV studies, level IV.
本文旨在通过系统评价分析有关膝关节剥脱性骨软骨炎(OCD)病变病因发病机制的证据,从而总结目前对这种病理性关节过程的起源和进展的认识。
2017年10月,两名独立作者在PubMed和Cochrane数据库上对文献进行了系统评价,纳入了所有证据级别。这包括所有英文文献,专门针对膝关节OCD的病因病理学,排除综述文章和专家意见。在965条识别记录中,评估了154篇全文文章的 eligibility,86项研究符合纳入标准。
根据这些研究,OCD的病因可能是生物学或机械性的:40篇文章提出了生物学假说,包括遗传原因(27篇)、骨化中心缺陷(12篇)和内分泌紊乱(9篇);相反,52篇文章支持机械假说,包括损伤/过度使用(18篇)、胫骨棘撞击(5篇)、盘状半月板(16篇)和生物力学改变(20篇)作为OCD发病的原因。其中36篇文章研究了致病过程,并将重点放在软骨下骨骨折和缺血作为导致OCD的最终事件上。
发现生物学和机械因素会导致软骨下骨重塑改变,在膝关节OCD的进展中独立起作用或更可能协同起作用。前者包括遗传原因、骨化中心缺陷和内分泌紊乱;后者包括胫骨棘撞击、盘状半月板和生物力学改变,以及损伤和过度使用。由此产生的软骨下骨缺血和/或骨折似乎决定了OCD的发生和进展。
II-IV级研究的系统评价,IV级。