• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊轻度创伤性脑损伤检查的时间过程。

Emergency Department Time Course for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Workup.

机构信息

Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, El Paso, Texas.

University of Virginia Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;19(4):635-640. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.5.37293. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2018.5.37293
PMID:30013697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6040897/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common cause for visits to the emergency department (ED). The actual time required for an ED workup of a patient with mTBI in the United States is not well known. National emergency medicine organizations have recommended reducing unnecessary testing, including head computed tomography (CT) for these patients.10.

METHODS

To examine this issue, we developed a care map that included each step of evaluation of mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale Score 13-15) - from initial presentation to the ED to discharge. Time spent at each step was estimated by a panel of United States emergency physicians and nurses. We subsequently validated time estimates using retrospectively collected, real-time data at two EDs. Length of stay (LOS) time differences between admission and discharged patients were calculated for patients being evaluated for mTBI.

RESULTS

Evaluation for mTBI was estimated at 401 minutes (6.6 hours) in EDs. Time related to head CT comprised about one-half of the total LOS. Real-time data from two sites corroborated the estimate of median time difference between ED admission and discharge, at 6.3 hours for mTBI.

CONCLUSION

Limiting use of head CT as part of the workup of mTBI to more serious cases may reduce time spent in the ED and potentially improve overall ED throughput.

摘要

简介

轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)是急诊科就诊的常见原因。美国对 mTBI 患者进行急诊科检查所需的实际时间尚不清楚。国家急诊医学组织建议减少不必要的检查,包括这些患者的头部计算机断层扫描(CT)。10.

方法

为了研究这个问题,我们开发了一个护理图,其中包括对 mTBI(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分 13-15)评估的每个步骤-从最初到急诊科就诊到出院。美国急诊医生和护士小组估计了每个步骤所花费的时间。随后,我们使用两家急诊科的回顾性实时数据验证了时间估算。计算了接受 mTBI 评估的患者的入院和出院之间的住院时间(LOS)差异。

结果

急诊科对 mTBI 的评估耗时 401 分钟(6.6 小时)。头部 CT 相关时间约占总 LOS 的一半。来自两个地点的实时数据证实了 ED 入院和出院之间的中位时间差异估计值,mTBI 为 6.3 小时。

结论

将头部 CT 作为 mTBI 检查的一部分,仅用于更严重的病例,可能会减少在急诊科的时间,并有可能提高整体急诊科的吞吐量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b21e/6040897/4728fb927fd4/wjem-19-635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b21e/6040897/4728fb927fd4/wjem-19-635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b21e/6040897/4728fb927fd4/wjem-19-635-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Emergency Department Time Course for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Workup.急诊轻度创伤性脑损伤检查的时间过程。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;19(4):635-640. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.5.37293. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
Understanding Why Patients Return to the Emergency Department after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury within 72 Hours.了解轻度创伤性脑损伤患者在72小时内重返急诊科的原因。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 May;16(3):481-5. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.2.23546. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
3
The epidemiology of mild traumatic brain injury: the Trondheim MTBI follow-up study.轻度创伤性脑损伤的流行病学:特隆赫姆 MTBI 随访研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Apr 27;26(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0495-0.
4
Emergency department visits for mild traumatic brain injury in early childhood.幼儿期轻度创伤性脑损伤的急诊就诊情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;65:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.12.035. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
5
Repeat neuroimaging of mild traumatic brain-injured patients with acute traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: clinical outcomes and radiographic features.轻度创伤性脑损伤伴急性创伤性颅内出血患者的重复神经影像学检查:临床结局和影像学特征
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1083-91. doi: 10.1111/acem.12479.
6
Stockholm score of lesion detection on computed tomography following mild traumatic brain injury (SELECT-TBI): study protocol for a multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study.轻度创伤性脑损伤(SELECT-TBI)后计算机断层扫描的病变检测斯德哥尔摩评分:一项多中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e060679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060679.
7
Mild traumatic brain injury: are ED providers identifying which patients are at risk?轻度创伤性脑损伤:急诊科医护人员能识别出哪些患者有风险吗?
J Emerg Nurs. 2012 Sep;38(5):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
8
Effect of testing and treatment on emergency department length of stay using a national database.利用国家数据库研究检测与治疗对急诊科住院时长的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 May;19(5):525-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01353.x.
9
Reduction of Computed Tomography Use for Pediatric Closed Head Injury Evaluation at a Nonpediatric Community Emergency Department.非儿科社区急诊部降低儿童闭合性颅脑损伤评估的计算机断层扫描使用率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;26(7):784-795. doi: 10.1111/acem.13666. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
10
Outcomes of a novel ED observation pathway for mild traumatic brain injury and associated intracranial hemorrhage.新型 ED 观察路径治疗轻度创伤性脑损伤及相关颅内出血的结果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.093. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Change in Emergency Department Length of Stay following Routine Adoption of Dual-Energy CT to Differentiate Intracranial Hemorrhage from Calcification.常规采用双能CT鉴别颅内出血与钙化后急诊科住院时间的变化
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 May 2;46(5):950-955. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8610.
2
Accuracy of a rapid glial fibrillary acidic protein/ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 test for the prediction of intracranial injuries on head computed tomography after mild traumatic brain injury.快速神经丝酸性蛋白/泛素羧基末端水解酶 L1 检测对轻度颅脑损伤后头部 CT 预测颅内损伤的准确性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;28(11):1308-1317. doi: 10.1111/acem.14366. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Describing wait time bottlenecks for ED patients undergoing head CT.描述接受头部CT检查的急诊患者的等待时间瓶颈。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;35(10):1510-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.04.059. Epub 2017 May 1.
2
Emergency Department Triage of Traumatic Head Injury Using a Brain Electrical Activity Biomarker: A Multisite Prospective Observational Validation Trial.使用脑电活动生物标志物对创伤性脑损伤进行急诊科分诊:一项多中心前瞻性观察性验证试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):617-627. doi: 10.1111/acem.13175. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
3
Emergency Department Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States, 2009-2010.
Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study.
急性轻度创伤性脑损伤的识别挑战:来自急诊科监测研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 3;10(2):e034494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034494.
2009 - 2010年美国急诊科对创伤性脑损伤的评估
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Nov/Dec;31(6):379-387. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000187.
4
Trends in visits for traumatic brain injury to emergency departments in the United States.美国急诊科创伤性脑损伤就诊趋势。
JAMA. 2014 May 14;311(18):1917-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3979.
5
Evaluation and management of mild traumatic brain injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.轻度创伤性脑损伤的评估和管理:东部创伤外科学会实践管理指南。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5 Suppl 4):S307-14. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182701885.
6
Management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department.急诊科轻度创伤性脑损伤的管理
Emerg Med Pract. 2012 Sep;14(9):1-24. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
7
Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation.成人和儿童轻微头部损伤的诊断管理策略:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Aug;15(27):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta15270.
8
Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting.临床政策:急性成人轻度创伤性脑损伤的神经影像学检查与决策制定
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;52(6):714-48. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.021.
9
Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury.轻度头部损伤患者的计算机断层扫描指征。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 13;343(2):100-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430204.