1 Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
2 West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Child Maltreat. 2018 Nov;23(4):319-333. doi: 10.1177/1077559518781068. Epub 2018 Jul 15.
The Partnerships for Families project is a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Alternatives for Families: A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (AF-CBT), an evidence-based treatment (EBT) for families who are at risk of or have histories of child physical abuse. Across 10 agencies whose programs were supported by referrals from the mental health or child welfare system, individual providers were randomized to receive AF-CBT training ( n = 90) in a 6-month learning community or treatment as usual (TAU; n = 92) which provided trainings per agency routine. We recruited families served by providers in the AF-CBT ( n = 122) and TAU ( n = 73) conditions and collected multiple outcomes at up to four time points (0, 6, 12, and 18 months). Using univariate tests and growth curve models, the analyses revealed that AF-CBT (vs. TAU) showed improvements in both service systems (e.g., abuse risk, family dysfunction) or one service system (e.g., threats of force, child to parent minor assault), with some outcomes showing no improvement (e.g., parental anger). These findings are discussed in relation to AF-CBT, service system, provider, and family characteristics, and training/dissemination methods that affect the delivery of an EBT for this population in community settings.
家庭伙伴关系项目是一项随机临床试验,旨在评估替代家庭方案:认知行为疗法(AF-CBT)的有效性,该方案是针对有儿童身体虐待风险或有虐待史的家庭的循证治疗(EBT)。在 10 家机构中,其项目得到了心理健康或儿童福利系统的转介支持,个体提供者被随机分配接受为期 6 个月的学习社区中的 AF-CBT 培训(n=90)或接受常规培训的治疗(n=92)。我们招募了在 AF-CBT(n=122)和 TAU(n=73)条件下接受提供者服务的家庭,并在最多四个时间点(0、6、12 和 18 个月)收集了多个结果。使用单变量检验和增长曲线模型,分析结果表明,AF-CBT(与 TAU 相比)在服务系统(例如,虐待风险、家庭功能障碍)或一个服务系统(例如,武力威胁、儿童对父母的轻微攻击)方面均有所改善,而一些结果则没有改善(例如,父母的愤怒)。这些发现与 AF-CBT、服务系统、提供者和家庭特征以及培训/传播方法有关,这些方法影响着在社区环境中为这一人群提供 EBT 的效果。