• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何识别无症状颈动脉狭窄患者中哪些人可以从颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术获益。

How to identify which patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis could benefit from endarterectomy or stenting.

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Department of Vascular Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.

出版信息

Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Feb 24;3(2):92-100. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000129. eCollection 2018 Jun.

DOI:10.1136/svn-2017-000129
PMID:30022795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6047337/
Abstract

Offering routine carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) to patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACS) is no longer considered as the optimal management of these patients. Equally suboptimal, however, is the policy of offering only best medical treatment (BMT) to all patients with ACS and not considering any of them for prophylactic CEA. In the last few years, there have been many studies aiming to identify reliable predictors of future cerebrovascular events that would allow the identification of patients with high-risk ACS and offer a prophylactic carotid intervention only to these patients to prevent them from becoming symptomatic. All patients with ACS should receive BMT. The present article will summarise the evidence suggesting ways to identify these high-risk asymptomatic individuals, namely: (1) microemboli detection on transcranial Doppler, (2) plaque echolucency on Duplex ultrasound, (3) progression in the severity of ACS, (4) silent embolic infarcts on brain CT/MRI, (5) reduced cerebrovascular reserve, (6) increased size of juxtaluminal hypoechoic area, (7) identification of intraplaque haemorrhage using MRI and (8) carotid ulceration. The evidence suggests that approximately 10%-15% of patents with asymptomatic stenosis might benefit from intervention; this will become more clear after publication of ongoing studies comparing stenting or endarterectomy with best medical therapy. In the meantime, no patient should be offered intervention unless there is evidence of high risk of ipsilateral stroke, from modalities such as those discussed here.

摘要

对于无症状颈动脉狭窄(ACS)患者,不再常规行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或颈动脉支架置入术(CAS),目前认为这并非此类患者的最佳治疗方案。同样不理想的是,对于所有 ACS 患者,仅给予最佳药物治疗(BMT),而不考虑对其进行预防性 CEA 的策略。近年来,已有许多研究旨在确定可靠的未来脑血管事件预测因子,以识别高危 ACS 患者,并仅对这些患者进行预防性颈动脉介入治疗,以防止其出现症状。所有 ACS 患者均应接受 BMT。本文将总结提示识别这些高危无症状个体的证据,包括:(1)经颅多普勒检测微栓子;(2)双功能超声检测斑块不匀质回声;(3)ACS 严重程度进展;(4)脑 CT/MRI 显示无症状栓塞性梗死;(5)脑血流储备减少;(6)管腔外低回声区增大;(7)使用 MRI 识别斑块内出血;(8)颈动脉溃疡。有证据表明,约 10%-15%的无症状狭窄患者可能从介入治疗中获益;这将在比较支架置入术或内膜切除术与最佳药物治疗的正在进行的研究发表后变得更加明确。在此期间,除非有同侧卒中的高危证据(如这里讨论的这些方法),否则不应向任何患者提供介入治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2419/6047337/24bb9ebb9440/svn-2017-000129f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2419/6047337/fea2b60c045c/svn-2017-000129f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2419/6047337/552b3a931c4c/svn-2017-000129f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2419/6047337/15ec93636d47/svn-2017-000129f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2419/6047337/24bb9ebb9440/svn-2017-000129f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2419/6047337/fea2b60c045c/svn-2017-000129f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2419/6047337/552b3a931c4c/svn-2017-000129f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2419/6047337/15ec93636d47/svn-2017-000129f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2419/6047337/24bb9ebb9440/svn-2017-000129f04.jpg

相似文献

1
How to identify which patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis could benefit from endarterectomy or stenting.如何识别无症状颈动脉狭窄患者中哪些人可以从颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术获益。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Feb 24;3(2):92-100. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000129. eCollection 2018 Jun.
2
Recent advances and controversial issues in the optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄最佳管理的最新进展及争议问题
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):695-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.004. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
3
Misconceptions regarding the adequacy of best medical intervention alone for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.关于无症状颈动脉狭窄仅靠最佳医学干预是否充分的误解。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):257-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.490. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
4
Appropriate management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状颈动脉狭窄的适当管理。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2016 Jun 24;1(2):64-71. doi: 10.1136/svn-2016-000016. eCollection 2016 Jun.
5
Contralateral Stenosis and Echolucent Plaque Morphology are Associated with Elevated Stroke Risk in Patients Treated with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis within a Controlled Clinical Trial (SPACE-2).在一项对照临床试验(SPACE-2)中,接受无症状颈动脉狭窄治疗的患者,对侧狭窄和回声不均匀斑块形态与升高的卒中风险相关。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105940. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105940. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
6
Carotid Endarterectomy versus Carotid Stenting or Best Medical Treatment in Asymptomatic Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis: A meta-analysis.无症状性严重颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术或最佳药物治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 May;20(5):413-423. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
7
Preoperative Dependent Functional Status Is Associated With Poor Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting in Both Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients.术前依赖性功能状态与症状性和无症状性患者颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后的不良结局相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:114-127. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 May 15.
8
Transcranial Doppler monitoring for microemboli: a marker of a high-risk carotid plaque.经颅多普勒监测微栓子:高危颈动脉斑块的一个标志物。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;30(1):62-66. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
9
Identifying asymptomatic patients at high-risk for stroke.识别中风高危无症状患者。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Jun;60(3):332-344. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10912-3. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
10
Endarterectomy versus stenting for stroke prevention.颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术预防脑卒中的效果比较。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Feb 24;3(2):101-106. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000146. eCollection 2018 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Prediction of Cerebrovascular Ischemic Events Following Cervical Artery Dissections Using High-Intensity Transient Signals: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and a single center experience.利用高强度瞬态信号预测颈动脉硬化后脑血管缺血事件的风险:一项系统评价、荟萃分析及单中心经验
Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2025 May;5(3). doi: 10.1161/SVIN.124.001704. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
2
Peri-Carotid Adipose Tissue and Atherosclerosis at Carotid Bifurcation.颈动脉周围脂肪组织与颈动脉分叉处的动脉粥样硬化
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Feb 11;11(2):58. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11020058.
3
In vitro analysis of carotid lesions using a preliminary microwave sensor to detect vulnerable plaques: Correlation with histology, Duplex ultrasound examination, and computed tomography scanner: The Imaging and Microwave Phenotyping Assessment of Carotid stenosis Threat (IMPACT) study.

本文引用的文献

1
[18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging as a marker of carotid plaque inflammation: Comparison to immunohistology and relationship to acuity of events.[18F]-氟代脱氧葡萄糖 PET/CT 成像作为颈动脉斑块炎症的标志物:与免疫组化的比较及其与事件严重性的关系。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;271:378-386. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.057. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
2
Response to "Re: Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS)".对《关于“动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南”的回复》
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;55(6):902. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
3
使用初步微波传感器对颈动脉病变进行体外分析以检测易损斑块:与组织学、双功超声检查和计算机断层扫描仪的相关性:颈动脉狭窄威胁的成像和微波表型评估(IMPACT)研究。
JVS Vasc Sci. 2023 Dec 19;5:100182. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100182. eCollection 2024.
4
Quantifying Carotid Stenosis: History, Current Applications, Limitations, and Potential: How Imaging Is Changing the Scenario.量化颈动脉狭窄:历史、当前应用、局限性及潜力:影像学如何改变现状
Life (Basel). 2024 Jan 1;14(1):73. doi: 10.3390/life14010073.
5
Enhanced Carotid Plaque Echolucency Is Associated with Reduced Cognitive Performance in Elderly Patients with Atherosclerotic Disease Independently on Metabolic Profile.在患有动脉粥样硬化疾病的老年患者中,颈动脉斑块回声增强与认知功能下降相关,且独立于代谢状况。
Metabolites. 2023 Mar 27;13(4):478. doi: 10.3390/metabo13040478.
6
Comprehensive analysis of autophagy-related gene expression profiles identified five gene biomarkers associated with immune infiltration and advanced plaques in carotid atherosclerosis.对自噬相关基因表达谱进行综合分析,确定了与颈动脉粥样硬化中免疫浸润和进展斑块相关的五个基因生物标志物。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Mar 23;18(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02660-2.
7
Use of optical coherence tomography in selected patients with recurrent cryptogenic stroke: A case series and technical discussion.光学相干断层扫描在部分复发性隐源性卒中患者中的应用:病例系列及技术讨论
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Feb;31(1):88-94. doi: 10.1177/15910199221150472. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
8
Increased Regional Market Competition is Associated with a Lower Threshold for Revascularization in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.区域市场竞争加剧与无症状性颈动脉狭窄血管再通治疗阈值降低相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:164-173. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
9
Patient-Tailored Stenting versus Endarterectomy for the Treatment of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.个体化支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄的比较
J Pers Med. 2022 May 27;12(6):882. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060882.
10
Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Several Guidelines with Unclear Answers.无症状性颈动脉狭窄:多项指南但答案不明。
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022 Mar-Apr;25(2):171-176. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_566_21. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
Transcranial Doppler monitoring for microemboli: a marker of a high-risk carotid plaque.
经颅多普勒监测微栓子:高危颈动脉斑块的一个标志物。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;30(1):62-66. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
4
Resistant Atherosclerosis: The Need for Monitoring of Plaque Burden.抗药动脉粥样硬化:斑块负荷监测的必要性
Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1624-1629. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017392. Epub 2017 May 9.
5
Carotid plaque echogenicity predicts cerebrovascular symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉斑块回声可预测脑血管症状:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Jul;23(7):1241-7. doi: 10.1111/ene.13017. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
6
Plaque Echolucency and the Risk of Ischaemic Stroke in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Within the First Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST-1).无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者中斑块回声不匀与缺血性卒中风险:无症状性颈动脉手术试验 1(ACST-1)
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 May;51(5):616-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
7
Risk of Stroke at the Time of Carotid Occlusion.颈动脉闭塞时的中风风险。
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Nov;72(11):1261-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1843.
8
Prevalence, impact, and predictive value of detecting subclinical coronary and carotid atherosclerosis in asymptomatic adults: the BioImage study.无症状成年人亚临床冠状动脉和颈动脉粥样硬化的患病率、影响和预测价值:BioImage 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 24;65(11):1065-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.017.
9
Molecular imaging of carotid plaque vulnerability.颈动脉斑块易损性的分子成像
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;39(1):5-12. doi: 10.1159/000369123. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
10
Plaque echolucency and stroke risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄中斑块回声与卒中风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2015 Jan;46(1):91-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006091. Epub 2014 Nov 18.