Suppr超能文献

评估一种新型自动筛选工具,用于确定是否有资格植入皮下植入式心律转复除颤器。

Evaluation of a novel automatic screening tool for determining eligibility for a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;272:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.037. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The manufacturer has developed a new ECG screening tool to determine eligibility for the subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD), the "automatic screening tool" (AST), which may render manual ECG-screening unnecessary. The aim of the study was to determine the eligibility for the S-ICD using two methods (manual ECG-screening versus AST) in different patient categories including patients with cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease and inherited primary arrhythmia syndrome.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the ECG suitability for an S-ICD in consecutive patients at our outpatient clinic between February and June 2017. The primary endpoint of the study was ECG eligibility defined as at least 1 successful vector in both supine and sitting postures.

RESULTS

A total of 254 patients (167 men; mean age 45 ± 16 years) were screened using both methods. Overall, there was a high ECG eligibility using either method (93% versus 92%, P = 0.45). Overall agreement between both methods was 94%. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) more often had a failed screening test using either test in comparison to the patients without HCM (manual: odds ratio [OR] 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-9.3, P = 0.02; AST: OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.6, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

AST showed a high agreement with manual ECG-screening for S-ICD. Overall there was a high ECG eligibility for S-ICD, although patients with HCM had a lower passing rate irrespective of the screening method.

摘要

背景

制造商开发了一种新的心电图筛查工具,用于确定皮下 ICD(S-ICD)的适用性,即“自动筛查工具”(AST),这可能使手动心电图筛查变得不必要。本研究的目的是在包括心肌病、先天性心脏病和遗传性原发性心律失常综合征在内的不同患者类别中,使用两种方法(手动心电图筛查与 AST)确定 S-ICD 的适用性。

方法

我们前瞻性评估了 2017 年 2 月至 6 月在我们门诊连续就诊的患者进行 S-ICD 的心电图适用性。该研究的主要终点是心电图的适用性,定义为在仰卧和坐姿两种体位下至少有 1 个成功的向量。

结果

共有 254 例患者(167 例男性;平均年龄 45±16 岁)接受了两种方法的筛查。总的来说,两种方法的心电图适用性都很高(93%与 92%,P=0.45)。两种方法之间的总体一致性为 94%。与无肥厚型心肌病(HCM)的患者相比,HCM 患者使用任何一种方法进行筛查时,其测试失败的可能性更高(手动:优势比[OR]3.3,95%置信区间[CI]1.2-9.3,P=0.02;AST:OR 3.0,95% CI 1.2-7.6,P=0.02)。

结论

AST 与手动 S-ICD 心电图筛查具有很高的一致性。总的来说,S-ICD 的心电图适用性很高,尽管 HCM 患者的通过率较低,与筛查方法无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验