• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在教授堕胎及其他道德和精神层面敏感话题时促进讨论。

Fostering Discussion When Teaching Abortion and Other Morally and Spiritually Charged Topics.

作者信息

King Louise P, Penzias Alan

机构信息

an assistant professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology at Harvard Medical School, the director of reproductive biology at Harvard Medical School Center for Bioethics, and a surgeon within the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.

a reproductive endocrinologist at Boston IVF; an associate professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology at Harvard Medical School; and the director of the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Fellowship Program at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School in Boston.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):E637-642. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.637.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2018.637
PMID:30007024
Abstract

Best practices for teaching morally and spiritually charged topics, such as abortion, to those early in their medical training are elusive at best, especially in our current political climate. Here we advocate that our duty as educators requires that we explore these topics in a supportive environment. In particular, we must model respectful discourse for our learners in these difficult areas.

摘要

对于那些处于医学培训早期阶段的人,教授诸如堕胎等充满道德和精神争议的主题,即便在最好的情况下,最佳实践方法也难以捉摸,尤其是在我们当前的政治环境中。在此,我们主张,作为教育工作者,我们的职责要求我们在一个支持性的环境中探讨这些主题。特别是,我们必须在这些困难领域为我们的学习者树立尊重性话语的典范。

相似文献

1
Fostering Discussion When Teaching Abortion and Other Morally and Spiritually Charged Topics.在教授堕胎及其他道德和精神层面敏感话题时促进讨论。
AMA J Ethics. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):E637-642. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.637.
2
Medical students for choice: creating tomorrow's abortion providers.
Contraception. 2011 May;83(5):391-3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.019. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
3
Student perceptions of reproductive health education in US medical schools: a qualitative analysis of students taking family planning electives.美国医学院校学生对生殖健康教育的认知:对选修计划生育课程的学生进行的定性分析
Med Educ Online. 2015 Nov 11;20:28973. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28973. eCollection 2015.
4
Impact of partial participation in integrated family planning training on medical knowledge, patient communication and professionalism.部分参与综合计划生育培训对医学知识、医患沟通及职业素养的影响
Contraception. 2014 Apr;89(4):278-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
5
Responses to abortion training.对堕胎培训的反应。
Fam Med. 2008 May;40(5):310-1.
6
Medical Students for Choice: origins, current orientations, and potential impact.支持选择的医学生:起源、当前取向及潜在影响
Teach Learn Med. 2003 Winter;15(1):52-8. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1501_10.
7
Perceptions of family planning and abortion education at a faith-based medical school.基于信仰的医学院校的计划生育和堕胎教育认知。
Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
8
The Effects of Abortion Training on Family Medicine Residents' Clinical Experience.堕胎培训对家庭医学住院医师临床经验的影响。
Fam Med. 2017 Jan;49(1):22-27.
9
How med students put abortion back in the classroom.医学生如何将堕胎议题带回课堂。
Time. 2001 May 7;157(18):59-60.
10
Abortion training in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology residency programs.加拿大妇产科住院医师培训项目中的堕胎培训
Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):478-482. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
"It's important to foster open discussion about the topic": development, implementation, and evaluation of an ethics of abortion independent learning module for second year medical students.“促进关于这个话题的公开讨论很重要”:为二年级医学生开发、实施和评估一个独立的堕胎伦理学习模块。
Reprod Health. 2023 Sep 25;20(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01686-w.