Suppr超能文献

骨髓源性单核细胞肌内注射治疗不可重建的外周动脉疾病无临床获益:一项 III 期随机对照试验结果。

No Clinical Benefit of Intramuscular Delivery of Bone Marrow-derived Mononuclear Cells in Nonreconstructable Peripheral Arterial Disease: Results of a Phase-III Randomized-controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):756-761. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002896.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Prospects for no-option, end-stage peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients remain poor. Although results from open and semiblinded studies fuel hope for cell-based strategies in no-option patients, so far conclusions from the available placebo-controlled studies are not supportive. With the intention to end the remaining controversy with regard to cell therapy for PAD we conducted a confirmatory, double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

STUDY DESIGN

This randomized controlled trial was registered (NCT00539266). Inclusion criteria included stable or progressive disabling PAD, no imminent need for amputation, absent accepted options for revascularization. Diabetic disease was an exclusion criterion. Bone marrow (500-700 mL) was harvested and bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells were concentrated to 40 mL. Concentrated cells or placebo (diluted blood) were intramuscularly injected at 40 locations of the calf muscle.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients (mean (sd) age 58.2 (14.2) yrs, 58% males) were randomized. Twenty-eight patients received BM-MNCs, 26 placebo. Baseline criteria were similar in the 2 groups. No significant differences were observed for the primary (number of amputations, (pain free) walking distance) and secondary outcome parameters (ankle brachial index, pain scores, quality of life (SF-36)).

DISCUSSION

This fully blinded replication trial of autologous BM-MNC fails to confirm a benefit for cell therapy in no-option PAD patients, consequently BM-MNC therapy should not be offered as a clinical treatment. Apparent contrasting conclusions from open and controlled studies underscore the importance of a controlled trial design in evaluating cell-based interventions in PAD.

摘要

背景和目的

对于没有选择的晚期外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者,前景仍然不佳。尽管来自开放和半盲研究的结果为无选择患者的细胞治疗策略带来了希望,但迄今为止,可用安慰剂对照研究的结论并不支持。为了结束细胞治疗 PAD 方面尚存的争议,我们进行了一项确证性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的 3 期试验。

研究设计

这项随机对照试验已注册(NCT00539266)。纳入标准包括稳定或进展性致残性 PAD、无即将截肢的需要、不存在可接受的血运重建选择。糖尿病是排除标准。采集骨髓(500-700ml),并浓缩骨髓源性单核细胞至 40ml。浓缩细胞或安慰剂(稀释血液)在小腿肌肉的 40 个部位肌肉内注射。

结果

54 名患者(平均(标准差)年龄 58.2(14.2)岁,58%为男性)被随机分组。28 名患者接受 BM-MNCs,26 名接受安慰剂。两组的基线标准相似。主要(截肢数量、(无痛)步行距离)和次要结局参数(踝肱指数、疼痛评分、生活质量(SF-36))均无显著差异。

讨论

这项针对自体 BM-MNC 的完全盲法复制试验未能证实细胞治疗对无选择 PAD 患者有益,因此不应将 BM-MNC 治疗作为临床治疗方法。开放和对照研究得出的明显不同的结论强调了在评估 PAD 中基于细胞的干预措施时,对照试验设计的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验