Bartsch Leonie P, Schwarze Martin, Block Julia, Alimusaj Merkur, Hadzic Anela, Renkawitz Tobias, Wolf Sebastian I
Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany..
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep;103(9):1699-1706. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
To investigate the relationship of frontal plane ankle mobility with the effects of an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) and a laterally wedged insole (LWI) on knee adduction moment (KAM) in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis.
Randomized, nonblinded crossover trial.
Outpatient clinic of university hospital.
Referred sample of 20 patients (N=20) with medial knee osteoarthritis stage 1-3 (Kellgren and Lawrence), aged 56.4±6.5 years; 58 patients were assessed, 21 were included, and 1 was a dropout. There were 14 healthy reference participants without knee osteoarthritis (convenience sample) who were matched by age.
Patients received AFO and LWI for 6 weeks each with gait analysis after each 6-week intervention. Patients underwent additional barefoot gait analysis, walking on even ground and on a cross slope of 5° lateral elevation and standing on inclinations of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 20°.
Spearman correlation between the immediate change in first peak of KAM with each aid and the change in hindfoot varus on the cross slope relative to level ground.
The KAM reduction with AFO correlated significantly with hindfoot varus reaction to the cross slope during walking: the greater the hindfoot valgization on the cross slope, the greater the KAM reduction with AFO (Spearman ρ=0.53, P=.02). The KAM reduction with LWI correlated moderately negatively with the change in hindfoot varus: the greater the hindfoot valgization on the cross slope, the smaller the KAM reduction with LWI (r=-0.31 P=.18).
LWI may be suitable for patients with limited to normal frontal plane ankle mobility. Patients with greater frontal plane ankle mobility benefit most from frontal plane ankle bridging with AFO. Studies with larger samples are necessary.
探讨在治疗膝关节内侧骨关节炎时,额状面踝关节活动度与踝足矫形器(AFO)和外侧楔形鞋垫(LWI)对膝关节内收力矩(KAM)影响之间的关系。
随机、非盲交叉试验。
大学医院门诊。
转诊的20例膝关节内侧骨关节炎1-3期(凯尔格伦和劳伦斯分级)患者样本(N = 20),年龄56.4±6.5岁;共评估58例患者,21例纳入研究,1例退出。有14名无膝关节骨关节炎的健康对照参与者(便利样本),按年龄匹配。
患者分别佩戴AFO和LWI各6周,每次6周干预后进行步态分析。患者还接受了额外的赤足步态分析,包括在平坦地面行走、在5°外侧抬高的斜坡上行走以及在0°、5°、10°和20°的斜坡上站立。
每种辅助器具使用时KAM第一峰值的即时变化与相对于平坦地面在斜坡上后足内翻变化之间的Spearman相关性。
AFO使KAM降低与行走时后足内翻对斜坡的反应显著相关:斜坡上后足外翻越大,AFO使KAM降低越多(Spearman ρ = 0.53,P = 0.02)。LWI使KAM降低与后足内翻变化呈中度负相关:斜坡上后足外翻越大,LWI使KAM降低越少(r = -0.31,P = 0.18)。
LWI可能适用于额状面踝关节活动度有限至正常的患者。额状面踝关节活动度较大的患者从使用AFO进行额状面踝关节搭桥中获益最大。需要进行更大样本量的研究。