Suppr超能文献

不同矫形干预对膝内翻畸形的膝骨关节炎患者膝关节负荷参数的急性影响。

Acute effects of different orthotic interventions on knee loading parameters in knee osteoarthritis patients with varus malalignment.

作者信息

Mauricio Elsa, Sliepen Maik, Rosenbaum Dieter

机构信息

Funktionsbereich Bewegungsanalytik, IEMM, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, Gebäude D3, 48129 Münster, Germany.

Funktionsbereich Bewegungsanalytik, IEMM, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, Gebäude D3, 48129 Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Knee. 2018 Oct;25(5):825-833. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common form of arthritis with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 45%. The use of orthotic devices is a generally accepted conservative therapy in KOA. A new conservative treatment is an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO); however, studies on the biomechanical effects are limited. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of different orthotic devices (AFO, knee brace and wedged shoes) on (un)loading parameters in subjects with KOA.

METHODS

Fifty-two medial KOA patients (mean age 59 (standard deviation (SD) 10) years and mean body mass index 27.5 (SD 4.9) kg/m) were recruited. Three-dimensional gait analysis was undertaken with different interventions in a randomized order: control (own shoes), new AFO, conventional unloader brace and laterally wedged shoes (six degrees).

RESULTS

Significant decreases of 27% and nine percent in first peak knee adduction moment (KAM) were observed for the AFO and wedged shoes, respectively, in comparison with the control. Significant decreases of 21%, seven percent and 18% in the KAM impulse were observed for the AFO, brace and wedged shoes, respectively, compared to the control. The knee flexion moment (KFM) increased compared to the control for all conditions, but only significantly while using the AFO, showing an increase of 26% as compared to the control.

CONCLUSIONS

The AFO and wedged shoes were more effective in unloading the medial compartment of the knee compared to the unloader brace. However, the effect of an increased KFM on KOA remains unclear and requires further investigation.

摘要

背景

膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)是最常见的关节炎形式,估计终生患病率为45%。使用矫形器械是KOA中普遍接受的保守治疗方法。一种新的保守治疗方法是踝足矫形器(AFO);然而,关于其生物力学效应的研究有限。本研究的目的是检查不同矫形器械(AFO、膝关节支具和楔形鞋)对KOA患者(非)负重参数的急性影响。

方法

招募了52名内侧KOA患者(平均年龄59(标准差(SD)10)岁,平均体重指数27.5(SD 4.9)kg/m)。采用随机顺序对不同干预措施进行三维步态分析:对照(自己的鞋子)、新型AFO、传统卸载支具和外侧楔形鞋(6度)。

结果

与对照相比,AFO和楔形鞋的首次峰值膝关节内收力矩(KAM)分别显著降低了27%和9%。与对照相比,AFO、支具和楔形鞋的KAM冲量分别显著降低了21%、7%和18%。与对照相比,所有情况下膝关节屈曲力矩(KFM)均增加,但仅在使用AFO时显著增加,与对照相比增加了26%。

结论

与卸载支具相比,AFO和楔形鞋在减轻膝关节内侧间室负荷方面更有效。然而,KFM增加对KOA的影响仍不清楚,需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验