Caudwell Kim M, Mullan Barbara A, Hagger Martin S
Health Psychology and Behavioural Medicine Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia.
Int J Behav Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):592-604. doi: 10.1007/s12529-018-9736-x.
The present study tested the efficacy of a theory-based online intervention comprising motivational (autonomy support) and volitional (implementation intention) components to reduce pre-drinking alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm.
Undergraduate students (N = 202) completed self-report measures of constructs from psychological theories, pre-drinking alcohol consumption, and alcohol-related harm at baseline and were randomly assigned to one of four intervention conditions in a 2 (autonomy support: present/absent) × 2 (implementation intention: present/absent) design. Participants completed follow-up measures of all variables at 4 weeks post-intervention. All participants received national guidelines on alcohol consumption and an e-mail summary of intervention content at its conclusion. Participants also received weekly SMS messages in the 4-week post-intervention period restating content relevant to their intervention condition.
Neither statistically significant main effect for either the autonomy support or implementation intention intervention components nor an interaction effect was found on the outcome measures. However, statistically significant reductions in pre-drinking alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm were observed across all groups at follow-up, when compared to baseline.
Reductions in outcome measures were likely related to elements common to each condition (i.e., provision of national guidelines, assessment of outcome measures, e-mail summary, and SMS messages), rather than motivational and volitional components.
本研究测试了一种基于理论的在线干预措施的效果,该措施包括动机(自主支持)和意志(实施意图)成分,以减少饮酒前的酒精消费及与酒精相关的危害。
本科生(N = 202)在基线时完成了心理理论中各构念、饮酒前酒精消费及与酒精相关危害的自我报告测量,并被随机分配到2(自主支持:有/无)×2(实施意图:有/无)设计的四种干预条件之一。参与者在干预后4周完成了所有变量的随访测量。所有参与者在干预结束时都收到了国家酒精消费指南以及干预内容的电子邮件总结。参与者在干预后的4周内还每周收到短信,重申与他们的干预条件相关的内容。
在结果测量中,未发现自主支持或实施意图干预成分的统计学显著主效应,也未发现交互效应。然而,与基线相比,随访时所有组的饮酒前酒精消费及与酒精相关的危害均有统计学显著降低。
结果测量的降低可能与每种条件共有的因素有关(即提供国家指南、结果测量评估、电子邮件总结和短信),而非动机和意志成分。