Sanders Jet G, Jenkins Rob
Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Jun 27;3:24. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0118-3. eCollection 2018 Dec.
Hyper-realistic masks present a new challenge to security and crime prevention. We have recently shown that people's ability to differentiate these masks from real faces is extremely limited. Here we consider individual differences as a means to improve mask detection. Participants categorized single images as masks or real faces in a computer-based task. Experiment 1 revealed poor accuracy (40%) and large individual differences (5-100%) for high-realism masks among low-realism masks and real faces. Individual differences in mask categorization accuracy remained large when the Low-realism condition was eliminated (Experiment 2). Accuracy for mask images was not correlated with accuracy for real face images or with prior knowledge of hyper-realistic face masks. Image analysis revealed that mask and face stimuli were most strongly differentiated in the region below the eyes. Moreover, high-performing participants tracked the differential information in this area, but low-performing participants did not. Like other face tasks (e.g. identification), hyper-realistic mask detection gives rise to large individual differences in performance. Unlike many other face tasks, performance may be localized to a specific image cue.
超逼真面具给安全和犯罪预防带来了新挑战。我们最近发现,人们区分这些面具和真实面孔的能力极其有限。在此,我们将个体差异视为提高面具检测能力的一种手段。参与者在一项基于计算机的任务中,将单张图像分类为面具或真实面孔。实验1显示,在低逼真度面具和真实面孔中,对于高逼真度面具的分类准确率很低(40%),且个体差异很大(5%-100%)。当消除低逼真度条件时,面具分类准确率的个体差异仍然很大(实验2)。面具图像的准确率与真实面孔图像的准确率或与超逼真面具的先验知识均无关联。图像分析显示,面具和面部刺激在眼睛下方区域的差异最为明显。此外,表现出色的参与者追踪了该区域的差异信息,而表现不佳的参与者则没有。与其他面部任务(如识别)一样,超逼真面具检测在表现上也存在很大的个体差异。与许多其他面部任务不同的是,表现可能局限于特定的图像线索。