Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Dec;79(6):1076-1080.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.062. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
We previously demonstrated that dermatology consultation substantially reduces the rates of misdiagnosis of cellulitis; however, broad implementation of dermatology consultation is impractical on account of existing practice patterns and reimbursement systems. Meanwhile, efforts to improve diagnostic accuracy have culminated in point-of-care tools, including the ALT-70 predictive model for lower extremity cellulitis and thermal imaging.
To prospectively evaluate the performance of the ALT-70 predictive model and thermal imaging in diagnosing lower extremity cellulitis in a head-to-head comparison.
We collected ALT-70 and thermal imaging data from patients with presumed lower extremity cellulitis and compared classification measures and accuracy for the ALT-70 predictive model, thermal imaging, and combination testing (ALT-70 predictive model plus thermal imaging).
We enrolled 67 patients with ALT-70 and thermal imaging data. The ALT-70 predictive model conferred the highest sensitivity (97.8%) and negative predictive value (90.9%), whereas combination testing had the highest specificity (71.4%) and positive predictive value (86.6%). The ALT-70 predictive model had improved classification measures compared with thermal imaging. Combination testing conferred a marginal benefit compared with the ALT-70 predictive model alone.
Single-center design may limit generalizability.
The ALT-70 predictive model outperformed thermal imaging in diagnosing lower extremity cellulitis. The accuracy of the ALT-70 predictive model was high and consistent with its performance in previously published literature. Broad implementation of the ALT-70 predictive model in clinical practice may decrease the rates of misdiagnosis of lower extremity cellulitis.
我们之前的研究表明,皮肤科会诊可显著降低蜂窝织炎的误诊率;然而,鉴于现有的实践模式和报销系统,广泛实施皮肤科会诊是不切实际的。与此同时,为提高诊断准确性所做的努力已经催生了即时护理工具,包括用于下肢蜂窝织炎的 ALT-70 预测模型和热成像。
前瞻性评估 ALT-70 预测模型和热成像在头对头比较中诊断下肢蜂窝织炎的性能。
我们收集了疑似下肢蜂窝织炎患者的 ALT-70 和热成像数据,并比较了 ALT-70 预测模型、热成像和联合检测(ALT-70 预测模型加热成像)的分类措施和准确性。
我们纳入了 67 例具有 ALT-70 和热成像数据的患者。ALT-70 预测模型的敏感性(97.8%)和阴性预测值(90.9%)最高,而联合检测的特异性(71.4%)和阳性预测值(86.6%)最高。与热成像相比,ALT-70 预测模型的分类措施有所提高。与单独使用 ALT-70 预测模型相比,联合检测仅略有优势。
单中心设计可能限制其普遍性。
在诊断下肢蜂窝织炎方面,ALT-70 预测模型优于热成像。ALT-70 预测模型的准确性较高,与之前发表的文献中的性能一致。在临床实践中广泛应用 ALT-70 预测模型可能会降低下肢蜂窝织炎的误诊率。