• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用证据权重方法评估生物制药的发育毒性。

Applying a weight of evidence approach to the evaluation of developmental toxicity of biopharmaceuticals.

机构信息

Janssen R&D LLC, Spring House, PA, United States.

Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;98:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.006
PMID:30009863
Abstract

Toxicity studies in pregnant animals are not always necessary for assessing the human risk of developmental toxicity of biopharmaceuticals. The growing experience and information on target biology and molecule-specific pharmacokinetics present a powerful approach to accurately anticipate effects of target engagement by biopharmaceuticals using a weight of evidence approach. The weight of evidence assessment should include all available data including target biology, pharmacokinetics, class effects, genetically modified animals, human mutations, and a thorough literature review. When assimilated, this weight of evidence evaluation may be sufficient to inform risk for specific clinical indications and patient populations. While under current guidance this approach is only applicable for drugs and biologics for oncology, the authors would like to suggest that this approach may also be appropriate for other disease indications. When there is an unacceptable level of uncertainty and a toxicity study in pregnant animals could impact human risk assessment, then such studies should be considered. Determination of appropriate nonclinical species for developmental toxicity studies to inform human risk should consider species-specific limitations, reproductive physiology, and pharmacology of the biopharmaceutical. This paper will provide considerations and examples of the weight of evidence approach to evaluating the human risk of developmental toxicity of biopharmaceuticals.

摘要

在评估生物制药的发育毒性对人类的风险时,并非总是需要对妊娠动物进行毒性研究。随着目标生物学和分子特异性药代动力学方面经验和信息的不断增加,使用基于证据的方法来准确预测生物制药对靶标结合的影响,是一种强有力的方法。基于证据的评估应包括所有可用数据,包括目标生物学、药代动力学、类效应、基因修饰动物、人类突变和全面的文献综述。当综合考虑这些证据时,这种评估可能足以告知特定临床适应症和患者人群的风险。虽然在现行指导原则下,这种方法仅适用于肿瘤学的药物和生物制剂,但作者建议,这种方法也可能适用于其他疾病适应症。当存在不可接受的不确定性水平并且妊娠动物的毒性研究可能会影响对人类风险的评估时,则应考虑进行此类研究。为了告知人类风险,确定用于发育毒性研究的合适非临床物种时,应考虑物种特异性限制、生物制药的生殖生理学和药理学。本文将提供考虑因素和示例,说明如何使用基于证据的方法来评估生物制药的发育毒性对人类的风险。

相似文献

1
Applying a weight of evidence approach to the evaluation of developmental toxicity of biopharmaceuticals.应用证据权重方法评估生物制药的发育毒性。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;98:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
2
Developmental toxicity testing of biopharmaceuticals in nonhuman primates: previous experience and future directions.生物制药在非人灵长类动物中的发育毒性测试:既往经验与未来方向。
Int J Toxicol. 2010 Dec;29(6):552-68. doi: 10.1177/1091581810378896. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
3
Considerations in assessing the developmental and reproductive toxicity potential of biopharmaceuticals.评估生物制药潜在的发育和生殖毒性时的注意事项。
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2009 Jun;86(3):176-203. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20197.
4
Review of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies performed for pharmaceuticals approved by FDA in 2018 and 2019.2018 年和 2019 年美国食品和药物管理局批准的药物的胚胎-胎儿发育毒性研究综述。
Reprod Toxicol. 2021 Jan;99:144-151. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
New approach methodologies to confirm developmental toxicity of pharmaceuticals based on weight of evidence.基于证据权重的确认药物发育毒性的新方法学途径。
Reprod Toxicol. 2024 Oct;129:108686. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108686. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
6
A strategy for safety assessment of chemicals with data gaps for developmental and/or reproductive toxicity.针对发育和/或生殖毒性数据存在缺口的化学品的安全性评估策略。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;72(2):202-15. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
7
Testing developmental toxicity in a second species: are the differences due to species or replication error?在第二个物种中测试发育毒性:差异是由于物种差异还是重复误差?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;107:104410. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104410. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
8
Review of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies performed for recent FDA-approved pharmaceuticals.对近期美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的药品所进行的胚胎-胎儿发育毒性研究综述。
Reprod Toxicol. 2016 Sep;64:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.04.018. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
9
Profiling the activity of environmental chemicals in prenatal developmental toxicity studies using the U.S. EPA's ToxRefDB.利用美国环境保护局的ToxRefDB对产前发育毒性研究中的环境化学物质活性进行分析。
Reprod Toxicol. 2009 Sep;28(2):209-19. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
10
Exposure assessments in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing: An IQ-DruSafe industry survey on current practices and experiences in support of exposure-based high dose selection.生殖和发育毒性测试中的暴露评估:IQ-DruSafe 行业调查当前实践和经验,以支持基于暴露的高剂量选择。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;107:104413. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104413. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Carbohydrate Intake on the Gut Microbiome: A Weight of Evidence Systematic Review.碳水化合物摄入对肠道微生物群的作用:证据权重系统评价
Microorganisms. 2023 Jun 30;11(7):1728. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071728.
2
Challenges of non-clinical safety testing for biologics: A Report of the 9th BioSafe European Annual General Membership Meeting.生物制品非临床安全性测试面临的挑战:第 9 届 BioSafe 欧洲年度会员大会报告。
MAbs. 2021 Jan-Dec;13(1):1938796. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2021.1938796.
3
Animal Models for In Vivo Lactation Studies: Anatomy, Physiology and Milk Compositions in the Most Used Non-Clinical Species: A Contribution from the ConcePTION Project.
用于体内泌乳研究的动物模型:常用非临床物种的解剖学、生理学和乳汁成分:来自ConcePTION项目的贡献
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;11(3):714. doi: 10.3390/ani11030714.