GENUD (Growth, Exercise, NUtrition and Development) Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Edificio del SAI, C/Pedro Cerbuna s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Zaragoza, Spain.
Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;272:333-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.053. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Socioeconomic disadvantages during childhood are hypothesised to have negative implications for health. We aimed to investigate the association between socioeconomic disadvantages and children's total metabolic syndrome (MetS) score at baseline and follow-up and the extent to which socioeconomic disadvantages over time and the accumulation of these socioeconomic disadvantages can affect children's MetS risk.
The two-year longitudinal IDEFICS study included 2401 European children (aged 2.0-9.9) with complete information of the 16,229 participating at baseline. Sociodemographic variables, psychosocial factors and lifestyle were proxy-reported via questionnaires. Socioeconomically disadvantaged groups included children from families with low income, low education, migrant origin, unemployed parents, parents who lacked a social network, and from non-traditional families. MetS risk score was calculated as the sum of z-scores of waist circumference, blood pressure, lipids and insulin resistance. Linear mixed-effects models were used to study the association between social disadvantages and MetS risk. Models were adjusted for sex, age, well-being and lifestyle (fruit and vegetables consumption, physical activity, screen time).
At both time points, children from low-income families (0.20 [0.03-0.37]); (β estimate and 99% confidence interval), children from non-traditional families (0.14 [0.02-0.26]), children whose parents were unemployed (0.31 [0.05-0.57]) and children who accumulated >3 disadvantages (0.21 [0.04-0.37]) showed a higher MetS score compared to non-socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.
Children from socioeconomically disadvantaged families are at high metabolic risk independently of diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviours and well-being. Interventions focusing on these socioeconomically disadvantaged groups should be developed to tackle health disparities.
儿童时期的社会经济劣势被假设对健康有负面影响。我们旨在研究社会经济劣势与儿童基线和随访时的总代谢综合征(MetS)评分之间的关系,以及社会经济劣势随时间的变化及其积累对儿童 MetS 风险的影响程度。
为期两年的 IDEFICS 纵向研究纳入了 2401 名欧洲儿童(年龄 2.0-9.9 岁),其中 16229 名儿童在基线时完成了完整的信息采集。通过问卷代理报告了社会人口统计学变量、心理社会因素和生活方式。社会经济弱势群体包括来自低收入家庭、低教育程度家庭、移民家庭、失业父母家庭、缺乏社交网络的父母家庭和非传统家庭的儿童。MetS 风险评分计算为腰围、血压、血脂和胰岛素抵抗的 z 分数之和。使用线性混合效应模型研究社会劣势与 MetS 风险之间的关系。模型调整了性别、年龄、幸福感和生活方式(水果和蔬菜摄入、身体活动、屏幕时间)。
在两个时间点,来自低收入家庭的儿童(0.20 [0.03-0.37]);(β估计值和 99%置信区间)、来自非传统家庭的儿童(0.14 [0.02-0.26])、父母失业的儿童(0.31 [0.05-0.57])和累积>3 种劣势的儿童(0.21 [0.04-0.37])与非社会经济弱势群体相比,MetS 评分更高。
来自社会经济弱势群体的儿童在饮食、身体活动、久坐行为和幸福感方面存在较高的代谢风险。应制定针对这些社会经济弱势群体的干预措施,以解决健康差异问题。