Jørgensen Rasmus Møller, Støvring Henrik, Østergaard Jane Nautrup, Hede Susanne, Svendsen Katrine, Vestergaard Esben Thyssen, Bruun Jens Meldgaard
Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Obes Facts. 2024;17(6):570-581. doi: 10.1159/000540389. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
Several evaluations of lifestyle interventions for childhood obesity exist; however, follow-up beyond 2 years is necessary to validate the effect. The aim of the present study was to investigate long-term weight development following children participating in one of two pragmatic family-centered lifestyle interventions treating childhood obesity.
This real-life observational study included Danish children 4-17 years of age classified as having obesity. Data from 2010 to 2020, from two community-based family-centered lifestyle interventions (designated hereafter as the Aarhus- and the Randers-intervention) were merged with national registers and routine health check-ups, including height and weight. Adjusted mixed effect models were used to model changes in body mass index (BMI) z score. We performed exploratory analyses of the development in BMI z-score within stratified subgroups of children treated in the interventions before investigating potential effect modifications induced by sex, age, family structure, socioeconomic, or immigration status.
With a median follow-up of 2.8 years (interquartile range: 1.3; 4.8), 703 children participated in an intervention (445 the Aarhus-intervention; 258 the Randers-intervention) and 2,337 children were not invited to participate (no-intervention). Children in both interventions experienced a comparable reduction in BMI z-scores during the first 6 months compared to the no-intervention group (Aarhus-intervention: -0.12 SD/year and Randers-intervention: -0.25 SD/year). Only children in the Randers-intervention reduced their BMI z-score throughout follow-up (Aarhus-intervention vs. no-intervention: 0.01 SD/year; confidence interval [CI]: -0.01; 0.04; Randers-intervention vs. no-intervention: -0.05 SD/year; CI: -0.08; -0.02). In subgroup comparisons, combining the two interventions, family income below the median (-0.05 SD/year, CI: -0.02; -0.09), immigrant background (0.04 SD/year, CI: 0.00; 0.07), or receiving intervention less than 1 year (0.04 SD/year, CI: 0.00; 0.08) were associated with a yearly increase in BMI z score. In addition, effect modification analyses did not observe any interaction by sex, age, family structure, socioeconomic, or immigration.
Although the more dynamic intervention with longer duration obtained and sustained a minor reduction in BMI z score, the clinical impact may only be modest and still not effective enough to induce a long-term beneficial development in BMI in children with obesity.
目前已有多项针对儿童肥胖的生活方式干预评估;然而,需要2年以上的随访来验证其效果。本研究的目的是调查参与两种以家庭为中心的实用生活方式干预措施之一来治疗儿童肥胖的儿童的长期体重发展情况。
这项现实生活观察性研究纳入了4至17岁被归类为肥胖的丹麦儿童。将2010年至2020年来自两项以社区为基础的以家庭为中心的生活方式干预措施(以下分别称为奥胡斯干预和兰讷斯干预)的数据与国家登记册和常规健康检查(包括身高和体重)相结合。使用调整后的混合效应模型对体重指数(BMI)z评分的变化进行建模。在调查性别、年龄、家庭结构、社会经济或移民身份引起的潜在效应修正之前,我们对接受干预的儿童分层亚组内的BMI z评分发展进行了探索性分析。
中位随访时间为2.8年(四分位间距:1.3;4.8),703名儿童参与了干预(445名参与奥胡斯干预;258名参与兰讷斯干预),2337名儿童未被邀请参与(未干预)。与未干预组相比,两项干预措施中的儿童在最初6个月内BMI z评分均有类似程度的降低(奥胡斯干预:-0.12标准差/年,兰讷斯干预:-0.25标准差/年)。只有参与兰讷斯干预的儿童在整个随访期间BMI z评分降低(奥胡斯干预与未干预组相比:0.01标准差/年;置信区间[CI]:-0.01;0.04;兰讷斯干预与未干预组相比:-0.05标准差/年;CI:-0.08;-0.02)。在亚组比较中,综合两项干预措施来看,家庭收入低于中位数(-0.05标准差/年,CI:-0.02;-0.09)、有移民背景(0.04标准差/年,CI:0.00;0.07)或接受干预少于1年(0.04标准差/年,CI:0.00;0.08)与BMI z评分每年增加相关。此外,效应修正分析未观察到性别、年龄、家庭结构、社会经济或移民方面的任何相互作用。
尽管持续时间更长的更动态干预措施使BMI z评分获得并维持了轻微降低,但临床影响可能仅为中等程度,仍不足以有效促使肥胖儿童的BMI实现长期有益发展。