School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Meat Sci. 2018 Oct;144:30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
Consumer evaluation has been used extensively over the past decades to evaluate acceptability and quality of food products. New methods have been developed to overcome some biases of traditional techniques. Testing with meat is challenging due to the high variability of the meat samples. This review outlines (a) the traditional consumer-based techniques for assessing food, and available methods to link consumer responses to sensory properties (b) qualitative measurements, (c) past and current methods for evaluating meat sensory characteristics and the development of the Meat Standard Australia (MSA) protocol, and (d) psychological and physiological factors affecting consumers. Conclusions from this review are: (1) Traditional consumer testing provides important information regarding acceptability but may miss important unconscious responses of consumers (2) Qualitative methods can obtain more holistic responses from consumers, (3) The Meat Standard Australia (MSA) protocol delivers consistent scores of meat's juiciness/tenderness/flavour and overall acceptability from consumers, and (4) Physiological responses may help to understand the unbiased emotions of consumers.
在过去几十年中,消费者评估被广泛用于评估食品的可理解性和质量。已经开发出了新的方法来克服传统技术的一些偏见。由于肉样的高度可变性,用肉进行测试具有挑战性。本综述概述了:(a)用于评估食品的传统基于消费者的技术,以及将消费者反应与感官特性(b)定性测量,(c)过去和当前用于评估肉的感官特性和肉类标准澳大利亚(MSA)协议的开发的方法,以及(d)影响消费者的心理和生理因素。从本综述中得出的结论是:(1)传统的消费者测试提供了关于可接受性的重要信息,但可能会错过消费者的重要无意识反应;(2)定性方法可以使消费者获得更全面的反应;(3)肉类标准澳大利亚(MSA)协议可以为消费者提供肉的多汁性/嫩度/风味和总体可接受性的一致评分;(4)生理反应可以帮助理解消费者的无偏见情绪。