• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伸手和行走成本如何影响运动路径选择?

How do reaching and walking costs affect movement path selection?

作者信息

Potts Cory Adam, Callahan-Flintoft Chloe, Rosenbaum David A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 439 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2018 Oct;236(10):2727-2737. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5327-y. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-018-5327-y
PMID:30003295
Abstract

Although reaching and walking are commonly coordinated, their coordination has been little studied. We investigated decision-making related to reaching and walking in connection with a recently discovered phenomenon called pre-crastination-the tendency to expend extra effort in the service of hastening goal or sub-goal completion. In the earlier studies where pre-crastination was discovered, participants decided which of two buckets to carry to the end of a walkway, picking the bucket they thought was easier. Surprisingly, the majority of participants chose to carry the bucket that was closer to the start position, which meant that the bucket they chose had to be carried farther than the bucket they did not choose. Here we inquired into participants' sensitivity to reaching effort and walking effort by varying how far participants had to reach to pick up a bucket, how heavy the bucket was, and how far participants had to walk with the bucket they chose. We found that participants were willing to lean and reach far to pick up an empty bucket that was a shorter walk from the start position. However, as reaching costs and carrying costs increased, participants prioritized shorter reaches over shorter walking distances. The results show that although pre-crastination is a robust tendency, there are limits to the kinds of costs people are willing to incur to complete sub-goals as soon as possible.

摘要

尽管伸手够物和行走通常是协调进行的,但它们之间的协调性却鲜有研究。我们结合最近发现的一种名为“提前拖延”的现象,对与伸手够物和行走相关的决策进行了调查。“提前拖延”是指为了加速目标或子目标的完成而额外付出努力的倾向。在早期发现“提前拖延”现象的研究中,参与者要决定将两个桶中的哪一个搬到人行道尽头,他们会选择自己认为更轻的桶。令人惊讶的是,大多数参与者选择搬运离起始位置更近的桶,这意味着他们选择的桶要比未选择的桶搬运得更远。在这里,我们通过改变参与者伸手够桶的距离、桶的重量以及搬运所选桶行走的距离,来探究参与者对伸手够物的努力和行走的努力的敏感度。我们发现,参与者愿意倾斜身体并伸长手臂去够一个离起始位置较近且行走距离较短的空桶。然而,随着伸手够物的成本和搬运成本的增加,参与者会优先选择较短的伸手够物距离而非较短的行走距离。结果表明,尽管“提前拖延”是一种强烈的倾向,但人们为了尽快完成子目标而愿意承担的成本类型是有限的。

相似文献

1
How do reaching and walking costs affect movement path selection?伸手和行走成本如何影响运动路径选择?
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Oct;236(10):2727-2737. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5327-y. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
2
Pre-crastination: hastening subgoal completion at the expense of extra physical effort.预先拖延:以额外体力消耗为代价加速子目标完成。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jul;25(7):1487-96. doi: 10.1177/0956797614532657. Epub 2014 May 8.
3
Pre-crastination and procrastination effects occur in a reach-to-grasp task.预拖延和拖延效应在伸手抓握任务中出现。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 May;237(5):1129-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05493-3. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
4
Starting or finishing sooner? Sequencing preferences in object transfer tasks.开始或结束得更早?物体转移任务中的顺序偏好。
Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1674-1684. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1022-7. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
5
Reaching while walking: reaching distance costs more than walking distance.边走边伸手:伸手距离比行走距离花费更多。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1100-4. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1100.
6
Pre-crastination across physical and cognitive tasks.跨越身体和认知任务的提前行动。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Mar;78(3):490-497. doi: 10.1177/17470218241246972. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
7
How are cognitive and physical difficulty compared?认知困难和身体困难如何比较?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):500-511. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1434-2.
8
Precrastination and the cognitive-load-reduction (CLEAR) hypothesis.拖延与认知负荷降低假说。
Memory. 2020 Jan;28(1):107-111. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1690001. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Which task will we choose first? Precrastination and cognitive load in task ordering.我们首先会选择哪项任务?任务排序中的提前拖延与认知负荷。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Feb;81(2):489-503. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1633-5.
10
The tiger on your tail: choosing between temporally extended behaviors.紧随其后的老虎:在时间延长的行为之间做出选择。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):855-60. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440459. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Upper and Lower Limb Movement Kinematics in Aging Gene Premutation Carriers.衰老基因前突变携带者的上肢和下肢运动学
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 24;11(1):13. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010013.
2
Pre-crastination and procrastination effects occur in a reach-to-grasp task.预拖延和拖延效应在伸手抓握任务中出现。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 May;237(5):1129-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05493-3. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Starting or finishing sooner? Sequencing preferences in object transfer tasks.开始或结束得更早?物体转移任务中的顺序偏好。
Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1674-1684. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1022-7. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
2
Pre-crastination in the pigeon.鸽子的提前行动。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1130-4. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0758-3.
3
Pre-crastination: hastening subgoal completion at the expense of extra physical effort.预先拖延:以额外体力消耗为代价加速子目标完成。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jul;25(7):1487-96. doi: 10.1177/0956797614532657. Epub 2014 May 8.
4
Whole-body posture planning in anticipation of a manual prehension task: prospective and retrospective effects.预期手动抓握任务时的全身姿势规划:前瞻性和回顾性影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
5
The tiger on your tail: choosing between temporally extended behaviors.紧随其后的老虎:在时间延长的行为之间做出选择。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):855-60. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440459. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
6
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.认知、动作和物体操控。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):924-46. doi: 10.1037/a0027839. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
7
Behavioral ecology meets motor behavior: choosing between walking and reaching paths.行为生态学与运动行为相遇:在行走路径和伸手够取路径之间做出选择。
J Mot Behav. 2011;43(2):131-6. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2010.548423.
8
Reaching while walking: reaching distance costs more than walking distance.边走边伸手:伸手距离比行走距离花费更多。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1100-4. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1100.
9
Behavioral characteristics and neurobiological substrates shared by Pavlovian sign-tracking and drug abuse.巴甫洛夫式信号追踪与药物滥用共有的行为特征和神经生物学基础。
Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jun;58(1):121-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.12.003. Epub 2007 Dec 28.
10
Coordination of locomotion and prehension.运动与抓握的协调。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jan;176(2):281-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0618-0.