Li Qinghua, Sun Rongqing, Liu Shuyuan, Lyu Hongdi, Wang Haiwei, Hu Qing, Wang Nannan, Yan Jin, Wang Jing, Li Xinli
Department of Intensive Care Unit, the 159th Hospital of PLA, Zhumadian 463008, Henan, China (Li QH, Lyu HD, Wang HW, Hu Q, Wang NN, Yan J, Wang J, Li XH); Department of Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China (Sun RQ); Department of Intensive Care Unit, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China (Liu SY). Corresponding author: Sun Rongqing, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jun;30(6):599-602. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.019.
To investigate the effects of heat acclimatization training on the inflammatory reaction and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in patients with exertional heat stroke (EHS).
600 officers and soldiers from a special team who participated in 5 km armed wild training from June to July 2017 were selected as the research object, while 30 healthy officers and men who did not participate in armed wild training during the same period were selected as normal controls. The officers and soldiers who participated in 5 km armed wild training (ambient temperature > 35 centigrade, humidity > 65%, 2-3 times a week for 3 weeks) were divided into heat acclimatization group and non-acclimatization group, with 300 in each group. The heat acclimatization group first took part in the heat acclimatization training of wild or long distance running (the initial temperature was 30 centigrade, gradually transferred to the hot time of 37 centigrade), 2 hours each time, twice a day, and 5 days a week, for a total of 2 weeks. Venous blood was taken before and after heat acclimatization training, before armed wild training, and after the last training or EHS onset, and the contents of serum interleukin (IL-1β, IL-10), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and γ-interferon (IFN-γ) were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The occurrence of EHS and MODS in EHS patients were recorded.
There was no significant difference in serum inflammatory factors between the officers and soldiers who participated in the training and the healthy control group before heat training or cross-country training. Compared with those before heat training, IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ were significantly increased in all participants of heat acclimatization training while IL-10 was significantly decreased. For those who experienced premonitory (6 cases) and mild (2 cases) heatstroke during training, they could return to normal without severe heatstroke or EHS within 10-30 minutes after being immediately put in a cool and ventilated place and given anti-heatstroke drugs and other interventions. Compared with those before wild training, the levels of inflammatory factors in the two groups of officers and soldiers also changed after wild training, but the increase or decrease of inflammatory indexes in the heat acclimatization group were significantly smaller than those in the non-acclimatization group [IL-1β (ng/L): 10.65±5.18 vs. 12.13±7.91, TNF-α (ng/L): 14.60±5.79 vs. 16.27±8.52, IFN-γ (ng/L): 13.66±5.43 vs. 15.33±8.71, IL-10 (ng/L): 8.22±2.68 vs. 7.13±2.63, all P < 0.05]. During armed wild training, a total of 27 cases of EHS occurred. The incidence of EHS in the heat acclimatization group was significantly lower than that in the non-acclimatization group [2.67% (8/300) vs. 6.33% (19/300), χ = 4.693, P = 0.030]. In patients with EHS, IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ after wild training in the heat acclimatization group were also significantly lower than those in the non-acclimatization group, and IL-10 was significantly higher [IL-1β (ng/L): 34.50±3.74 vs. 39.53±4.51, TNF-α (ng/L): 43.75±2.87 vs. 46.79±2.66, IFN-γ (ng/L): 40.25±1.75 vs. 46.58±1.92, IL-10 (ng/L): 7.50±2.45 vs. 5.42±1.80, all P < 0.01], and the incidence of MODS and organ involvement of EHS patients in the heat acclimation group were significantly lower than that in the non-acclimatization group [50.00% (4/8) vs. 89.47% (17/19), χ= 5.075, P = 0.024; 28.13% (9/32) vs. 47.79% (65/136), χ= 4.066, P = 0.044].
Heat acclimatization training before high strength training in high temperature and humidity environment can effectively reduce the degree of inflammation reaction of EHS, protect the physiological functions of EHS organs, and reduce the incidence of MODS.
探讨热适应训练对劳力性热射病(EHS)患者炎症反应及多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)的影响。
选取2017年6至7月参加5公里武装野外训练的某特战部队600名官兵作为研究对象,同期选取30名未参加武装野外训练的健康官兵作为正常对照组。将参加5公里武装野外训练(环境温度>35℃,湿度>65%,每周2 - 3次,共3周)的官兵分为热适应组和非适应组,每组300人。热适应组先参加野外或长跑热适应训练(初始温度30℃,逐渐过渡至37℃高温时段),每次2小时,每天2次,每周5天,共2周。分别于热适应训练前后、武装野外训练前及末次训练或EHS发病后采集静脉血,采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清白细胞介素(IL - 1β、IL - 10)、肿瘤坏死因子 - α(TNF - α)及γ - 干扰素(IFN - γ)含量。记录EHS患者中EHS及MODS的发生情况。
训练前或越野训练前,参加训练的官兵与健康对照组血清炎症因子水平差异无统计学意义。与热训练前相比,热适应训练的所有参与者IL - 1β、TNF - α、IFN - γ均显著升高,而IL - 10显著降低。训练中出现先兆中暑(6例)及轻症中暑(2例)者,立即置于阴凉通风处并给予抗中暑药物等干预后,10 - 30分钟内可恢复正常,未发生重症中暑或EHS。与野外训练前相比,两组官兵野外训练后炎症因子水平也发生变化,但热适应组炎症指标升高或降低幅度均显著小于非适应组[IL - 1β(ng/L):10.65±5.18 vs. 12.13±7.91,TNF - α(ng/L):14.60±5.79 vs. 16.27±8.52,IFN - γ(ng/L):13.66±5.43 vs. 15.33±8.71,IL - 10(ng/L):8.22±2.68 vs. 7.13±2.63,均P < 0.05]。武装野外训练期间,共发生27例EHS。热适应组EHS发病率显著低于非适应组[2.67%(8/300)vs. 6.33%(19/300),χ = 4.693,P = 0.030]。EHS患者中,热适应组野外训练后IL - 1β、TNF - α、IFN - γ也显著低于非适应组,而IL - 10显著高于非适应组[IL - 1β(ng/L):34.50±3.74 vs. 39.53±4.51,TNF - α(ng/L):43.75±2.87 vs. 46.79±2.66,IFN - γ(ng/L):40.25±1.75 vs. 46.58±1.92,IL - 10(ng/L):7.50±2.45 vs. 5.42±1.80,均P < 0.01],热适应组EHS患者MODS发生率及器官受累情况均显著低于非适应组[50.00%(4/8)vs. 89.47%(17/19),χ = 5.075,P = 0.024;28.13%(9/32)vs. 47.79%(65/136),χ = 4.066,P = 0.044]。
高温高湿环境下高强度训练前进行热适应训练可有效减轻EHS炎症反应程度,保护EHS器官生理功能,降低MODS发生率。