Smith Daniel T, Tiffin Paul A
General Medical Council, London, UK.
Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 13;8(7):e021918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021918.
Currently relative performance at medical school (educational performance measure (EPM) decile), additional educational achievements and the score on a situational judgement test (SJT) are used to rank applicants to the UK Foundation Years postgraduate medical training programme. We sought to evaluate whether these three measures were predictive of subsequent successful completion of the programme, and thus were valid selection criteria.
Data were obtained from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) on 14 131 UK applicants to the foundation programme starting in 2013 and 2014. These data included training outcomes in the form of Annual Reviews of Competency Progression (ARCPs), which indicated whether the programme was successfully completed. The relationship between applicants' performance on the three selection measures to the odds of successful programme completion were modelled.
On univariable analyses, all three measures were associated with the odds of successful completion of the programme. Converting the SJT score to deciles to compare the effect sizes suggested that one decile increase in the EPM increased the odds of completing the programme by approximately 15%, whereas the equivalent value was 8% for the SJT scores. On multivariable analyses (with all three measures included in the model), these effects were only independently and statistically significant for EPM decile (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.18, p<0.001) and SJT z-score decile (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09, p=0.02).
The EPM decile and SJT scores may be effective selection measures for the foundation programme. However, educational achievements does not add value to the other two measures when predicting programme completion. Thus, its usefulness in this context is less clear. Moreover, our findings suggest that the weighting for the EPM decile score, relative to SJT performance, should be increased.
目前,医学院的相对成绩(教育表现指标(EPM)十分位数)、额外的教育成就以及情景判断测试(SJT)的分数被用于对申请英国基础阶段研究生医学培训项目的申请人进行排名。我们试图评估这三项指标是否能预测该项目随后的成功完成情况,从而确定它们是否为有效的选拔标准。
从英国医学教育数据库(UKMED)获取了2013年和2014年开始申请基础项目的14131名英国申请人的数据。这些数据包括以能力进展年度评估(ARCPs)形式呈现的培训结果,该结果表明项目是否成功完成。对申请人在这三项选拔指标上的表现与项目成功完成几率之间的关系进行了建模。
在单变量分析中,所有三项指标都与项目成功完成几率相关。将SJT分数转换为十分位数以比较效应大小,结果表明EPM十分位数每增加一个十分位,完成项目的几率增加约15%,而SJT分数的等效值为8%。在多变量分析中(模型中纳入了所有三项指标),这些效应仅对EPM十分位数(OR 1.14,95%CI 1.10至1.18,p<0.001)和SJT z分数十分位数(OR 1.05,95%CI 1.01至1.09,p = 0.02)具有独立且统计学意义。
EPM十分位数和SJT分数可能是基础项目有效的选拔指标。然而,在预测项目完成情况时,教育成就并不能为其他两项指标增加价值。因此,其在这种情况下的有用性不太明确。此外,我们的研究结果表明,相对于SJT表现,应增加EPM十分位数分数的权重。