Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jul 13;37(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0800-9.
The natural history of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a continuous process with the vicious cycle of remission and recurrence. Because MCL cells are most vulnerable before their exposure to therapeutic agents, front-line therapy could eliminate MCL cells at the first strike, reduce the chance for secondary resistance, and cause long-term remissions. If optimized, it could become an alternative to cure MCL. The key is the intensity of front-line therapy. Both the Nordic 2 and the MD Anderson Cancer Center HCVAD trials, with follow-up times greater than 10 years, achieved long-term survivals exceeding 10 years. But the Achilles heel in both trials were the severe toxicities, such as secondary malignancies including myelodysplastic syndromes /leukemia. Therefore, intensive therapies can act as a double-edged sword providing long term survival at the cost of severe toxicities. In our opinion, although intensive chemotherapy can cause detrimental side effects, it is indispensable given that we run the risk of sacrificing long-term survivals in these young and fit patients. We must seek for a powerful alternative at the front-line. Furthermore, minimal residual disease negativity should be the optimal therapeutic goal to achieve before and after autologous stem cell transplantation. Some novel therapeutic strategies have shown to improve outcomes, but it is not yet clear as to how these results translate in population. Of note, MCL patients need to be stratified at diagnosis and be provided with different intensities of front-line regimen. In this review, we discuss current strategies for the treatment of young patients with newly diagnosed MCL.
套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)的自然病程是一个连续的过程,存在缓解和复发的恶性循环。由于 MCL 细胞在接触治疗药物之前最为脆弱,一线治疗可以在首次打击时消灭 MCL 细胞,降低继发耐药的机会,并带来长期缓解。如果能够优化,它可能成为治愈 MCL 的一种替代方法。关键在于一线治疗的强度。北欧 2 期和 MD 安德森癌症中心 HCVAD 试验的随访时间均超过 10 年,均实现了超过 10 年的长期生存。但这两项试验的软肋均是严重的毒性,如继发性恶性肿瘤,包括骨髓增生异常综合征/白血病。因此,强化治疗可以说是一把双刃剑,它可以提供长期生存,但代价是严重的毒性。在我们看来,虽然强化化疗可能会产生有害的副作用,但对于这些年轻且健康的患者,我们冒着牺牲长期生存的风险,这种治疗是不可或缺的。我们必须在一线治疗中寻找一种强有力的替代方法。此外,在自体干细胞移植前后,微小残留病阴性应成为最佳的治疗目标。一些新的治疗策略已经显示出改善预后的效果,但这些结果在人群中如何转化尚不清楚。值得注意的是,MCL 患者在诊断时需要进行分层,并给予不同强度的一线方案。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了目前治疗新诊断的年轻 MCL 患者的策略。