Adams Rachel Sayko, Thomas Cindy Parks, Ritter Grant A, Lee Sue, Saadoun Mayada, Williams Thomas V, Larson Mary Jo
Institute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA.
Schneider Institute for Health Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA.
Mil Med. 2019 Jan 1;184(1-2):e101-e109. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy162.
Little is known about long-term prescription opioid utilization in the Military Health System. The objectives of this study were to examine predictors of any prescription opioid receipt, and predictors of long-term opioid utilization among active duty soldiers in the year following deployment.
The analytic sample consisted of Army active duty soldiers returning from deployment to Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation New Dawn in fiscal years 2008-2014 (N = 540,738). The Heckman probit procedure was used to jointly examine predictors of any opioid prescription receipt and long-term opioid utilization (i.e., an episode of 90 days or longer where days-supply covered at least two-thirds of days) in the postdeployment year. Predictors were based on diagnoses and characteristics of opioid prescriptions.
More than one-third of soldiers (34.8%, n = 188,211) had opioid receipt, and among those soldiers, 3.3% had long-term opioid utilization (or 1.1% of the cohort, n = 6,188). The largest magnitude predictors of long-term opioid utilization were receiving a long-acting opioid within the first 30 days of the episode, diagnoses of chronic pain (no specified source), back/neck pain, or peripheral/central nervous system pain, and severe pain score in vital records.
Soldiers returning from deployment were more likely to receive an opioid prescription than the overall active duty population, and 1.1% initiated a long-term opioid episode. We report a declining rate of opioid receipt and long-term opioid utilization among Army members from fiscal years 2008-2014. This study demonstrates that the most important predictors of opioid receipt were not demographic factors, but generally clinical indicators of acute pain or physical trauma.
对于军事卫生系统中长期处方阿片类药物的使用情况,我们了解甚少。本研究的目的是调查现役军人在部署后一年内接受任何处方阿片类药物的预测因素,以及长期使用阿片类药物的预测因素。
分析样本包括2008 - 2014财年从持久自由行动、伊拉克自由行动或新黎明行动部署归来的陆军现役军人(N = 540,738)。使用赫克曼概率单位程序联合检查部署后一年内接受任何阿片类药物处方的预测因素以及长期使用阿片类药物的情况(即持续90天或更长时间且日供应量至少覆盖三分之二天数的时间段)。预测因素基于阿片类药物处方的诊断和特征。
超过三分之一的军人(34.8%,n = 188,211)接受了阿片类药物,在这些军人中,3.3%长期使用阿片类药物(占队列的1.1%,n = 6,188)。长期使用阿片类药物的最大预测因素是在事件的前30天内接受长效阿片类药物、慢性疼痛(无特定来源)、背部/颈部疼痛或外周/中枢神经系统疼痛的诊断以及重要记录中的严重疼痛评分。
从部署归来的军人比现役军人总体更有可能接受阿片类药物处方,且1.1%开始了长期阿片类药物使用。我们报告了2008 - 2014财年陆军成员中阿片类药物接受率和长期阿片类药物使用率的下降情况。本研究表明,接受阿片类药物的最重要预测因素不是人口统计学因素,而是急性疼痛或身体创伤的一般临床指标。