• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们按自己的理解行事:被理解为一项任务的扩展行为会作为一个认知实体来执行。

We do as we construe: extended behavior construed as one task is executed as one cognitive entity.

作者信息

Farooqui Ausaf A, Manly Tom

机构信息

MRC-Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2019 Feb;83(1):84-103. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1051-2. Epub 2018 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-018-1051-2
PMID:30022243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6373351/
Abstract

We select and execute extended task episodes ('make tea') as one entity and not individually execute their very many components (find kettle, boil water, etc.). Such hierarchical execution is thought to occur in familiar task situations with pre-existing task episode-related scripts that once selected, control the identity and sequence of component steps. Here, in contrast, we show hierarchical execution of extended behavior in situations, where the identity and sequence of component steps were unknown and a predetermined script could not have existed. Participants performed a rule-switching task in which the rule to be applied on each trial could not be predicted. Crucially, they were biased into construing a recurring instance of three or five trials as a single task episode. Behavioral signs of hierarchical execution, identical to those seen during memorized task-sequence executions, were present. These included longer reaction time on the first trial of each episode that was proportionate to the length of that episode, and absence of rule switch costs only between those consecutive trials that crossed episode boundaries. Hierarchical execution thus occurs every time the to-be-executed behavior is construed as one task episode, and is not limited to predictable sequences. We suggest that hierarchical execution occurs because task episodes are controlled and executed through goal-related entities assembled at the beginning of execution that subsume the execution and instantiate purposive control across time until the goal is complete.

摘要

我们将扩展任务情节(“泡茶”)作为一个整体来选择和执行,而不是单独执行其众多组成部分(找到水壶、烧水等)。这种分层执行被认为发生在熟悉的任务情境中,这些情境具有预先存在的与任务情节相关的脚本,一旦被选中,就会控制组成步骤的识别和顺序。相比之下,在这里我们展示了在组成步骤的识别和顺序未知且不可能存在预定脚本的情况下扩展行为的分层执行。参与者执行了一项规则切换任务,其中每次试验要应用的规则是无法预测的。关键的是,他们倾向于将三到五次试验的重复实例解释为一个单一的任务情节。出现了与记忆任务序列执行期间所见相同的分层执行行为迹象。这些迹象包括每个情节的第一次试验中较长的反应时间,该时间与该情节的长度成比例,并且仅在跨越情节边界的那些连续试验之间不存在规则切换成本。因此,每当待执行的行为被解释为一个任务情节时就会发生分层执行,并且不限于可预测的序列。我们认为发生分层执行是因为任务情节是通过在执行开始时组装的与目标相关的实体来控制和执行的,这些实体包含执行并在目标完成之前跨时间实例化目的控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/7129e0d0ae18/426_2018_1051_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/ea6b25e434a8/426_2018_1051_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/4b2cbe58c556/426_2018_1051_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/1d4672bbddaf/426_2018_1051_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/f9cf1da76ae3/426_2018_1051_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/34075937dafb/426_2018_1051_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/364e3cf3e4c0/426_2018_1051_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/7129e0d0ae18/426_2018_1051_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/ea6b25e434a8/426_2018_1051_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/4b2cbe58c556/426_2018_1051_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/1d4672bbddaf/426_2018_1051_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/f9cf1da76ae3/426_2018_1051_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/34075937dafb/426_2018_1051_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/364e3cf3e4c0/426_2018_1051_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1196/6373351/7129e0d0ae18/426_2018_1051_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
We do as we construe: extended behavior construed as one task is executed as one cognitive entity.我们按自己的理解行事:被理解为一项任务的扩展行为会作为一个认知实体来执行。
Psychol Res. 2019 Feb;83(1):84-103. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1051-2. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
2
Hierarchical Cognition Causes Task-Related Deactivations but Not Just in Default Mode Regions.层次认知导致任务相关的去激活,但不仅仅是在默认模式区域。
eNeuro. 2019 Jan 2;5(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0008-18.2018. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
3
Hierarchical Representation of Multistep Tasks in Multiple-Demand and Default Mode Networks.多需求和默认模式网络中多步骤任务的分层表示。
J Neurosci. 2020 Sep 30;40(40):7724-7738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0594-20.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
4
GIVE me your attention: Differentiating goal identification and goal execution components of the anti-saccade effect.请注意:区分反扫视效应的目标识别和目标执行成分。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 23;14(9):e0222710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222710. eCollection 2019.
5
Developing control over the execution of scripts: The role of maintained hierarchical goal representations.发展对脚本执行的控制:保持层次化目标表征的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Nov;163:87-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.06.008.
6
Task intentions and their implementation into actions: cognitive control from adolescence to middle adulthood.任务意图及其转化为行动:从青少年到中年期的认知控制
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):215-229. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0927-x. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
7
Slowing after Observed Error Transfers across Tasks.观察到跨任务错误转移后的减速。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 2;11(3):e0149836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149836. eCollection 2016.
8
Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.额顶叶皮层中任务集表征的逐次动态编码介导行为灵活性。
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 8;37(45):11037-11050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0935-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
9
Game-based training of flexibility and attention improves task-switch performance: near and far transfer of cognitive training in an EEG study.基于游戏的灵活性和注意力训练可提高任务切换表现:一项脑电图研究中认知训练的近迁移和远迁移
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):186-202. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0933-z. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Stimulus- and response-based interference contributes to the costs of switching between cognitive tasks.基于刺激和反应的干扰会增加在认知任务之间切换的成本。
Psychol Res. 2020 Jun;84(4):1112-1125. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1113-5. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Chunking of Control: An Unrecognized Aspect of Cognitive Resource Limits.控制的组块化:认知资源限制中一个未被认识到的方面。
J Cogn. 2023 May 4;6(1):25. doi: 10.5334/joc.275. eCollection 2023.
2
Abstract sequential task control is facilitated by practice and embedded motor sequences.摘要 连续任务控制通过练习和嵌入式运动序列来实现。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(10):1638-1659. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001004. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Parsing Neurodynamic Information Streams to Estimate the Frequency, Magnitude and Duration of Team Uncertainty.

本文引用的文献

1
Hierarchical Cognition Causes Task-Related Deactivations but Not Just in Default Mode Regions.层次认知导致任务相关的去激活,但不仅仅是在默认模式区域。
eNeuro. 2019 Jan 2;5(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0008-18.2018. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
2
The Necessity of Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Higher-Level Sequential Behavior.腹外侧前额叶皮质对高级序列行为的必要性。
Neuron. 2015 Sep 23;87(6):1357-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.026.
3
Habits as action sequences: hierarchical action control and changes in outcome value.作为动作序列的习惯:分层动作控制与结果价值的变化
解析神经动力学信息流以估计团队不确定性的频率、幅度和持续时间。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Feb 1;15:606823. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.606823. eCollection 2021.
4
Hierarchical Representation of Multistep Tasks in Multiple-Demand and Default Mode Networks.多需求和默认模式网络中多步骤任务的分层表示。
J Neurosci. 2020 Sep 30;40(40):7724-7738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0594-20.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
5
Hierarchical Cognition Causes Task-Related Deactivations but Not Just in Default Mode Regions.层次认知导致任务相关的去激活,但不仅仅是在默认模式区域。
eNeuro. 2019 Jan 2;5(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0008-18.2018. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 5;369(1655). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0482.
4
Chunking away task-switch costs: a test of the chunk-point hypothesis.消除任务切换成本:组块点假说的一项检验
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Jun;22(3):884-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0721-3.
5
Long-term memory and the control of attentional control.长期记忆与注意力控制的调控
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jul;72:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
6
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
7
Hierarchical organization of cognition reflected in distributed frontoparietal activity.认知的层级组织反映在分布式额顶叶活动中。
J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 28;32(48):17373-81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0598-12.2012.
8
The cost of serially chaining two cognitive operations.连续执行两个认知操作的成本。
Psychol Res. 2012 Sep;76(5):566-78. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0375-y. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
9
Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities.争用调度和常规活动的控制。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Jun 1;17(4):297-338. doi: 10.1080/026432900380427.
10
Control and interference in task switching--a review.任务转换的控制与干扰——综述。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):849-74. doi: 10.1037/a0019842.