Suppr超能文献

tau 并不稳定轴突微管,而是使它们具有长的不稳定的结构域。

Tau Does Not Stabilize Axonal Microtubules but Rather Enables Them to Have Long Labile Domains.

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, China.

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, China.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2018 Jul 9;28(13):2181-2189.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.045. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

Abstract

It is widely believed that tau stabilizes microtubules in the axon [1-3] and, hence, that disease-induced loss of tau from axonal microtubules leads to their destabilization [3-5]. An individual microtubule in the axon has a stable domain and a labile domain [6-8]. We found that tau is more abundant on the labile domain, which is inconsistent with tau's proposed role as a microtubule stabilizer. When tau is experimentally depleted from cultured rat neurons, the labile microtubule mass of the axon drops considerably, the remaining labile microtubule mass becomes less labile, and the stable microtubule mass increases. MAP6 (also called stable tubule-only polypeptide), which is normally enriched on the stable domain [9], acquires a broader distribution across the microtubule when tau is depleted, providing a potential explanation for the increase in stable microtubule mass. When MAP6 is depleted, the labile microtubule mass becomes even more labile, indicating that, unlike tau, MAP6 is a genuine stabilizer of axonal microtubules. We conclude that tau is not a stabilizer of axonal microtubules but is enriched on the labile domain of the microtubule to promote its assembly while limiting the binding to it of genuine stabilizers, such as MAP6. This enables the labile domain to achieve great lengths without being stabilized. These conclusions are contrary to tau dogma.

摘要

人们普遍认为,tau 稳定了轴突中的微管[1-3],因此,疾病导致 tau 从轴突微管中丢失会导致微管不稳定[3-5]。轴突中的单个微管具有稳定结构域和不稳定结构域[6-8]。我们发现 tau 在不稳定结构域的含量更高,这与 tau 作为微管稳定剂的预期作用不一致。当 tau 被实验性地从培养的大鼠神经元中耗尽时,轴突中的不稳定微管质量会显著下降,剩余的不稳定微管质量变得不那么不稳定,稳定微管质量增加。MAP6(也称为稳定微管唯一多肽)[9]通常富集在稳定结构域上,当 tau 耗尽时,它在微管上的分布更广泛,为稳定微管质量的增加提供了潜在的解释。当 MAP6 被耗尽时,不稳定微管质量变得更加不稳定,这表明,与 tau 不同,MAP6 是轴突微管的真正稳定剂。我们的结论是,tau 不是轴突微管的稳定剂,而是在微管的不稳定结构域中富集,以促进其组装,同时限制真正的稳定剂,如 MAP6,与它的结合。这使得不稳定结构域能够在不被稳定的情况下达到很大的长度。这些结论与 tau 的教条相反。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验