Chiang Yuting P, Cox Daniel, Schroder Jacob N, Daneshmand Mani A, Blue Laura J, Patel Chetan B, DeVore Adam D, Bishawi Muath, Milano Carmelo A
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
J Card Surg. 2020 Feb;35(2):383-389. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14397. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
Stroke remains a significant complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. We performed a single-center retrospective study evaluating patients undergoing first-time HeartWare HVAD (Medtronic Inc) or HeartMate 3 (Abbott Inc) implantation from September 2009-February 2018.
Exclusion criteria were age <18 and preoperative ECMO. The primary endpoint was stroke-free survival. Stroke was defined as new neurological deficits persisting >24 hours with corresponding radiographic evidence. Risk factors evaluated included demographics, medical comorbidities, heart failure etiology, LVAD indication, INTERMACS profile, and device type. Univariate predictors (P < .15) and variables clinically suspected to raise stroke risk were entered in a multivariate hazard regression model, specified using backward selection of covariates and accounting for competing risks of transplant/LVAD exchange.
A total of 163 HVAD and 84 HM3 patients were analyzed. Median follow up (until death, censoring for transplant/LVAD removal, or end of follow up) was 1.2 years in HVAD patients and 1.4 years in HM3 patients. Stroke occurred in 24 HVAD patients (15 ischemic, 9 hemorrhagic) and 6 HM3 patients (4 ischemic, 2 hemorrhagic). One-year stroke-free survival was 76.8% for HVAD and 84.3% for HM3. Thirty-day mortality following stroke was 41.7% for HVAD and 66.7% for HM3; 54.2% of HVAD strokes were disabling compared to 83.3% of HM3 strokes. Age, LVAD indication, and device type were associated (P < .15) with stroke on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the HVAD was associated with significantly higher stroke risk (hazard ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-6.44; P = .045).
Different LVAD models appear to be associated with significantly different stroke risks.
中风仍然是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗的一个重大并发症。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,评估2009年9月至2018年2月期间首次植入HeartWare HVAD(美敦力公司)或HeartMate 3(雅培公司)的患者。
排除标准为年龄<18岁和术前使用体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)。主要终点是无中风生存。中风定义为持续超过24小时的新发神经功能缺损并有相应的影像学证据。评估的风险因素包括人口统计学、合并症、心力衰竭病因、LVAD适应证、INTERMACS分级和装置类型。单因素预测因素(P<0.15)和临床上怀疑会增加中风风险的变量被纳入多因素风险回归模型,使用协变量的向后选择进行设定,并考虑移植/LVAD更换的竞争风险。
共分析了163例HVAD患者和84例HM3患者。HVAD患者的中位随访时间(直至死亡、因移植/LVAD移除进行截尾或随访结束)为1.2年,HM3患者为1.4年。24例HVAD患者发生中风(15例缺血性,9例出血性),6例HM3患者发生中风(4例缺血性,2例出血性)。HVAD患者的1年无中风生存率为76.8%,HM3患者为84.3%。中风后30天死亡率HVAD患者为41.7%,HM3患者为66.7%;54.2%的HVAD中风导致残疾,而HM3中风导致残疾的比例为83.3%。单因素分析中,年龄、LVAD适应证和装置类型与中风相关(P<0.15)。多因素分析中,HVAD与显著更高的中风风险相关(风险比,2.57;95%置信区间,1.02 - 6.44;P = 0.045)。
不同的LVAD型号似乎与显著不同的中风风险相关。