Sankaran Neeraja
, Bangalore, India.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2018 Jul 12;40(3):41. doi: 10.1007/s40656-018-0206-1.
This paper considers the foundational role of the contagium vivum fluidum-first proposed by the Dutch microbiologist Martinus Beijerinck in 1898-in the history of virology, particularly in shaping the modern virus concept, defined in the 1950s. Investigating the cause of mosaic disease of tobacco, previously shown to be an invisible and filterable entity, Beijerinck concluded that it was neither particulate like the bacteria implicated in certain infectious diseases, nor soluble like the toxins and enzymes responsible for symptoms in others. He offered a completely new explanation, proposing that the agent was a "living infectious fluid" whose reproduction was intimately linked to that of its host cell. Difficult to test at the time, the contagium vivum fluidum languished in obscurity for more than three decades. Subsequent advances in technologies prompted virus researchers of the 1930s and 1940s-the first to separate themselves from bacteriologists-to revive the idea. They found in it both the seeds for their emerging virus concept and a way to bring hitherto opposing thought styles about the nature of viruses and life together in consensus. Thus, they resurrected Beijerinck as the founding father, and contagium vivum fluidum as the core concept of their discipline.
本文探讨了“传染性活液”(1898年由荷兰微生物学家马丁努斯·贝杰林克首次提出)在病毒学史上的基础性作用,尤其是在塑造20世纪50年代定义的现代病毒概念方面。在研究此前已被证明是一种不可见且可过滤的实体——烟草花叶病的病因时,贝杰林克得出结论,它既不像某些传染病中涉及的细菌那样是颗粒状的,也不像其他疾病中导致症状的毒素和酶那样是可溶的。他提出了一个全新的解释,认为病原体是一种“有生命的感染性液体”,其繁殖与宿主细胞的繁殖密切相关。由于当时难以验证,“传染性活液”在默默无闻中沉寂了三十多年。随后技术的进步促使20世纪30年代和40年代的病毒研究人员(第一批将自己与细菌学家区分开来的人)重新提出这一观点。他们在其中既发现了新兴病毒概念的种子,也找到了一种方法,使迄今为止关于病毒本质和生命的对立思维方式达成共识。于是,他们将贝杰林克奉为病毒学之父,将“传染性活液”奉为该学科的核心概念。