• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HVAD:ENDURANCE 补充试验。

HVAD: The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial.

机构信息

Departments of Surgery and Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Departments of Surgery and Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;6(9):792-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jchf.2018.05.012
PMID:30007559
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of blood pressure management on stroke rates in patients receiving the HeartWare HVAD System.

BACKGROUND

The ENDURANCE trial demonstrated noninferiority of the HeartWare HVAD System versus control (HeartMate II) in patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for heart transplantation. However, stroke was more common in HVAD subjects. Post hoc analyses demonstrated increased mean arterial blood pressure as a significant independent risk factor for stroke.

METHODS

The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial was a prospective, multicenter evaluation of 465 patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for transplantation, randomized 2:1 to HVAD (n = 308) or control (n = 157). The primary endpoint was the 12-month incidence of transient ischemic attack or stroke with residual deficit 24 weeks post-event. Secondary endpoints included the composite of freedom from death, disabling stroke, and need for device replacement or urgent transplantation, as well as comparisons of stroke or transient ischemic attack rates in HVAD cohorts in ENDURANCE Supplemental and ENDURANCE.

RESULTS

The enhanced blood pressure protocol significantly reduced mean arterial blood pressure. The primary endpoint was not achieved (14.7% with HVAD vs. 12.1% with control, noninferiority [margin 6%] p = 0.14). However, the secondary composite endpoint demonstrated superiority of HVAD (76.1%) versus control (66.9%) (p = 0.04). The incidence of stroke in HVAD subjects was reduced 24.2% in ENDURANCE Supplemental compared with ENDURANCE (p = 0.10), and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident was reduced by 50.5% (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial failed to demonstrate noninferiority of HVAD versus control regarding the pre-specified primary endpoint. However, the trial confirmed that BP management is associated with reduced stroke rates in HVAD subjects. HVAD subjects, relative to control subjects, more commonly achieved the composite endpoint (freedom from death, disabling stroke, and device replacement or urgent transplantation). (A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the HeartWare™ Ventricular Assist System [ENDURANCE SUPPLEMENTAL TRIAL] [DT2]; NCT01966458).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在前瞻性评估血压管理对接受 HeartWare HVAD 系统治疗的患者中风发生率的影响。

背景

ENDURANCE 试验表明,在不适合心脏移植的晚期心力衰竭患者中,HeartWare HVAD 系统与对照组(HeartMate II)相比非劣效。然而,HVAD 组的中风更为常见。事后分析表明,平均动脉压升高是中风的一个显著独立危险因素。

方法

ENDURANCE 补充试验是一项前瞻性、多中心评估,纳入 465 名不适合移植的晚期心力衰竭患者,随机分为 2:1 接受 HVAD(n=308)或对照组(n=157)治疗。主要终点是事件后 24 周时短暂性脑缺血发作或中风伴残留缺陷的 12 个月发生率。次要终点包括死亡率、致残性中风和设备更换或紧急移植的无事件率,以及 ENDURANCE 补充试验和 ENDURANCE 中 HVAD 队列中风或短暂性脑缺血发作率的比较。

结果

强化血压方案显著降低了平均动脉压。主要终点未达到(HVAD 组为 14.7%,对照组为 12.1%,非劣效性[边界 6%]p=0.14)。然而,次要复合终点显示 HVAD 优于对照组(HVAD 组为 76.1%,对照组为 66.9%)(p=0.04)。与 ENDURANCE 相比,HVAD 组在 ENDURANCE 补充试验中的中风发生率降低了 24.2%(p=0.10),出血性脑血管意外发生率降低了 50.5%(p=0.02)。

结论

ENDURANCE 补充试验未能证明 HVAD 与对照组在预先指定的主要终点上非劣效。然而,该试验证实血压管理与 HVAD 患者中风发生率降低相关。与对照组相比,HVAD 组更常见达到复合终点(免于死亡、致残性中风、设备更换或紧急移植)。

相似文献

1
HVAD: The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial.HVAD:ENDURANCE 补充试验。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;6(9):792-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
2
Do patients with the centrifugal flow HeartMate 3 or HeartWare left ventricular assist device have better outcomes compared to those with axial flow HeartMate II?与使用轴流HeartMate II的患者相比,使用离心流HeartMate 3或HeartWare左心室辅助装置的患者是否有更好的治疗效果?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec 1;29(6):844-851. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz202.
3
Understanding risk factors and predictors for stroke subtypes in the ENDURANCE trials.了解 ENDURANCE 试验中中风亚型的风险因素和预测因素。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jul;39(7):639-647. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.1330. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
4
An analysis of pump thrombus events in patients in the HeartWare ADVANCE bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial.对 HeartWare ADVANCE 桥接移植和持续准入方案试验中患者的泵血栓事件进行分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jan;33(1):23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
5
The HVAD Left Ventricular Assist Device: Risk Factors for Neurological Events and Risk Mitigation Strategies.HVAD 左心室辅助装置:神经事件的危险因素和风险缓解策略。
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Oct;3(10):818-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.05.011.
6
Cerebrovascular Events in Patients With Centrifugal-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis From the Intermacs Registry.离心血流左心室辅助装置患者的脑血管事件:来自 Intermacs 注册中心的倾向评分匹配分析。
Circulation. 2021 Sep 7;144(10):763-772. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055716D.
7
Cerebrovascular Events in Patients With Centrifugal-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis From the Intermacs Registry.离心血流左心室辅助装置患者的脑血管事件:来自 Intermacs 注册中心的倾向评分匹配分析。
Circulation. 2021 Sep 7;144(10):763-772. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055716. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
8
Stroke risk following implantation of current generation centrifugal flow left ventricular assist devices.当代离心式左心室辅助装置植入后的中风风险
J Card Surg. 2020 Feb;35(2):383-389. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14397. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
9
Intrapericardial Left Ventricular Assist Device for Advanced Heart Failure.经心室内左心室辅助装置治疗晚期心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):451-460. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602954.
10
Clinical differences between continuous flow ventricular assist devices: a comparison between HeartMate II and HeartWare HVAD.连续血流心室辅助装置的临床差异:HeartMate II与HeartWare HVAD的比较
J Card Surg. 2013 Sep;28(5):604-10. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12158. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning Prediction of Left Ventricular Assist Device Thrombosis from Acoustic Harmonic Power.基于声学谐波功率的机器学习对左心室辅助装置血栓形成的预测
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 2;12(5):484. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050484.
2
Outcome Through the Years of Left-Ventricular Assist Devices Therapy for End-Stage Heart Failure: A Review.晚期心力衰竭患者多年来接受左心室辅助装置治疗的结局:一项综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 4;13(21):6622. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216622.
3
Heartware ventricular assist device versus HeartMate II versus HeartMate III in advanced heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
心力衰竭晚期患者使用Heartware心室辅助装置与HeartMate II及HeartMate III的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Aug 30;12:20503121241278226. doi: 10.1177/20503121241278226. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for advanced heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.左心室辅助装置作为晚期心力衰竭的终末期治疗的临床和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(38):1-237. doi: 10.3310/MLFA4009.
5
The Long-Term Survival of LVAD Patients-A TriNetX Database Analysis.左心室辅助装置患者的长期生存——一项TriNetX数据库分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 13;13(14):4096. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144096.
6
Early stroke after left ventricular assist device implantation: role of right heart failure.左心室辅助装置植入术后早期卒中:右心衰竭的作用
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Dec 30;15(12):6730-6740. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1194. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
7
Stroke and Mechanical Circulatory Support in Adults.成人中风与机械循环支持。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Dec;25(12):1665-1675. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01985-5. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
8
Five-Year Outcome After Continuous Flow LVAD With Full-Magnetic (HeartMate 3) Versus Hybrid Levitation System (HeartWare): A Propensity-Score Matched Study From an All-Comers Multicentre Registry.连续血流左心室辅助装置(HeartMate 3)全磁悬浮与混合磁悬浮系统(HeartWare)五年后结局:一项来自多中心全人群注册研究的倾向性评分匹配研究。
Transpl Int. 2023 Sep 4;36:11675. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11675. eCollection 2023.
9
Futuristic perspectives: novel MCS devices.未来展望:新型机械循环支持设备
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;39(Suppl 1):190-197. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01519-2. Epub 2023 May 8.
10
Implantable mechanical circulatory support in The Netherlands.荷兰的植入式机械循环支持
Neth Heart J. 2023 May;31(5):175-176. doi: 10.1007/s12471-023-01782-3. Epub 2023 Apr 18.