Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
CHU Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Dec;100(4):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Hand hygiene is a fundamental component of infection prevention, but few studies have examined whether hand-drying method affects the risk of dissemination of potential pathogens.
To perform a multi-centre, internal-crossover study comparing bacterial contamination levels in washrooms with hand-drying by either paper towels (PT) or jet air dryer (JAD; Dyson).
A total of 120 sampling sessions occurred over 12 weeks in each of three hospitals (UK, France, Italy). Bacteria were cultured from air, multiple surfaces, and dust. Washroom footfall (patients/visitors/staff) was monitored externally.
Footfall was nine times higher in UK washrooms. Bacterial contamination was lower in PT versus JAD washrooms; contamination was similar in France and the UK, but markedly lower in Italian washrooms. Total bacterial recovery was significantly greater from JAD versus PT dispenser surfaces at all sites (median: 100-300 vs 0-10 cfu; all P < 0.0001). In the UK and France, significantly more bacteria were recovered from JAD washroom floors (median: 24 vs 191 cfu, P < 0.00001). UK meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus recovery was three times more frequent and six-fold higher for JAD vs PT surfaces (both P < 0.0001). UK meticillin-resistant S. aureus recovery was three times more frequent (21 vs 7 cfu) from JAD versus PT surfaces or floors. Significantly more enterococci and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria were recovered from UK JAD versus PT washroom floors (P < 0.0001). In France, ESBL-producing bacteria were recovered from dust twice as often during JAD versus PT use.
Multiple examples of significant differences in surface bacterial contamination, including by faecal and antibiotic-resistant bacteria, were observed, with higher levels in JAD versus PT washrooms. Hand-drying method affects the risk of (airborne) dissemination of bacteria in real-world settings.
手部卫生是感染预防的基本组成部分,但很少有研究探讨手干燥方法是否会影响潜在病原体传播的风险。
进行一项多中心、内部交叉研究,比较在英国、法国和意大利的三家医院中,使用纸巾(PT)或喷气式空气干燥器(JAD;戴森)进行手干燥时的细菌污染水平。
在每个医院进行了 12 周共 120 次采样,监测了空气、多个表面和灰尘中的细菌。外部监测了洗手间的人流量(患者/访客/工作人员)。
英国洗手间的人流量高 9 倍。与 JAD 相比,PT 洗手间的细菌污染水平较低;法国和英国的污染情况相似,但意大利洗手间的污染明显较低。在所有地点,JAD 与 PT 分配器表面的总细菌回收率明显更高(中位数:100-300 比 0-10cfu;均 P<0.0001)。在英国和法国,JAD 洗手间地板上回收的细菌明显更多(中位数:24 比 191cfu,P<0.00001)。英国耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的回收频率是 JAD 比 PT 表面高三倍(均 P<0.0001)。JAD 比 PT 表面或地板上回收的英国耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的回收量高六倍(21 比 7cfu)。JAD 与 PT 洗手间地板上的肠球菌和产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的细菌回收量明显更多(均 P<0.0001)。在法国,使用 JAD 时,从灰尘中回收 ESBL 产生菌的频率是使用 PT 时的两倍。
在实际环境中,观察到包括粪便和抗生素耐药菌在内的表面细菌污染水平存在多个显著差异,JAD 比 PT 洗手间的污染水平更高。手干燥方法会影响细菌(空气传播)在现实环境中的传播风险。