Suppr超能文献

手部干燥在预防微生物传播中的作用:三种手部干燥方法在去除和分布微生物方面的效果比较。

The contribution of hand drying in prevention of transmission of microorganisms: Comparison of the efficacy of three hand drying methods in the removal and distribution of microorganisms.

作者信息

Pitt Sarah J, Crockett Samantha L, Andreou Gregory M

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

J Infect Prev. 2018 Nov;19(6):310-317. doi: 10.1177/1757177418789485. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hand hygiene is a key tool in infection control. While methods of hand washing have been widely researched, there have been fewer studies investigating the effectiveness of available ways to dry hands in public areas.

AIMS

This study compared the efficacy of using paper towels (PT), warm air dryers (WAD) and jet air dryers (JAD) after hand washing in terms of microbiological effectiveness and potential for dispersal of pathogens.

METHODS

Microbial flora on palms and fingertips of 30 subjects were sampled on nutrient agar plates before washing hands and after drying with PTs, WADs and JADs. Total colony forming units (cfus) were recorded. Walls in the vicinity of a PT dispenser, WAD and JAD in female and male washrooms were sampled for the presence of viable microorganisms.

RESULTS

Mean cfu significantly reduced after drying with PTs (palms t= 2.67, p <0.05; fingertips t=4.44, p<0.01) significantly increased after using WADs (palms t=3.11, p<0.01; fingertips t=2.06, p<0.05), but there was no difference with JAD (palms t= 1.85, p>0.05; fingertips t=0.97, p>0.05). Some dispersal of organisms was detected on the washroom walls, with the least distribution around PT dispensers and unusual opportunistic pathogens isolated from the JAD units.

DISCUSSION

PTs are more effective at drying hands than WADs and JADs, they are more likely to be used appropriately and lead to minimal dispersal of microorganisms from wet hands.

摘要

背景

手部卫生是感染控制的关键手段。虽然洗手方法已得到广泛研究,但针对公共场所现有手部干燥方法有效性的研究较少。

目的

本研究比较了洗手后使用纸巾(PT)、暖风干手器(WAD)和喷气式干手器(JAD)在微生物学有效性和病原体传播可能性方面的效果。

方法

在30名受试者洗手前以及用PT、WAD和JAD擦干后,在营养琼脂平板上采集其手掌和指尖的微生物菌群。记录总菌落形成单位(cfu)。对男女洗手间中PT分配器、WAD和JAD附近的墙壁进行采样,检测是否存在活微生物。

结果

用PT擦干后平均cfu显著降低(手掌t = 2.67,p <0.05;指尖t = 4.44,p <0.01),使用WAD后显著增加(手掌t = 第3.11,p <0.01;指尖t = 2.06,p <0.05),但JAD无差异(手掌t = 1.85,p> 0.05;指尖t = 0.97,p> 0.05)。在洗手间墙壁上检测到一些微生物传播,PT分配器周围分布最少,且从JAD装置中分离出不寻常的机会性病原体。

讨论

PT在擦干手部方面比WAD和JAD更有效,它们更可能被正确使用,且能使湿手上的微生物传播降至最低。

相似文献

5
Aerosols and Bacteria From Hand Washing and Drying in Indoor Air.室内空气洗手和干燥过程中的气溶胶和细菌。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 7;10:804825. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.804825. eCollection 2022.
10

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验