Chang Lun-Hsien, Couvy-Duchesne Baptiste, Medland Sarah E, Gillespie Nathan A, Hickie Ian B, Parker Richard, Martin Nicholas G
Genetic Epidemiology,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute,Brisbane,Queensland,Australia.
Institute for Molecular Bioscience,University of Queensland,Brisbane,Queensland,Australia.
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2018 Oct;21(5):347-360. doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.33. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
Psychological distress (PSYCH), somatic distress (SOMA), affective disorders (AD), and substance use (SU) frequently co-occur. The genetic relationship between PSYCH and SOMA, however, remains understudied. We examined the genetic and environmental influences on these two disorders and their comorbid AD and SU using structural equation modeling. Self-reported PSYCH and SOMA were measured in 1,548 twins using the two subscales of a 12-item questionnaire, the Somatic and Psychological Health Report. Its reliability and psychometric properties were examined. Six ADs, involvement of licit and illicit substance, and two SU disorders were obtained from 1,663-2,132 twins using the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview and/or from an online adaption of the same. SU phenotypes (heritability: 49-79%) were found to be more heritable than the affective disorder phenotypes (heritability: 32-42%), SOMA (heritability: 25%), and PSYCH (heritability: 23%). We fit separate non-parametric item response theory models for PSYCH, SOMA, AD, and SU. The IRT scores were used as the refined phenotypes for fitting multivariate genetic models. The best-fitting model showed the similar amount of genetic overlap between PSYCH-AD (genetic correlation rG = 0.49) and SOMA-AD (rG =0.53), as well as between PSYCH-SU (rG = 0.23) and SOMA-SU (rG = 0.25). Unique environmental factors explained 53% to 76% of the variance in each of these four phenotypes, whereas additive genetic factors explained 17% to 46% of the variance. The covariance between the four phenotypes was largely explained by unique environmental factors. Common genetic factor had a significant influence on all the four phenotypes, but they explained a moderate portion of the covariance.
心理困扰(PSYCH)、躯体困扰(SOMA)、情感障碍(AD)和物质使用(SU)常常同时出现。然而,PSYCH和SOMA之间的遗传关系仍未得到充分研究。我们使用结构方程模型研究了遗传和环境因素对这两种障碍及其共病的AD和SU的影响。使用12项问卷《躯体与心理健康报告》的两个分量表,对1548对双胞胎进行了自我报告的PSYCH和SOMA测量。对其信度和心理测量特性进行了检验。使用世界心理健康综合国际诊断访谈和/或其在线改编版,从1663 - 2132对双胞胎中获取了六种AD、合法和非法物质使用情况以及两种SU障碍。发现SU表型(遗传率:49 - 79%)比情感障碍表型(遗传率:32 - 42%)、SOMA(遗传率:25%)和PSYCH(遗传率:23%)更具遗传性。我们为PSYCH、SOMA、AD和SU分别拟合了非参数项目反应理论模型。IRT分数用作拟合多变量遗传模型的精细表型。最佳拟合模型显示PSYCH - AD(遗传相关rG = 0.49)和SOMA - AD(rG = 0.53)之间以及PSYCH - SU(rG = 0.23)和SOMA - SU(rG = 0.25)之间的遗传重叠量相似。独特环境因素解释了这四种表型中每种表型53%至76%的变异,而加性遗传因素解释了17%至46%的变异。这四种表型之间的协方差在很大程度上由独特环境因素解释。共同遗传因素对所有四种表型都有显著影响,但它们解释了协方差的一部分。