Marc Maria-Gabriela, Bazert Cédric, Attal Jean-Pierre
Sous-section d'orthopédie dento-faciale, université de Bordeaux, 16-20, Cours de la Marne, 33082 Bordeaux cedex, France.
Sous-section d'orthopédie dento-faciale, université de Bordeaux, 16-20, Cours de la Marne, 33082 Bordeaux cedex, France.
Int Orthod. 2018 Sep;16(3):425-439. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
CONTEXT/OBJECTIVES: Clinical studies show a mean bond failure rate of orthodontic brackets, which ranges between 6% and 8%, with a predominance for the second mandibular premolars. The pre-coated flash-free adhesive ceramic brackets allow to obtain, according to their manufacturer, a low bond failure rate, while ensuring a simplified implementation. The aim of this study was to measure the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded with the direct method using a pre-coated flash-free adhesive system, and to compare it with the shear bond strength of the old generation precoated brackets and that of operator coated brackets to the buccal surface of the second mandibular premolars.
45-second mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were randomly distributed into 3 groups of 15 teeth each. In the first group, the brackets were precoated with the APC™ Flash-Free system (3M Unitek; in the second group, with the APC Plus system (3M Unitek), and in the third group, the brackets were bonded manually with the Transbond XT composite (3M Unitek). The enamel surface was prepared in the same way for the 3 groups: etching using 36% orthophosphoric acid, followed by the application of the Transbond XT primer adhesive (3M Unitek). Each sample was submitted to shear bond strength forces using a Universal Testing Machine LRX (Lloyd Instruments LTD., Fareham, UK) in shear mode with a crosshead speed of 1.0mm/min. The bond strength values of the brackets were recorded in megapascals (MPa) for each tooth. The mean values were then compared using the one-way ANOVA test.
Although the mean shear bond strength value for the APC Flash-Free group was lower than those of the two other groups, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.276).
Given the experimental conditions of this in vitro study, the shear bond strength of the brackets precoated with the APC Flash-Free system is comparable to the two other conventional systems.
背景/目的:临床研究表明,正畸托槽的平均脱粘率在6%至8%之间,其中下颌第二前磨牙的脱粘率尤为突出。预涂无闪光粘合剂的陶瓷托槽,据其制造商称,可实现较低的脱粘率,同时确保操作简化。本研究的目的是测量使用预涂无闪光粘合剂系统通过直接法粘结的陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度,并将其与旧一代预涂托槽以及操作者在第二下颌前磨牙颊面粘结托槽的剪切粘结强度进行比较。
45颗因正畸原因拔除的下颌第二前磨牙随机分为3组,每组15颗牙。第一组托槽用APC™无闪光系统(3M Unitek)预涂;第二组用APC Plus系统(3M Unitek)预涂;第三组托槽用Transbond XT复合树脂(3M Unitek)手动粘结。三组的釉质表面处理方式相同:先用36%正磷酸酸蚀,然后涂抹Transbond XT底漆粘合剂(3M Unitek)。每个样本在剪切模式下使用LRX万能材料试验机(英国法勒姆的劳埃德仪器有限公司)以1.0mm/min的十字头速度施加剪切粘结强度力。记录每颗牙齿托槽的粘结强度值,单位为兆帕(MPa)。然后使用单因素方差分析检验比较平均值。
尽管APC无闪光组的平均剪切粘结强度值低于其他两组,但这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.276)。
在本体外研究的实验条件下,用APC无闪光系统预涂的托槽的剪切粘结强度与其他两种传统系统相当。