Barnett Michael L, Olenski Andrew R, Jena Anupam B
From the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (M.L.B.), the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School (A.R.O., A.B.J.), the Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital (M.L.B.), and the Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (A.B.J.), Boston, and the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (A.B.J.) - all in Massachusetts.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):663-673. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1610524.
Increasing overuse of opioids in the United States may be driven in part by physician prescribing. However, the extent to which individual physicians vary in opioid prescribing and the implications of that variation for long-term opioid use and adverse outcomes in patients are unknown.
We performed a retrospective analysis involving Medicare beneficiaries who had an index emergency department visit in the period from 2008 through 2011 and had not received prescriptions for opioids within 6 months before that visit. After identifying the emergency physicians within a hospital who cared for the patients, we categorized the physicians as being high-intensity or low-intensity opioid prescribers according to relative quartiles of prescribing rates within the same hospital. We compared rates of long-term opioid use, defined as 6 months of days supplied, in the 12 months after a visit to the emergency department among patients treated by high-intensity or low-intensity prescribers, with adjustment for patient characteristics.
Our sample consisted of 215,678 patients who received treatment from low-intensity prescribers and 161,951 patients who received treatment from high-intensity prescribers. Patient characteristics, including diagnoses in the emergency department, were similar in the two treatment groups. Within individual hospitals, rates of opioid prescribing varied widely between low-intensity and high-intensity prescribers (7.3% vs. 24.1%). Long-term opioid use was significantly higher among patients treated by high-intensity prescribers than among patients treated by low-intensity prescribers (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 1.37; P<0.001); these findings were consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses.
Wide variation in rates of opioid prescribing existed among physicians practicing within the same emergency department, and rates of long-term opioid use were increased among patients who had not previously received opioids and received treatment from high-intensity opioid prescribers. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).
美国阿片类药物过度使用情况日益增加,部分原因可能是医生的处方行为。然而,个体医生在阿片类药物处方方面的差异程度以及这种差异对患者长期阿片类药物使用和不良后果的影响尚不清楚。
我们进行了一项回顾性分析,纳入了2008年至2011年期间有过一次急诊就诊且在此次就诊前6个月内未接受过阿片类药物处方的医疗保险受益人。在确定医院中为患者提供治疗的急诊医生后,我们根据同一医院内处方率的相对四分位数将医生分为高强度或低强度阿片类药物处方者。我们比较了高强度或低强度处方者治疗的患者在急诊就诊后12个月内长期使用阿片类药物的比率(定义为供应天数达6个月),并对患者特征进行了调整。
我们的样本包括215,678名接受低强度处方者治疗的患者和161,951名接受高强度处方者治疗的患者。两个治疗组的患者特征,包括急诊诊断,相似。在各个医院中,低强度和高强度处方者之间的阿片类药物处方率差异很大(7.3%对24.1%)。高强度处方者治疗的患者长期使用阿片类药物的比例显著高于低强度处方者治疗的患者(调整后的优势比为1.30;95%置信区间为1.23至1.37;P<0.001);这些发现在多项敏感性分析中一致。
在同一急诊科执业的医生之间,阿片类药物处方率存在很大差异,且在之前未使用过阿片类药物并接受高强度阿片类药物处方者治疗的患者中,长期使用阿片类药物的比例有所增加。(由美国国立卫生研究院资助。)